Daves a mess
Registered User
- Jan 8, 2014
- 4,401
- 6,051
What's the Eta on wanting out of the NHL?Unless I'm missing something, Kravtsov looks to be scratched again tonight. So much for a change of scenery. Ugh.
What's the Eta on wanting out of the NHL?
I’d put money on this being his last season. Its a matter of months.What's the Eta on wanting out of the NHL?
Contract runs until end of season or has another season?I’d put money on this being his last season. Its a matter of months.
He's an RFA at the end of the year. He could go back to the KHL even if Vancouver gives him a qualifying offer.Contract runs until end of season or has another season?
He's an RFA at the end of the year. He could go back to the KHL even if Vancouver gives him a qualifying offer.
... is the khl? LolReally don’t see him sticking in the NHL. Likely the only destination for him.
In business, these failures usually require a post mortem.Curious is anyone knows. Kravtsov was a failed draft pick. Andersson was a failed draft pick. These were significant assets that were squandered.
Do NHL teams do “root cause analysis” or some other type of process improvement in response to failures like this? I’m trying to come up with a good analogue in the business world. When a pattern like this emerges, large businesses certainly my don’t just ignore it, and will devote significant resources to ensuring it doesn’t happen again.
I understand the draft is a crapshoot, but it’s much less so in the top 10. Why did these kids fail? What has the team done (other than firing the guys that made the picks) to achieve more success in the future?
I don't think there's anything to learn. Andersson was a 'safe' pick in the mold of an ornery Western Canadian captain who hated to lose. If that works out, that's a 10 year piece There's no way to predict he'd literally never improve at skating and have an entitlement complex since he'd always been successful. Think Jamie Benn.In business, these failures usually require a post mortem.
But sports are weird, most of the actors involved in the decision making for Andersson and Kravtsov are already gone.
Unfortunately, it's been my experience that when the decision makers aren't around for the post mortem, the blame just get heaved on them. And that's that.
Curious is anyone knows. Kravtsov was a failed draft pick. Andersson was a failed draft pick. These were significant assets that were squandered.
Do NHL teams do “root cause analysis” or some other type of process improvement in response to failures like this? I’m trying to come up with a good analogue in the business world. When a pattern like this emerges, large businesses certainly my don’t just ignore it, and will devote significant resources to ensuring it doesn’t happen again.
I understand the draft is a crapshoot, but it’s much less so in the top 10. Why did these kids fail? What has the team done (other than firing the guys that made the picks) to achieve more success in the future?
The night Anderson was drafted both my dad and I said doesn't it sound like Chytil has much more upside? We tried hard to move up. They said we had number 7 in a 5 player draft or something like that. When Anderson was drafted they compared him to Jesper Fast. My dad loved Fast but I was like Fast at #7? Bottom line is some drafts you can hardly miss and other drafts are really hard to hit.Curious is anyone knows. Kravtsov was a failed draft pick. Andersson was a failed draft pick. These were significant assets that were squandered.
Do NHL teams do “root cause analysis” or some other type of process improvement in response to failures like this? I’m trying to come up with a good analogue in the business world. When a pattern like this emerges, large businesses certainly my don’t just ignore it, and will devote significant resources to ensuring it doesn’t happen again.
I understand the draft is a crapshoot, but it’s much less so in the top 10. Why did these kids fail? What has the team done (other than firing the guys that made the picks) to achieve more success in the future?
You say there is nothing to learn... But just going off what you're saying, I'm hearing there is a systematic failure in psychological profiling. Either that, or it simply doesn't exist.I don't think there's anything to learn. Andersson was a 'safe' pick in the mold of an ornery Western Canadian captain who hated to lose. If that works out, that's a 10 year piece There's no way to predict he'd literally never improve at skating and have an entitlement complex since he'd always been successful. Think Jamie Benn.
Krav, well, there's similarly no reason to expect him to be a creampuff weakling in his D-4 year. You're looking at a generic skill package in a 6-4 filled out frame which is a unicorn. People claim to love boom/bust picks till they brick on em. Happens.
This is what I assume happens. The turnover in sports orgs is fast. It’s still weird to see these massive businesses care so little about innovation and process improvement.In business, these failures usually require a post mortem.
But sports are weird, most of the actors involved in the decision making for Andersson and Kravtsov are already gone.
Unfortunately, it's been my experience that when the decision makers aren't around for the post mortem, the blame just get heaved on them. And that's that.
2017 wasn't a great draft but there are plenty of players drafted later, some way later, that carved out some decent to good careers so far. Back to back top 10 busts really hurt with only Cuylle to show for it.2017 was a shit draft. The Rangers desperately tried to move up to 3 to get Petterson but it takes two to make a deal.
I get the approach in 2017. Andersson was the safe pick and Chytil was the home run swing. The fact that Lias’ busted is just how it goes sometimes.
2018 was very much Gordie Clark and the rest of they scouting staff thinking they are the smartest in the room. No reason they should have went off board and not taken a guy like Wahlstrom, Dobson, Farabee etc
If there are some good players drafted in later rounds that indicates all the teams in the NHL passed on them multiple times so it wasn't about us. We also have had our share of good players that other teams passed on. Happens to everyone.2017 wasn't a great draft but there are plenty of players drafted later, some way later, that carved out some decent to good careers so far. Back to back top 10 busts really hurt with only Cuylle to show for it.
It was a six man draft. Cody glass was made of glass and has done nothing, Nolan Patrick before the concussions looked like the forward version of Laf/Kakko, total ham and egger. Nothing special to his game at all.The night Anderson was drafted both my dad and I said doesn't it sound like Chytil has much more upside? We tried hard to move up. They said we had number 7 in a 5 player draft or something like that. When Anderson was drafted they compared him to Jesper Fast. My dad loved Fast but I was like Fast at #7? Bottom line is some drafts you can hardly miss and other drafts are really hard to hit.
Theres basically no way the Rangers or anyone else has an edge in psychologically profiling 17 year olds. Think about what you're saying.You say there is nothing to learn... But just going off what you're saying, I'm hearing there is a systematic failure in psychological profiling. Either that, or it simply doesn't exist.
I was talking about the first round after we picked 7th. 10-15 guys picked later that we wish we had instead of the bust Andersson. There is no excuse for back to back top 10 busts.If there are some good players drafted in later rounds that indicates all the teams in the NHL passed on them multiple times so it wasn't about us. We also have had our share of good players that other teams passed on. Happens to everyone.
No excuse always makes me laugh. Is there an excuse for a top 20 bust? What are allowable excuses for teams to miss on high draftpicks because they all do including Edmonton who also drafted McDavid and Leo.I was talking about the first round after we picked 7th. 10-15 guys picked later that we wish we had instead of the bust Andersson. There is no excuse for back to back top 10 busts.