IranCondraAffair
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2006
- 9,258
- 3,956
Probably user error.That tool is worse than useless.
Probably user error.That tool is worse than useless.
Agree, I think JBD is closer to Zub & probably exactly what Sanderson will need as a partner next season. If they were to go after another RD I would like to see them get a big tough mobile 3rd pairing RD like Scott Mayfield to patrol our blueline & pair him with Kleven in future.The supposed plyer we’re looking for is closer to Zub than Chychrun. We’re not a better team with that swap.
Mayfield is going to get paid like a 2nd pairing guy. Id steer clear.Agree, I think JBD is closer to Zub & probably exactly what Sanderson will need as a partner next season. If they were to go after another RD I would like to see them get a big tough mobile 3rd pairing RD like Scott Mayfield to patrol our blueline & pair him with Kleven in future.
He's a top 4 defenseman.Mayfield is going to get paid like a 2nd pairing guy. Id steer clear.
On one hand that could be good news knowing he hasn't refused a serious offer. On the other hand, I'm not entirely sure how high Dorion is on Zub. He even said (who knows how much is lip service) that Zub was given a two-year deal because they expect JBD/Thomson to eventually be ready. Letting Zub walk would undo a lot of good Dorion has done.
Even if we get Chychrun and Zub walks, I'm not exactly thrilled.
Can you imagine Chychrun blocking Ovi's shot with his hand???The supposed plyer we’re looking for is closer to Zub than Chychrun. We’re not a better team with that swap.
Not as much as Chychrun will cost & Mayfield can play more roles.Mayfield is going to get paid like a 2nd pairing guy. Id steer clear.
Mayfield is going to cash in this summer on a deal similar to Zub IMO. He would fit on our 3rd pair behind Zub and JBD.Not as much as Chychrun will cost & Mayfield can play more roles.
Maybe, we'll see, he's a good player so good for him if he does. He's exactly the kind of player we need on our backend IMO.Mayfield is going to cash in this summer on a deal similar to Zub IMO.
Pay the man. Get him locked up.Must re-sign.
5.5- 6m will be good... maybe 4.5 -5
that type D cost 4-5 m in past 1-2 year.. now will be 5- 6.5 max...
hi is 27 , short contract about max 4-5 year and 5.5-6.
or large 6-7 year and 4.5-5..
I’d go 4.5 x 6. 27M vs 25M. Every 500K in cap space is important moving forward.6M seems too much.
You think he'll take 5x5?
I’d go 4.5 x 6. 27M vs 25M. Every 500K in cap space is important moving forward.
He would turn 33 right before the final season.Yeah, I'd do that too. I don't think we would regret the 6th year.
So you are saying we should sign him for 8 years?He would turn 33 right before the final season.
I don’t like 8 year term for good not great players. 6 is my max.So you are saying we should sign him for 8 years?
He is the type of player that will age gracefully. He is so smart and smooth that even if his skating slows a bit he would be a strong defender and if he is pushed down the line-up that $4.5 won't look bad in 5 more years.
Doubt we get him that low but I have no issues with having him be a core player for a long time.
Ya, was being cheeky there but personally, after this much time watching his game I wouldn't have a problem with it (at that number or slightly higher).I don’t like 8 year term for good not great players. 6 is my max.