Bobby Orrtuzzo
Ya know
Captain hindsight strikes again!You didn’t even want him and called him a choker lol.
Captain hindsight strikes again!You didn’t even want him and called him a choker lol.
Even if it's your dream to run the Leafs, do you really want to take the job now? One year to go for it then Matthews either gets a raise or walks. They have so little flexibility with that roster and you'd be even more restricted if Shanahan or whoever else has to approve your moves. I feel like you'd be stuck with this roster for a year, then you'd be stuck with a worse roster. All while in the market with the dumbest, loudest media.Toronto Maple Leafs News | The Star
The best Toronto Maple Leafs coverage from Star columnists and reporters. Get your leafs news, scores, game coverage and more from thestar.com.www.thestar.com
The plan remains for Shanahan to do his due diligence in finding the next GM of the Leafs but it seems former Calgary Flames GM Brad Treliving is the focus this week. Talks between the two are expected to continue well into next week … Blues president and GM Doug Armstrong has always told those close to him that his dream job would be running the Leafs. Yet it seems unlikely he ends up in Toronto for two reasons: the three years remaining on his contract in which he has no out clause; and having to report to someone other than ownership. In St. Louis, Armstrong has total control over the his team and only answers to owner Tom Stillman …
They removed compensation for GM'sthey can have armstrong if they compensate us for him
Didn’t realize his save percentage was that high, thats pretty damn impressive. They’ve been a great story I really hope they beat Vegas.Damn Bob has a .935 save percentage. It's been a good bounce back for him as he has been dissapointing these past couple of years
He's the #1 cop on the force!Didn’t realize his save percentage was that high, thats pretty damn impressive. They’ve been a great story I really hope they beat Vegas.
Quick needs a game in the finals to get his name on the Cup again.Sean Burke (Goaltending Coach) being involved is cool, but that also means Quick might get a 3rd opportunity. Dang.
I’m kinda vibing with another Pietrangelo-Barbashev Cup. Former Blues draftee, Carrier will most likely his chance as well.
Sean Burke (Goaltending Coach) being involved is cool, but that also means Quick might get a 3rd opportunity. Dang.
Ah, I see. Outside chance, then.Quick needs a game in the finals to get his name on the Cup again.
The rule could be different for goalies, but you either have to play a game in the finals, or 41 on the winning team in the regular season. I don't see Hill giving up the net at all with how he has been playing though.Ah, I see. Outside chance, then.
Isn’t there a thing though that a team can add a couple special names? Like how the Blues had Thorburn on there?The rule could be different for goalies, but you either have to play a game in the finals, or 41 on the winning team in the regular season. I don't see Hill giving up the net at all with how he has been playing though.
The rule could be different for goalies, but you either have to play a game in the finals, or 41 on the winning team in the regular season. I don't see Hill giving up the net at all with how he has been playing though.
I don't necessarily think you're incorrect. Just relaying the sentiment that seems to have been spread, be it by media, Dubas' "team", or fans.Doesn’t every GM work with those constraints? They are answering to the ownership group about big moves, in some fashion. In this case it’s through the president of hockey operations.
We‘ve heard Doug Armstrong talk about taking offers to the owner first, and I’d have to think ST Louis has the least meddling style. Contrast that with the stuff Armstrong in Arizona has to deal worth. I guess I don’t see Dubas’ situation terribly differently. He got to hire his coach.
There may be some legit beefs with how Shanahan managed him, but all I’ve seen on this forum is bizarre character assertions from the distant past, about unrelated issues. Is there anything concrete to this today?
what did he do or say?Brindamour did an outstanding job of making himself extremely unlikeable during this postseason.
Didn’t see this at all.Brindamour did an outstanding job of making himself extremely unlikeable during this postseason.
According to him, the Hurricanes were not swept by the Panthers and did not lose 4 games in a row resulting in their elimination.. Guess we just weren't paying attention??what did he do or say
According to him, the Hurricanes were not swept by the Panthers and did not lose 4 games in a row resulting in their elimination.. Guess we just weren't paying attention??
According to him, the Hurricanes were not swept by the Panthers and did not lose 4 games in a row resulting in their elimination.. Guess we just weren't paying attention??
I genuinely don't understand how writers can botch such a major point of this story. The balance of power between Dubas and Shanny was heavily discussed as a contributing factor Dubas and the Leafs parting ways. The fact that Dubas was GM and Shanny is President of Hockey Operations was a well-known, reported story line.Blues GM Doug Armstrong declines comment on Toronto Maple Leafs GM rumors
St. Louis Blues general manager Doug Armstrong’s name has been floated by reporters since the Maple Leafs GM vacancy opened.www.stltoday.com
A lateral move from one GM position to another has been unprecedented in the last 15 years. Many general managers that move from organization to organization do so with a change in roles and have not immediately jumped from GM to GM.
Ken Holland spent 18 days as a senior vice president in Detroit before he was hired as the Oilers’ general manager. Steve Yzerman was a senior advisor for seven months in Tampa Bay before he moved to Detroit. Lou Lamoriello was a senior advisor for 22 days in Toronto before the Islanders hired him to be the general manager. Dale Tallon (Chicago to Florida) and Jim Rutherford (Carolina to Pittsburgh) had similar paths.
His wording was a bad choice but I see the point he was trying to make. Sure the Hurricanes got swept by Panthers in the fact they lost four games, but he was trying to illustrate the point that all the games were close and they could of gone either way.According to him, the Hurricanes were not swept by the Panthers and did not lose 4 games in a row resulting in their elimination.. Guess we just weren't paying attention??