Post-Game Talk: Boourns.. Jets lose to the Bruins 5-4

Status
Not open for further replies.

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,201
31,537
I think he’s great not elite. No one is saying he sucks we are just annoyed he is not top 5 at his position and is more in line with other great players on our team. Ppl still using age are we only stopping using that after he’s 25 and in his prime?

we **** on everyone I’m less annoyed with Roslo turning out to be only a 3rd liner than Laine because of all the hype surrounding him.
people are still using age because hes is 21.... most players don't break out until they are around 23, just look at sheif and Mackinnon
 

Guardian17

Strong & Free
Aug 29, 2010
16,498
24,776
Winnipeg
Well, Colleen was disappointed that we lost.

g-28.jpg


Especially how we had the lead in the third and gave up 2 goals on 2 really bad plays.

6oAPS.gif


But, she understands it was three games in four nights and accepts our apology!

rob_schneider_colleen_haskell_the_animal_002.jpg
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,071
28,558
Laine's now a solid defensive player who has added some other layers to his game. Imo this is the foundation and he will keep adding onto it and imo will get back to being that dangerous goal scorer.

It's Connors game I'm more concerned about. Deadly offensively but his d game is still a hot mess as are his breakouts. It's funny that he is the one skilled winger Maurice doesn't hold to task.
KC is no worse than Laine defensively. KC can produce better offensively though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNP

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,071
28,558
I think he’s great not elite. No one is saying he sucks we are just annoyed he is not top 5 at his position and is more in line with other great players on our team. Ppl still using age are we only stopping using that after he’s 25 and in his prime?

we **** on everyone I’m less annoyed with Roslo turning out to be only a 3rd liner than Laine because of all the hype surrounding him.
He has improved his scoring totals this year. On pace for this best year points wise. The shot has regressed tho. Sh% of 18% the first two years but now its at 11.7%. Still a good number but definitely not at the level it was. He's no Matthews or scheifele
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,718
14,078
I didn't stop him when Laine was the Jets best goal scorer. Just saying. Ehlers works hard but finds himself in the dog house more often as well.

As for what he should do about it, I'm not sure. Maybe switch him and Ehelers on the kill so that he's not run and hard and get him to concentrate more on his d play in his end.


Laine was scoring but he wasn't working half as hard as KC does night in night out - it likely cost him his spot on that top line for reasons beyond scoring goals - I won't get into that because it causes a lot of hurt on this board and it's been covered to death.

Ehlers was never in the dog house IMO - he was simply moved to a line where he might be a better fit - back in that day, Wheels and Scheif played a cycle game and Ehlers did not (and KC did).

I have no problem taking Connor of the PK - that decision will not be a game changer.
 

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,146
10,136
He has improved his scoring totals this year. On pace for this best year points wise. The shot has regressed tho. Sh% of 18% the first two years but now its at 11.7%. Still a good number but definitely not at the level it was.
He is great. My expectations based on hype and draft position maybe unfair but I expected him to be competing and in line for 11 min next year and playing like it.
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,071
28,558
He is great. My expectations based on hype and draft position maybe unfair but I expected him to be competing and in line for 11 min next year and playing like it.
Yeah when he publicly says he should have went first overall the expectations will follow.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,890
75,029
Winnipeg
The law of diminishing returns could also be in play here. The top line is full of three super talented players and there is only one puck to go around. Both Schiefele and Connor both really like to have the puck on their stick which often results in Laine being the default F3 in the zone which doesn't open him up for some of the dangerous looks near the net that the line creates.

I wonder if we may not see Maurice go to a three good line scheme when Little is back. He has already sort of started to balance things out a bit with Copp on Wheelers line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duke749

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,201
31,537
Well they all seem to say that when asked. Echiel, Seguin, Laine, Kakko etc....
and if they answered no then you would hear that they don't have the drive/will to be the best. damn if you do damn if you don't I guess
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,718
14,078
KC is no worse than Laine defensively. KC can produce better offensively though.


KC takes a lot of heat for his D game - mainly because he's not effective in getting much going from a stand still, especially off the boards where there is no where to go and no one to pass to. He isn't going to pick up those dumps and take off when he's got a D man all over him. He doesn't have the size or physical game to do that - maybe someday but I won't hold my breadth.

Throwing the puck around the boards to KC's wing is pretty much a waste of time - same goes for Laine's wing.
If we had a D group that could generate any kind of outlet what so ever, both players would benefit - but we don't so we expect these guys to be good at covering up for our weak exit system (or total lack of).

Both are O players with differing O strengths - Laine's is shooting - so shoot the puck. KC's is generating scoring changes in tight - so that's what he does - successfully.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jets 31 and Ducky10

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,201
31,537
Seguin arguably backed it up. Would like to see your eichel reference. No problem if they back it up
nobody is going to say they don't think they should go 1st overall, holding it against them is ridiculous
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
50,890
75,029
Winnipeg
KC takes a lot of heat for his D game - mainly because he's not effective in getting much going from a stand still, especially off the boards where there is no where to go and no one to pass to. He isn't going to pick up those dumps and take off when he's got a D man all over him. He doesn't have the size or physical game to do that - maybe someday but I won't hold my breadth.

Throwing the puck around the boards to KC's wing is pretty much a waste of time - same goes for Laine's wing.
If we had a D group that could generate any kind of outlet what so ever, both players would benefit - but we don't so we expect these guys to be good at covering up for our weak exit system (or total lack of).

Both are O players with differing O strengths - Laine's is shooting - so shoot the puck. KC's is generating scoring changes in tight - so that's what he does - successfully.

I've found Laine to be pretty competent on the boards this year. I do agree that we need a better breakout system that has the players in motion as they leave the zone.
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,071
28,558
KC takes a lot of heat for his D game - mainly because he's not effective in getting much going from a stand still, especially off the boards where there is no where to go and no one to pass to. He isn't going to pick up those dumps and take off when he's got a D man all over him. He doesn't have the size or physical game to do that - maybe someday but I won't hold my breadth.

Throwing the puck around the boards to KC's wing is pretty much a waste of time - same goes for Laine's wing.
If we had a D group that could generate any kind of outlet what so ever, both players would benefit - but we don't so we expect these guys to be good at covering up for our weak exit system (or total lack of).

Both are O players with differing O strengths - Laine's is shooting - so shoot the puck. KC's is generating scoring changes in tight - so that's what he does - successfully.
KC Imo positonally is pretty inconsistent and is a bit prone to fleeing the zone early. Laine has been the king of ineffective fly bys and i find his dzone exits quite weak. Imo you're splitting hairs with who's better or worse defensively between those two. Scheifele is inconsistent himself, however, he's shown in spurts this year he could be a great 2-way c this season, and of course he was very good prior to last season. That whole top line is no good defensively Imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowLefty

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,718
14,078
The law of diminishing returns could also be in play here. The top line is full of three super talented players and there is only one puck to go around. Both Schiefele and Connor both really like to have the puck on their stick which often results in Laine being the default F3 in the zone which doesn't open him up for some of the dangerous looks near the net that the line creates.

I wonder if we may not see Maurice go to a three good line scheme when Little is back. He has already sort of started to balance things out a bit with Copp on Wheelers line.


You might be onto something - maybe there is a serious shuffle coming -
But, I also see Laine as being a decent fit on this line - he may need to play a little lower to make himself available for a quick pass from behind the net or out of a cycle - bottom line is he needs to put himself in a position to take a pass and shoot the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducky10 and surixon

rubikscube

Registered User
Oct 27, 2017
3,020
5,667
Weinerpeg
That isn’t Laine’s motivation anymore. The coach has made it clear that he should become a defensive power forward who can chip in offensively. Laine is becoming what Maurice has moulded him to become.
I don't like saying this, but you truly have no idea what you're talking about.
The Laine crusade needs to stop.
You don't know what he's been told as much as anyone else here.
Laine is playing fine this year, but he's not playing good enough for a guy of his apparent caliber and its not Maurices fault.

Let it go already
 
Last edited:

kanadalainen

A pint of dark matter, please.
Jan 7, 2017
20,795
61,766
The 100th Meridian
@Ginger Papa - Burner account? :eek::huh::laugh: I hardly have enough time to populate my own account. :laugh:

That thought has crossed my mind as well :laugh:

:laugh: Hey... woah... don't look at me. I have literally no urge to shout at boards men and women. Sadly I'm not even a person with links to Finnish genetics, despite my affection for racing small powerful cars through deep snow. I have one account - dedicated to sousing y'all with .... well you know. :DD

- Kind regards,

Kanadalainen

 
Last edited:

Duke749

Savannah Ghost Pirates
Apr 6, 2010
48,254
23,789
Canton, Georgia
The law of diminishing returns could also be in play here. The top line is full of three super talented players and there is only one puck to go around. Both Schiefele and Connor both really like to have the puck on their stick which often results in Laine being the default F3 in the zone which doesn't open him up for some of the dangerous looks near the net that the line creates.

I wonder if we may not see Maurice go to a three good line scheme when Little is back. He has already sort of started to balance things out a bit with Copp on Wheelers line.

Yeh I feel there may be a change soon. Things feel a bit stale.

Also, Sbisa is a freakin pylon and that line change was a joke.
 

nobody imp0rtant

Registered pessimist
May 23, 2018
10,949
18,293
Well, Colleen was disappointed that we lost.

g-28.jpg


Especially how we had the lead in the third and gave up 2 goals on 2 really bad plays.

6oAPS.gif


But, she understands it was three games in four nights and accepts our apology!

rob_schneider_colleen_haskell_the_animal_002.jpg

I think Colleen should go from special guest appearance to series regular in the GDT's. :nod:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guardian17
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $50.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $50.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad