SettlementRichie10
Registered User
- May 6, 2012
- 10,200
- 8,412
But there was also plenty of overrating of lesser players at the expense franchise icons.
Mike Richards being more important to the championship teams than Kopitar is one classic example. Mike Richards was a sub replacement player in 2014 and plenty of people continue to say "The Kings wouldn't have 2 rings without him"
Richards was a fairly replaceable forward by 2014, but he was a critical player in 2012, along with our best forward period in the unsuccessful 2013 run. Kopitar was completely MIA in 2013.
Clearly Kopitar was “more important” in 2012 and 2014. I’ve literally never heard anyone claim otherwise. But Richards absolutely set a tone in the Vancouver series, and provided critical secondary center production, PKing, etc. throughout the entire run.
So the Kings likely win 2014 without Richards, but they definitely don’t win 2012.