There's an interesting 'butterfly effect' to having these generational talents on your team. They put upwards pressure on your internal cap, just as the Jets having near elite star players on good value contracts pushing values down.
I really wonder if it's worth it to have a McDavid, a Matthews or a Bedard on your team?
Sure, they're fun as hell to watch and they can win you games near single handedly, but they harm your cap so much that they could prevent you from building a legitimate perennial contender.
Exacerbating this is covid and how it flattened the cap.
Luckily for the Jets, our one superstar is at the goaltending position, which has 3 benefits:
Goalies, more than any other position, impact team results.
Goals tend to get paid less than other position players at an elite level
You can't really use a goalies salary as a comparison for other players (probably has a hand in the above)
Well Pittsburgh won 3 cups with Crosby so if you do a good enough job building a team around a player that good it can pay off in spades.
Chicago 3 with Kane and Toews, Tampa won two with Stamkos, Hedman, Kucherov.
So I think top talent is a real driver towards cups, but its not the only driver and a team management and cap management plays a big role.
That's why I'd rather stay away from Lindholm. Just smacks of a mistake.
I really wish we'd see if 13 or 91 can take that 2c spot.
Yeah, when KC is back I'd like to see some focus on that as I also don't want to pay big for a FA at the deadline.