Fjordy
私たちはそうでした - 私たちはそうではありません。
- Jun 20, 2018
- 17,712
- 9,776
If they don't make the playoffs it will be very painful after last season. Players are not robots, and even more fans.sigh…see above.
If they don't make the playoffs it will be very painful after last season. Players are not robots, and even more fans.sigh…see above.
Ottawa scored 5 points less than Buffalo, this is a small difference. They also had injuries. In general, if you look at their roster, it looks good.
So far, I'm not happy with Adams in the offseason, he still hasn't solved the problem with goalie, we don't know if Clifton will work in the top 4 and we already had Quinn out due to injury. I have no confidence that we will score more points than last season and advance to the playoffs. Too many risks and if.
I'm with you, but I think the only thing that keeps them out of the playoffs are a slew of injuries.incidentally, call me impatient but if the team misses the playoffs this year, I think it's strictly a failure. I can acknowledge different but valid opinions about last year, but at a certain point you need to start actually doing the thing
Nothing in this world is strictly black and white but it will be hard to see a silver lining. Especially given how many players the Sabres were in position to acquire that they passed up on.incidentally, call me impatient but if the team misses the playoffs this year, I think it's strictly a failure. I can acknowledge different but valid opinions about last year, but at a certain point you need to start actually doing the thing
I am waiting for the dust to settle.
Rumors from Seravalli a couple weeks back said that NHL teams may have been notified and were expecting suspensions from the hockey Canada investigation. This signing right now feels like it might be a Batherson replacement insurance move.
Of course, nothing may happen, but if it does, it may still be a downgrade on their overall roster.
Nothing in this world is strictly black and white but it will be hard to see a silver lining. Especially given how many players the Sabres were in position to acquire that they passed up on.
Sabres score a lot of goals, which is fun to watch. High event hockey!A lot of people are saying this...gotta admit I'm a little surprised by this sentiment after basically making no significant moves in the offseason, and the roster looking unimpressive on paper. The bottom 6 is still average at best, and the whole team was one of the worst defensive teams in sabres history last year.
I'm glad people are starting to watch buffalo, and see the same promise that we do, but I feel the expectations might be getting a bit too high? We may have only been two points from a playoff spot last season, but usually you'd need more points than that to make the playoffs, and Ottawa should be a lot better this year, etc. I'm not sure how confident we should be.
I don’t see how your question is relevant to the responseit will be interesting. Wasnt Comtois also on that team? I don’t think he got signed After not getting qualified.
like who? What would they have needed to give up which then affects thrm in 25/26 and 26/27 where having that ELC/ low contract helps
Especially given how many players the Sabres were in position to acquire that they passed up on.
yrsr to year you will have many variables like injuries, is the whole team hot at once or cold st once or would you like the hot streak moving around
the team is still very young. It will nice if they make the playoffs next year but it’s not the end of the world if they missed.
we have cozens, Krebs, Quinn, Peterka, power, and others thst are not near peak for a few years.
Boston had everything go right year last year while the year before they just got in. Devils had that early hot streak that built up their confidence
ottawa still has D/G question marks.
toronto— even signing Matthews still leaves thrm 3 other F where I only see 1 still being around.
Missing the playoffs won't be a huge deal if its while the team is progressing still. Say they get 95 points and still miss....probably not a huge deal.
However, if they regress, it's essentially going to invalidate Adams primary talking point on the team, That "all the progress will be from internal improvement" or some version of it. His lassiez faire approach to GMing has been, for the most part, tolerated, because the on ice product has improved. What happens when that stops happening?
I agree with you one hundred percent!Missing the playoffs won't be a huge deal if its while the team is progressing still. Say they get 95 points and still miss....probably not a huge deal.
However, if they regress, it's essentially going to invalidate Adams primary talking point on the team, That "all the progress will be from internal improvement" or some version of it. His lassiez faire approach to GMing has been, for the most part, tolerated, because the on ice product has improved. What happens when that stops happening?
The excuse of injuries... So are you advocating for more NHL level depth then? Because you can't just add that ad infinitum. Sure there's one spot for another forward but I'm not mad letting the Roch guys battle for it. D is full obviously.Any player that would counter the excuse of injuries… which is the obvious response to “how could they miss the playoffs and not have it be a disaster.” Do you need me to explain to you who Tyson Jost and Zemgus Girgensons are? or post the age of Kyle Okposo and Devon Levi?
Nearly all of the hits currently on the roster are from the previous regime…Adams is building a dynasty of assets (which will hopefully translate), and signing amazing players at team friendly deals. He hasn't wasted all our greatest assets on players who couldn't stay on their teams they were traded from; plus he's hit on a lot more players than previous regimes. I'll take it.
"nearly all", eh? I guess it all depends on how you define a "hit".Nearly all of the hits currently on the roster are from the previous regime…
To be fair, he used Jack Eichel to aquire Tuch and Krebs. And Power was a first overall pick."nearly all", eh? I guess it all depends on how you define a "hit".
I call Tuch, Krebs, Quinn, Peterka and Power hits....they're Adams. That's not "nearly all". Not by a longshot.
Tuch is a hit, but at the expense of Eichel. Trading out a hit by the previous regime for a hit of your own is not an increase in the number of hits over the previous regime."nearly all", eh? I guess it all depends on how you define a "hit".
I call Tuch, Krebs, Quinn, Peterka and Power hits....they're Adams. That's not "nearly all". Not by a longshot.
I wouldn't call Krebs a "hit""nearly all", eh? I guess it all depends on how you define a "hit".
I call Tuch, Krebs, Quinn, Peterka and Power hits....they're Adams. That's not "nearly all". Not by a longshot.