Alberta_OReilly_Fan
Bruin fan since 1975
66 points in 71 games, not a minus player in any year of the playoffs. Can be the driving force on a line. He was the reason Hagelin-Bonino-Kessel was so good. Hagelin went from 16 points to 2 without Kessel. Bonino dropped from 18 to 7.
Not valuable. They may still move him for cap reasons, but to say he isn't valuable is just pure ********.
I'd trade Backes straight up for Kessel today. No GM says yes to that though.
Kessel 2 time loser
Backes 0 time winner.
for what its worth i doubt backes has any trade value either. big contracts started to lose trade value right around the time we traded thornton. detroit got very little for federov. looking at the past decade now contracts kill value. people say edmonton got ripped off for hall... but i didnt think theyd get alot for hall unless the contracts balanced.
kessel for backes? i think boston adds...
im a backes fan but thats irrelevent. i admire kessels skill and acknoeledge he produces offense
its fair to criticise kessels effort and team play based on the evidence. its fair to qualify his success in pittsburgh by saying hes playing in the shadow of 2 of the only 4 or 5 players in the nhl more talented than he is.
if kessel came to boston he would be our most talented player... in the nhl, the most talented player is usually the captain. the most talented player becomes your teams role model.
if guys like this join great teams... its possible to bury them. but if they are being expected to elevate a bad team, the results are not pretty.
its about right fit for a guy like kessel... or for that matter backes at his age. but imho neither has much trade value