Friedman is already saying Evans ask is a 2nd. There is going to be multiple teams in that conversation. Good chance that gets bumped to a 1st. If that becomes the price for Evans, it would be better to directly address the scoring issues and pay the premium for Tolvanen or Bjorkstrand if Francis is making them available. That's kind of my point. I like Evans and think he would be a great fit, but the cost if it gets pushed to 1st range, its not worth it to pay that and still not address the scoring issues. Evans shooting at 20% playing 15.5 minutes a game and might get close to 20 goals this season. I don't like that high shooting percentage, it was like Coleman coming and his shooting percentage dropping but his defensive game completely made up for it. We have enough defensive forwards, we need scoring depth and I don't see Evans being that solution for scoring depth and what he will cost is going to should push us to actually address scoring. But hey, I am just dumb internet shit poster, so I could be completely wrong (most likely).
Goodrow and Coleman made sense at the time because we really didn't have the PK or bottom lines shutting down anyone. We played games before them as a track meet, winning strictly by outscoring 5-4, 6-4 games. Right now, we aren't doing that. As much as we shit on the team, defensively, from the forward core and special teams, they are doing the best they have done since Goodrow and Coleman. If Armia is cheap, like 4th round pick, sure grab him. Whatever. But he doesn't make us much better or worse, he really doesn't move the needle much aside from depth in case of injuries.