- Jul 24, 2005
- 12,760
- 5,440
Edmonton has 1,777. Toronto has 1,715.Lol. Take that ‘this season’ back to 16-17 and how many more opportunities do the oilers have?
Oilers have had 62 more PP than Toronto since 2016-17.
Edmonton has 1,777. Toronto has 1,715.Lol. Take that ‘this season’ back to 16-17 and how many more opportunities do the oilers have?
People often refer to it as a 5 year deal because the contract doesn’t start until next year so it’s 5 more years of Matthews in Toronto.yea you're correct. I don't know why I assumed it was a 5 year deal. He'll need to average 84.5
Leafs are a cash cow, doesn't matter if the team sucks or not, the NHL will always be able to milk them for millions. Smaller franchises ? Not the case. That's the only logical thing I can think of. That reasoning could be wrong as well, tbh I don't know the exact reason why. But it does happen. I've seen it happen with Toronto and Edmonton. Or maybe the old boys club still doesn't want actual skill to shine and want to cater more towards the plugs and "old time physical" hockey, aka bunch of slow ass plugs interfering the entire game as we see in the playoffs.I don’t feel like that is a likely explanation. Why would the refs, who there are many of, conspire to rig games against the leafs?
Woof. As another possession team, it doesn’t make sense. I don’t think it’s a huge conspiracy, I just think it’s easier not to call something questionable vs a big market, than it is to make an iffy call. There’s no reason to have huge discrepancies like that.Edmonton has 1,777. Toronto has 1,715.
Oilers have had 62 more PP than Toronto since 2016-17.
Sorry, are you say there is a huge discrepancy between Edmonton and Toronto, or both teams vs. the rest of the league?Woof. As another possession team, it doesn’t make sense. I don’t think it’s a huge conspiracy, I just think it’s easier not to call something questionable vs a big market, than it is to make an iffy call. There’s no reason to have huge discrepancies like that.
Our friend from boston thinks it’s 2011, the big bad bruins are still around and that’s the reason. But it’s just not true. Boston hasn’t been tough in years. I’d be surprised if the leafs don’t push them around a bit this year if they end up playing eachother. That’s not me saying the leafs are ultra tough either, but they do hold their own.
I don't think there is a conspiracy. I think there is some subconscious biasI don’t feel like that is a likely explanation. Why would the refs, who there are many of, conspire to rig games against the leafs?
8.8 powerplays a season is that big of a difference?Woof. As another possession team, it doesn’t make sense. I don’t think it’s a huge conspiracy, I just think it’s easier not to call something questionable vs a big market, than it is to make an iffy call. There’s no reason to have huge discrepancies like that.
Our friend from boston thinks it’s 2011, the big bad bruins are still around and that’s the reason. But it’s just not true. Boston hasn’t been tough in years. I’d be surprised if the leafs don’t push them around a bit this year if they end up playing eachother. That’s not me saying the leafs are ultra tough either, but they do hold their own.
my other team are the cowboys (cause i hate myself i guess), i def see some big market bias there, think we went like 8 or 9 games without a single holding call for us, and nonstop phantom holdings against us.Leafs are a cash cow, doesn't matter if the team sucks or not, the NHL will always be able to milk them for millions. Smaller franchises ? Not the case. That's the only logical thing I can think of. That reasoning could be wrong as well, tbh I don't know the exact reason why. But it does happen. I've seen it happen with Toronto and Edmonton. Or maybe the old boys club still doesn't want actual skill to shine and want to cater more towards the plugs and "old time physical" hockey, aka bunch of slow ass plugs interfering the entire game as we see in the playoffs.
stanley cup is the ultimate goal but watching your team win more games than lose during an 82 game regular season is still fun. Superstars doing well is just the cherry on top.At least this Leafs team got 60 goal scorer. Those late years in 2000's and for good portion of 2010's were not fun to watch
Leafs are a cash cow, doesn't matter if the team sucks or not, the NHL will always be able to milk them for millions. Smaller franchises ? Not the case. That's the only logical thing I can think of. That reasoning could be wrong as well, tbh I don't know the exact reason why. But it does happen. I've seen it happen with Toronto and Edmonton. Or maybe the old boys club still doesn't want actual skill to shine and want to cater more towards the plugs and "old time physical" hockey, aka bunch of slow ass plugs interfering the entire game as we see in the playoffs.
Yep, pretty much how I view each season. As we seen alot worse in regular seasons in past.stanley cup is the ultimate goal but watching your team win more games than lose during an 82 game regular season is still fun. Superstars doing well is just the cherry on top.
Edmonton has 6 more PP chances than Toronto this season. Not exactly night and day differences we're talking about.
Both teams don't get called nearly as much as they likely should.
Both. As possession teams, there shouldn’t be that big of a differenceSorry, are you say there is a huge discrepancy between Edmonton and Toronto, or both teams vs. the rest of the league?
One less game and 6 more PP. Is that a valid argument for a “huge difference”?Edmonton has played less games also, yet gotten more PP.
I think the tweet was in reference to last season.
"Teams take less penalties against Toronto because they know their PP is good" contradicts the Oilers last season with an all-time great PP percentage whille sitting 6th in the NHL in PP opportunities a game.
That’s a 3.5% difference. How on earth is that “big”?Both. As possession teams, there shouldn’t be that big of a difference
That should say both teams vs rest of the league.That’s a 3.5% difference. How on earth is that “big”?
It was 41 in 52
It means he was on pace for it silly, no need to get all huffy and puffy over it
Quick math suggested that he was on pace for 76 goals through the same number of games this season, but reality has played out and he just hit 60 with 9 games to go.
There are no guarantees. There’s a very select few players in NHL who get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to projecting out high paces over entire seasons, and Matthews isn’t one of them.
Similar to Crosby fans, Matthews fans are getting a little distracted by the what if and pace game, when the player is actually still doing wonderful things.
I gotta say it does seem odd how they don't get as many.
Sure sometimes it changes up based on players on a team but the Leafs seem to continuously be at the bottom.
Matthews line drives play it doesn't add up.
What a f***ing legend
I don't think there is a conspiracy. I think there is some subconscious bias
So as long as we’re cool saying that McDavid would have had 150 points that year as well, then we’ll treat it as an absolute.Of course he would have hit 60 in the Covid shortened season. That season was his coming out party, and he was robbed.
So as long as we’re cool saying that McDavid would have had 150 points that year as well, then we’ll treat it as an absolute.
So as long as we’re cool saying that McDavid would have had 150 points that year as well, then we’ll treat it as an absolute.