Around the NHL – Part XL - Mod post page 249

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol what? You absolutely cannot, and I think he’s one of those legends like Babe Ruth that people say is the best (in Orr’s case, best at his position) just because people are used to saying it and hearing it for 50 years.
I'll always choose Gretz, but Orr revolutionized the sport when he showed up. He has a case for best ever, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
This is homer bias here, hate to say it. Nobody in their right mind should choose Fox over Makar. Fox is better right now in his own end, but Makar's skating is the difference to me. He can learn to play defense better as his career progresses. Fox is who he is as a skater & that won't likely improve enough to bridge the gap between the two players.

We're lucky to have Fox, but Makar is the better player, IMO.
Makar is a physical specimen, yes. But I'd rather have Fox, really. What Makar will never have is Fox's ability to make something out of nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW and TheDirtyH
I’m saying you don’t usually see big shooters who don’t have huge upper bodies as well. Weber, Chara, Ovechkin, Burns, Laine, Malkin. All huge shooters and all big guys. Thinner big shooters like MSL, Bure and Karlsson have been much rarer. Not sure if Mika and Stammer are big guys — tall and lanky?


Why not?
Because Gretzky > Orr. It won’t be worth the time arguing with anyone saying otherwise.
 
I’m saying you don’t usually see big shooters who don’t have huge upper bodies as well. Weber, Chara, Ovechkin, Burns, Laine, Malkin. All huge shooters and all big guys. Thinner big shooters like MSL, Bure and Karlsson have been much rarer. Not sure if Mika and Stammer are big guys — tall and lanky?


Why not?
Mika and Stamkos are not big. They're ectomorphs, especially Mika.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
This is homer bias here, hate to say it. Nobody in their right mind should choose Fox over Makar. Fox is better right now in his own end, but Makar's skating is the difference to me. He can learn to play defense better as his career progresses. Fox is who he is as a skater & that won't likely improve enough to bridge the gap between the two players.

We're lucky to have Fox, but Makar is the better player, IMO.
He’s basically the new Karlsson.
 
I'll always choose Gretz, but Orr revolutionized the sport when he showed up. He has a case for best ever, IMO.
I think this is exactly my point. Every time someone revolutionizes a sport, they are declared the best ever, when that’s a completely separate thing.

Plenty of goalies revolutionized and re-revolutionized how they play. No one says Plante is the best goalie ever as masks were revolutionary. And him wearing masks led to the rise of the butterfly style, which Roy revolutionized, and most people don’t say he’s the best goalie ever.
 
Now the question is, can the Avs do this Shesterkin or Vasilevsky and who is favored in the final? I think if it’s us COL will be favored but if it’s TBL they will be the favorite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
So the Stanley cup final does not start until 6/18 roughly two weeks off for the Avs. Strong scheduling by the NHL
 
Makar is a phenom. Fox is also a phenom. I don't see either one as a tier above or below the other. People gawk at Makar because he's fast, but Fox just gets it done. Love Ryan Lindgren , but let's be honest about quality of teammates here too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: will1066
I think this is exactly my point. Every time someone revolutionizes a sport, they are declared the best ever, when that’s a completely separate thing.

Plenty of goalies revolutionized and re-revolutionized how they play. No one says Plante is the best goalie ever as masks were revolutionary. And him wearing masks led to the rise of the butterfly style, which Roy revolutionized, and most people don’t say he’s the best goalie ever.
Fair enough, but Orr is a top 4 player of all time at worst depending how you rank them, so it's a little more nuanced than your example regarding goalies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
I just wonder how you can play defense without lats, shoulders, biceps or triceps. It’s almost like The Matrix: “you think that’s air you’re breathing?” … “you think those are your muscles you’re using?”
For hockey players, it's all about leg strength. Being strong on your skates. And he certainly has that.

It's also the reason Kakko ends up on his ass all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CasusBelli
Leaps and bounds? Josi had 10 more points on a far worse team. Josi is mediocre defensively but offensively he’s the best. He had nearly 100 points ffs
It's a shame when a player gets so pumped up that everybody has to hate him lol. Makar really is a fantastic player, but I don't see him as ahead of Fox or McAvoy for example. Hedman and Josi are still holding their own in their 30s.

Seriously, it's ridiculous how much Makar gets talked about only because Devon Toews is his freaking partner and nobody says a word about him. He's probably a top 10 defensemen in the world on his own.
 
Fair enough, but Orr is a top 4 player of all time at worst depending how you rank them, so it's a little more nuanced than your example regarding goalies.
I can’t really say I can fairly rank any defenseman in any order since I didn’t watch players like Orr or Larry Robinson, and I’m not going to start comparing them by points or +/-. Since no one can compare unless you’ve actually watched them, Orr is stuck as the default GOAT defenseman, even though goalies played much differently, and Hull was the only player known for his slapshot.

But whatever, I’ll die on this hill as I know I have no real other candidate as best defenseman ever.
 
I can’t really say I can fairly rank any defenseman in any order since I didn’t watch players like Orr or Larry Robinson, and I’m not going to start comparing them by points or +/-. Since no one can compare unless you’ve actually watched them, Orr is stuck as the default GOAT defenseman, even though goalies played much differently, and Hull was the only player known for his slapshot.

But whatever, I’ll die on this hill as I know I have no real other candidate as best defenseman ever.

I wasn't talking about top 4 d-men of all time, I meant top 4 player of all time. Orr is #2 on my list...ahead of Mario.
 
It's a shame when a player gets so pumped up that everybody has to hate him lol. Makar really is a fantastic player, but I don't see him as ahead of Fox or McAvoy for example. Hedman and Josi are still holding their own in their 30s.

Seriously, it's ridiculous how much Makar gets talked about only because Devon Toews is his freaking partner and nobody says a word about him. He's probably a top 10 defensemen in the world on his own.
Defensemen also have different arches than forwards. Offensive defensemen seem to peak relatively early, likely due to their reliance on speed and agility, whereas two-way and defensive defensemen sometimes don’t peak until 30-33.
 
No...he isn't. Not by any metric or bullshit advanced stat.
:/

what's your problem? Could just say 'I don't think McAvoy is in that tier' and responded to the actual point I made.

McAvoy is definitely among the very best defensemen in the league. Whether you look at stats or not. 10th in Norris voting two seasons ago. 5th a season ago. Likely will be right around 3-5 this year. You're out to lunch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad