Thanks for the insight BillI've wanted him gone. Maybe this will speed up the process.
Thanks for the insight BillI've wanted him gone. Maybe this will speed up the process.
Like Chuck Fletcher, Harvard grad? I am sure that MN (still paying for his moves) and PHI fans might tend to differ.Why are ex players in management roles in hockey teams, anyway? Those should be left to people that have an actual leadership education. Ex hockey players should be coaches or other related jobs. Makes no sense. They don't have any kind of qualifications for work like this.
Nail on the head.BTW, while i am sorry that Andrew Heydt has had to go this route, because by all accounts he is a decent guy, this Wild fan is far more worried about Guerin's ability to assemble a winning hockey team. He, or people around him (i.e. Judd Brackett)have done some good things, but giving long term contracts to aging, bottom six players(Foligno, Gaudreau, Zuccarello, Goligoski, Hartman) prematurely has me worried about his ability to build a team. Most of those named above will be with the team for years into the future, blocking young talent, and their NMC's make them near impossible to move.
Guerin seems to have a temper problem, and makes impulsive decisions. This incident(s?)seems to be a warning sign of a person unfit to run an organization, but hey, if he gets us to a Conference final then all is good, right? Bottom line is that winning cures all.
The Wild are in 27th place in the league.
i'd replace "chimp" with "average hockey player who grew up in the 80s and 90s." He's very much a product of old school jock culture and all the stereotypes that come with that. I can absolutely see his brand of tough love/discipline being considered abuse by today's standards.Guerin has shown throughout his tenure here that he has the interpersonal skills of a chimp.
Man oh man, the snowflakes teams employ these days... suck it up buttercup!Yelled at employee? Rofl.
Yelling at a person can be done as part of a heated argument, without resorting to verbal abuse. It appears, from your demeaning words, that maybe you weren't aware of that.He yelled at me I want him fired boo hoo
Verbal abuse is the harmful use of language to control, intimidate or hurt someone. It can include behaviour such as name-calling, belittling, or using controlling or threatening language.
Arguing, on the other hand, is a disagreement or a difference of opinion which is expressed by the parties in a respectful manner. Although it may include strong emotions or raised voices, it is not intended to harm or demean the other person.
my big concern is why Russo burned his source like that. f***ed up. i wouldn't talk to Russo after that if i was inside the org. unless he had some sort of permission.
Explain the joke? I don't get it.Guerin probably assumed the guys gender and the guy considered it violent assault against him.
Kidding aside, it's tough to know for sure what happened, what was said, and the context of the conversation to have a real sense of what happened.
The only interesting thing about it is that some of us are continuing to try to understand others and have respect for their feelings day to day, and some of us think that's just too beyond the pale and a sign of a weakening society...I think it's interesting how "Professional Conduct" seems to have morphed from generally carrying yourself like an adult into being responsible for the emotional states of everyone around you at all times.
Obviously adults should not yell at each other like they're the Drill Sergeant from Full Metal Jacket. That is bad behavior outside of a military training context. On the other, that we should all be so afraid of each other's feelings leads to our own walking on eggshells. There's a balance to be struck here, and posters piling in to threads to grouse about how yelling is bad mmmkay feel like they're just as much of a problem as a yeller.
If the boss is a screaming prick, that's bad. If your coworkers are a bunch of pheasants who cluck and peck at any signs of anger or personal conflict, that's also bad. Being a professional means putting your anger aside and not shouting, but it also means being able to keep your head when tensions do boil over. Nobody is impressed by the morality of dunking on a yeller, that's just being a judgemental gossip.
I had a hearty chuckle around pages 4-5 where some people were arguing about morality with a poster who clearly had a knowledge of the actual law. @ThatGuy22 well done lol
He yelled at a guy and that’s it? It’s a hockey club. It’s not a kindergarten.
The only interesting thing about it is that some of us are continuing to try to understand others and have respect for their feelings day to day, and some of us think that's just too beyond the pale and a sign of a weakening society...
This isn't a "both sides" argument, generally don't yell at people. People asking you to find a different way to communicate aren't "as much of a problem" as the yeller, the f*** are you talking about?
It's really not difficult to be kind to people and have consideration for them beyond what you can legally get away with.
A valid but very separate discussion, nobody likes a snake in the grass but the snake in the grass also doesn't generally "walk on eggshells" either because they're psychos and practiced bullies who know where the blind spots are.Sometimes too though, I would rather know who I am dealing with. Some of the biggest bullies I have ever witnessed (in a workplace or otherwise) work in stealth mode.