Barzal going for the anti Cy-young lol
0-17
he would be the leading scorer on the Jets with that number ..........
Barzal going for the anti Cy-young lol
0-17
PP is at 14.75%, PK is 75.44% both well below league average. Corsi stats are nice and all but sometimes don't mean a thing. Maurice is experiencing the same problems he did last year, which led to his resignation before termination. Special teams failures.is this through the same time period? can you show the PP stats by any chance? W/Ls do matter too.
Comrie is now on his 7th season (with his 4th team by the way, considering you've brought the Jets being Rittich's 4th team) with career stats worse than Rittich.
I don't think arguing about backups with you is really worthwhile since you once told me the backup could be something like a 10 point swing in the standings, but I haven't seen anything egregious from Rittich this season (again, only 2 games) so I'm not worried. The team has played what seems like every 3rd day - the main guy is going to get those starts on any team.
Ugh this is what I hate about advanced stats (not a comment on you as a poster personally)PP is at 14.75%, PK is 75.44% both well below league average. Corsi stats are nice and all but sometimes don't mean a thing. Maurice is experiencing the same problems he did last year, which led to his resignation before termination. Special teams failures.
It looks like Spencer Knight is taking over the goaltending duties. His .922 Sv% compared to Bob's .897 stands out and probably accounts for some of the discrepancy in shot metrics vs W/L.
In what sense did he lose out to Wheeler in 2019-20? At age 21, Laine scored more points per game, more points per minute, more points at 5v5, more points in all situations, more goals for per minute, fewer goals against per minute. I think Wheeler narrowly beats him in all-situation primary assists per minute but Laine's a shooter so that makes sense. Wheeler also had better xGA/60, but I'm pretty sure Maurice wasn't looking at that. Maybe zone time? Although even there, Wheeler played way more minutes with Ehlers than Laine did that year - and Ehlers is the Jets' best play-driver.Winnipeg was such a good situation for him. He had Wheeler feeding him 1-timers on the PP with the threat of Scheifele to take attention away from him. He had Ehlers one of the best play driving wingers in the league playing with him at 5v5 and they genuinely tried to find a C for him every season.
Too bad he couldn't beat an aging Wheeler during the 19-20 season when he was given the opportunity (and yes he genuinely lost out to 26 not some Maurice favoritism). He should have been patient, he would have been the 1RW by default in a year or so anyway as 26 aged.
His agent and his sycophants in Finland like Pekka Jalonen did him a disservice trying to convince him that he was a better player than he was at that time. CBJ franchise has been his to take lead and run away with but it hasn't worked out.
I just think they are used way too much without context. You really don't win games with expected goals, it's just some new science that if you shoot more you have a better chance to win. But I think fundamental hockey is zone possession time, you can't get scored on from the other end of the ice, more you work a team in their end, the better chance you have for a quality shot, or drawing a penalty. Which I think explains the Jets dumping the puck alot this year, and not trying to make the fancy seam plays of the past as much, which can end up going the other way quickly, even with a shot on goal. Defending, it's always important to negate odd man rushes, those are potential scoring chances every time. Secondly keep the middle of the ice closed off, between the circles, because that's the most dangerous shooting area. Give up one shot, but ensure the rebounds are not available.Ugh this is what I hate about advanced stats (not a comment on you as a poster personally)
"Advanced stats are nice but sometimes don't mean a thing" - aka "I'll use them when they prove my point and dismiss them when they say im wrong - but I don't need to worry about cognitive dissonance or confirmation bias..." Basically what most advanced stats preachers do.
The reason pomo left here wasn't because the PP sucked. It was because of how the team was responding to his "message". He lost the room and only he had thr balls to do anything about it
In what sense did he lose out to Wheeler in 2019-20? At age 21, Laine scored more points per game, more points per minute, more points at 5v5, more points in all situations, more goals for per minute, fewer goals against per minute. I think Wheeler narrowly beats him in all-situation primary assists per minute but Laine's a shooter so that makes sense. Wheeler also had better xGA/60, but I'm pretty sure Maurice wasn't looking at that. Maybe zone time? Although even there, Wheeler played way more minutes with Ehlers than Laine did that year - and Ehlers is the Jets' best play-driver.
Hes doing exactly what a backup should and at a great cost. Not sure Comrie or Bro would be a better option so far. Of course it's super early but so far so goodBig Save Dave has 2 wins and 1 loss so far. Ill take that and run
Hes doing exactly what a backup should and at a great cost. Not sure Comrie or Bro would be a better option so far. Of course it's super early but so far so good
I wonder if we could pry one away as a project?I just dropped Lafreniere from my fantasy team. Seven points in 17 games this season, that’s rough. I really thought this would be the year he would break out.
Him and Kakko haven’t exactly panned out for the Rangers.
I wouldn't mind trying to get Laff here if the price is right, there is potential in his play it just hasn't translated on the ice just yetI just dropped Lafreniere from my fantasy team. Seven points in 17 games this season, that’s rough. I really thought this would be the year he would break out.
Him and Kakko haven’t exactly panned out for the Rangers.
I wonder if we could pry one away as a project?
There’s no way a backup could cost you that much.
If Hellebuyck is a .920 and we had to play an AHL call up for 1/3rd of a year (a truly disastrous outcome), at 27 games * 30 shots a game * 0.015 worse SV% (assuming .905 for AHL call up), that’s 12.15 more goals than we’d get compared to 27 more games at .920; each +/- 1 goal differential works out to about 1/3rd of a point, so you’re looking at 4 points.
Still a lot to directly attribute to one player’s performance but 10 points? Even in this disastrous case, not even close.