Oddbob
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2016
- 16,799
- 11,382
30 goals 40 assists 100 points
The math certainly adds up.
I think he will do worse than most think. 22 G, 29 A, 51 PTS in 70-82 games.
30 goals 40 assists 100 points
how is this kid generational if most of you think he's not even going to put up 60 in his rookie year?
I say he pushes larmers rookie hawks record with at least 43 goals
and he'll either be even or below with assists
45G 40A
I like this. But I think he gets it in 65 games.23 goals, 36 assists
40-60 points.
He'll enjoy the usual learning curve of smaller players and find out that playing against men who've spent years fine tuning their bodies aren't going to just let him have his way.
Has anybody since McDavid truly been touted and performed like a generational talent? He's not your average 1st round pick. He's technically performed at a higher level than McDavid as far as Juniors career is concerned. There's a good reason why people expect big numbers from him.Lots of sky-high expectations.
Has anyone besides McDavid lived up to the hype in the last decade? More?
Every year it's the same thing, "this is the one"!!
Every year, around Christmas, we get a "is X a bust??"
If he goes 30/30, I think it would be considered a successful season.
I mean, there have been 5 players since 2000 that have scored more than 72 points in their rookie season. Two of them were Sid and Ovi in the same year.
THIS. He plays 25 games, gets concussed, then will be the biggest bust since Alexandre Daigle...I predict he gets hurt - misses significant time and never lives up to expectations.
Has anybody since McDavid truly been touted and performed like a generational talent? He's not your average 1st round pick. He's technically performed at a higher level than McDavid as far as Juniors career is concerned. There's a good reason why people expect big numbers from him.
Nobody has been touted as highly as Bedard since McDavid. His WHL numbers are Crosby/McDavid level and he absolutely dominated in the WJC at a level even McDavid didn't. I don't know if he'll peak quite as high as McDavid but he'll be better than anybody else in the league imo (around 135 if I had to guess). He has a generational shot, extremely high hockey IQ, great agility/positioning and great playmaking. He's that good. Players on his level usually hit the ground running. Crosby did, McDavid did, and Bedard has a good chance to do the same. He doesn't have to be McDavid to at least produce at a ppg. Even Barzal did that.I think he'll be an outstanding player, eventually.
And yes, we hear about the next Great One almost every year.
In the last 20 years, there has been one.
Do you think he'll be better than McDavid, since he performed at a "higher level" in Junior?
Very, very, unlikely.
Has anybody since McDavid truly been touted and performed like a generational talent? He's not your average 1st round pick. He's technically performed at a higher level than McDavid as far as Juniors career is concerned. There's a good reason why people expect big numbers from him.
there's one generational player in the NHL today his name is Connor McDavid, Bedard won't change that. Also good luck to the idiots paying $500 for Bedard Young Guns.
I called it with Hughes when he was breaking records with the USNTDP, he'll be a star but I think it's going to take him a season or two to adjust. Hughes was probably a more extreme case but I think Bedard will be similar. He doesn't have the size or a specific gamebreaking physical attribute to rely on (e.g., McDavid's skating) while he adjusts to the league.
20 goals-45 points