Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 57,092
- 34,851
Re-signed Holden in advance.Dorion is only proactive when it's time to re-sign goaltenders
Re-signed Holden in advance.Dorion is only proactive when it's time to re-sign goaltenders
Overall point still holds though, I think — last time the team re-signed a guy with more than one year left before becoming UFA was 2017 — both Anderson and Borowiecki.Re-signed Holden in advance.
95% of the things we worry about never happen. I'm confident Zub will re-sign here somewhere around 5 yrs & $5 mil. I'm also confident Norris, Formenton & Joseph also re-sign, the others I care less about. The other thing that is important this off season is getting rid of a couple of albatross contracts like White, Zaitsev, Murray & MDZ to a lesser extent. How they do this or whether they do it is another matter.
Zub will not resign. He took undercut for a reason and Dorion was informed. Dorion really thought he will have something in JBD and Thomson to replace him. Zub will go south for 5.5-6 million a year, after one more year to a better weather and less of a headache. Now for Dorion to sign him, he needs to offer at least 6 years for 5.5 million, to cover the salary lost of the last year. The cheap pays double at the end.
If you're saying that he won't re-sign, then I'm confident he will.Zub will not resign. He took undercut for a reason and Dorion was informed. Dorion really thought he will have something in JBD and Thomson to replace him. Zub will go south for 5.5-6 million a year, after one more year to a better weather and less of a headache. Now for Dorion to sign him, he needs to offer at least 6 years for 5.5 million, to cover the salary lost of the last year. The cheap pays double at the end.
Zub will not resign. He took undercut for a reason and Dorion was informed. Dorion really thought he will have something in JBD and Thomson to replace him. Zub will go south for 5.5-6 million a year, after one more year to a better weather and less of a headache. Now for Dorion to sign him, he needs to offer at least 6 years for 5.5 million, to cover the salary lost of the last year. The cheap pays double at the end.
Yeahhhhhh, but context matters.Overall point still holds though, I think — last time the team re-signed a guy with more than one year left before becoming UFA was 2017 — both Anderson and Borowiecki.
So you are saying he is already gone? Won't sign here?
If so, better trade him, get assets and then really get moving on 2 new top 4 RD.
That is what, "The 50" would do.
I hear what you're saying, and I agree with most of it. I'm not worried about Zub re-signing because of the recent stability and the lack of Melnyk influence. But that doesn't exactly change the accuracy of what I said, does it? By choice or by circumstance, we haven't re-signed a guy more than a year out from UFA in five years going on six. Was there really not a single guy worth extending sooner than later?Yeahhhhhh, but context matters.
We just went through a period of selling off literally everyone. We can’t really expect to be signing guys at the same time as selling them all off.
The fanbase was also terrified that we couldn’t sign our guys off their ELC, or that we wouldn’t be able to sign our guys out of college.
Yet, every year we sign them, including the massive deals for Brady and Batherson, all our college stars come over as planned, and every subsequent year the fear is alive and well with the same folks terrified and angry.
If we can hand-wring and be miserable about the prospects of something occurring, then we’ll do it with gusto, and someone will craft a narrow stat list to support it, and it will become a Sens fact, a Sens myth, and then a Sens fear.
Much like with horror movies you have a laugh at the scary bits to take away their power
Plenty for a crafty GM.How many top 4 RD are being made available this summer?
Technically you can't sign someone with more than one year left, you have to be in the final year of the contract, we signed Anderson and Boro at the beginning of their eligibility to re-sign, and Holden 6 months in to him being eligible.Overall point still holds though, I think — last time the team re-signed a guy with more than one year left before becoming UFA was 2017 — both Anderson and Borowiecki.
Nope, fair enough, and I went off on a tangent because I’ve seen it mentioned in other threads.I hear what you're saying, and I agree with most of it. I'm not worried about Zub re-signing because of the recent stability and the lack of Melnyk influence. But that doesn't exactly change the accuracy of what I said, does it? By choice or by circumstance, we haven't re-signed a guy more than a year out from UFA in five years going on six. Was there really not a single guy worth extending sooner than later?
Plenty for a crafty GM.
Point is if Zub wont be signing you immediately need to shift in to damage control.
If we don't resign him then we are in trouble either way.Except there really aren’t. If this team wants a RD back for Zub they’re likely getting a younger one, not getting a second one, and this rebuild is going backwards. It’s not all that realistic to assume that you can move him and immediately replace him, which is what makes the decision difficult if you aren’t able to sign him this summer.
Not if we make a fair offer and re-sign him before he hits UFA.Someone might overpay for Zub.
These are Zub's 5v5 stats. Relative to an average 6th defender they are real bad. Now, obviously a big part of that is how terrible our team is and the fact that still puts Zub as our 2nd best defenceman behind Chabot is disgusting.
I only post this to caution putting Zub on a pedestal simply because he was able to tie his own skates which is more than can be said for most of our D men.
I like Zub, I want to re-sign him, I don't want to sign him for 6M a year or whatever craziness is being thrown around
"This hurts my preconceived perception so its trash"Trash analytics.
Im not going to let a poor attempt at modeling reality cloud the actual observation of reality.
$6m is too much though.