Around the league part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoldenBearHockey

Registered User
Jan 6, 2014
10,236
4,315
Yeah I guess I only ever saw the report of them discussing Quick's plan beyond the end of the contract.

I genuinely apologize GBH, I have Axl on block (after he started harassing me in PMs during his last break) so I didn't see what or who you were responding to.

No doubt it was something bordering on crazy knowing Axl (he needs to be banned) and your response was likely the correct response.

Again, sorry for my response and I hope that clears things up.

Dude I misread him with the Quick thing, hence the whole f*** subtlety ....thought he was talking about Blake's responsible for Quick winning the cup back in the day etc...
 

SmytheKing

Registered User
Apr 7, 2007
971
1,408
I may be wrong but didn't Quick refuse to go to C-bus because he knew he would be the third guy and in the press box? Or was the Jackets plan always to flip him somewhere else?
No. They told his agent pretty much right away that they were flipping him and that he didn't need to report to the team. They told him they would try to get him to a contender. Columbus had no interest in keeping him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigermask48

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
What do you mean by have the conversation first? Are you suggesting that Blake should have gotten Quick's 'OK' to make the trade that would improve the team going forward? Do you really think that's how trades work? - "Hey Jonathan, we really need to what's best for the team and ultimately what's best for you. Is it cool if we trade you to CBJ?"

I don't know how it went down, what was said, what wasn't said .. how Quick feels about it, how Blakes feels about it.....and guess what, no matter how much blind hate you have for Blake, you don't know either! This was taken from the LA Times article:

>>Blake conceded it was unfortunate he couldn’t deliver the news to Quick in person after the Kings’ 6-5 shootout victory at Winnipeg on Tuesday. Blake didn’t go on the trip, and when Hockey Night in Canada reporter Elliotte Friedman broke the news on Twitter, Blake couldn’t wait. He spoke to Quick by phone and separately to Drew Doughty and Anze Kopitar, now the last players left from the Cup teams. Were they shocked? Disappointed? “Both,” Blake said.<<
back when LA dealt Carter Blake was quoted saying something along the lines of "guys liek Quick and Carter although have no trade protection deserve to know and be part of the process" something like that. Sorry could not spend more time trying to find the actual quote.

I am just saying Blake contradicted himself.
 

Axl Rhoadz

Binky distributor
Apr 5, 2011
4,942
3,808
back when LA dealt Carter Blake was quoted saying something along the lines of "guys liek Quick and Carter although have no trade protection deserve to know and be part of the process" something like that. Sorry could not spend more time trying to find the actual quote.

I am just saying Blake contradicted himself.
Sure, maybe...depending on how you look at it. In a perfect world, I'm sure you sit down with a player and talk it out....however, I think Carter and Quick were in two very different situations. Did Carter have a no-move clause where they would have to get his approval for a trade? Quick didn't, right? Quick's contract was going to be up and the Kings weren't bringing him back. They had an opportunity to get something for him because they weren't going to play him -- can you imagine the grief you guys would give Blake for letting Quick go sign with NYR in the offseason knowing he could have got SOMETHING for him?
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
Sure, maybe...depending on how you look at it. In a perfect world, I'm sure you sit down with a player and talk it out....however, I think Carter and Quick were in two very different situations. Did Carter have a no-move clause where they would have to get his approval for a trade? Quick didn't, right? Quick's contract was going to be up and the Kings weren't bringing him back. They had an opportunity to get something for him because they weren't going to play him -- can you imagine the grief you guys would give Blake for letting Quick go sign with NYR in the offseason knowing he could have got SOMETHING for him?
Carter did not have trade protection.
I think Quick was only part of the trade last year as LA needed to move cap out to make it work, and needed to open a roster spot for Korpisalo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yankeeking

psych3man

Registered User
Dec 17, 2019
698
915
Outside Chicago
re: hurting Quick’s feelings--
The Knights don‘t give a shit about hurting someone’s feelings, they care about winning.
I’ll take a double dose of that for the Kings any time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Axl Rhoadz

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
re: hurting Quick’s feelings--
The Knights don‘t give a shit about hurting someone’s feelings, they care about winning.
I’ll take a double dose of that for the Kings any time.
agree in principle but the Knights have not been around long enough to have a player with the Tenure that Kopitar, Brown, Quick, Etc have. Will be interesting to see if they will be as cut throat with the players seen as their core last year. Moving Smith shows maybe they will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psych3man

kingsfan28

Its A Kingspiracy !
Feb 27, 2005
40,352
9,428
Corsi Hill
Quick WON A CUP because of what Blake 'did'..which eventually resulted to him being signed by his dream team to finish out his career. I'm sure Quick is good with it!

Everyone wants Blake to have balls, make bold moves, not be tied to the vets. When he actually does just that, we get out the pitch forks. Twilight Zone...

My issue with the trade was he never told Quick it might happen, then when he was delt, he didn't have the guts to fly there and tell him in person. Blake and Luc bs excuse about no time and too busy to go to WPG to tell him was the worst part. Too many people knew Quick was traded before he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yankeeking

Axl Rhoadz

Binky distributor
Apr 5, 2011
4,942
3,808
My issue with the trade was he never told Quick it might happen, then when he was delt, he didn't have the guts to fly there and tell him in person. Blake and Luc bs excuse about no time and too busy to go to WPG to tell him was the worst part. Too many people knew Quick was traded before he did.
So your issue is directly related to total speculation. You have absolutely ZERO knowledge in how things were handled between the parties at hand. Cool.
 

Fishhead

Registered User
Jul 15, 2003
7,306
5,764
PNW
Weren't Woodcroft and the Oilers banking on a new defensive system this year that was supposed to improve their GAA greatly? Well, it's not working. If McDavid is out for closer to two weeks than one they may be in quite a hole.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,999
17,925
To put that into perspective. Boston, in their record setting season, had 12 regulation losses last year.

4-in-38 translates to 9 losses over the course of 82 games.

2 of VGK's 4 losses were with Quick in net.
 

KingsFan7824

Registered User
Dec 4, 2003
19,528
7,603
Visit site
Weren't Woodcroft and the Oilers banking on a new defensive system this year that was supposed to improve their GAA greatly? Well, it's not working. If McDavid is out for closer to two weeks than one they may be in quite a hole.

hahahah-burn.gif
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,803
17,034
Great Lakes Area
I'm trying to think of the last Kings I really wanted to fail after leaving the team. Roenick? There has to be someone more recent than that,

Cryin Ryan Smyth.

1. Demand a trade for $$$

2. Play dumb and accuse Bob Mackenzie of lying “I have no idea where that came from, I haven’t requested a trade”

3. Come clean about demanding a trade but then play the “safety of my children card”

4. Never apologized publicly for calling BM a liar.

Ryan Smyth was the Western Canadian Alexei Yashin


Longterm contracts are the devil. Sure, there is security, but they do often end up with a bitter taste in the mouths of the players and the fans.

At the very least, Kopitar's didn't turn him into a pariah like Brown and Quick. Though, I do often wonder if his style of keeping gas in the tank for the long haul reduced the impact of letting it all hang out earlier in his career. Who knows what could have happened if he went for broke during his prime years.

Doughty's play will likely be serviceable at a minimum towards the end of his deal, just a question of whether his highly competitive nature will allow him to accept a lesser role without creating any issues. Based on the recent article and his outward vocalizations at the end of 2021, that is an area of concern.
I love them for guys who are 21-23, I think there is a reason that almost every young star signs one, it's mutually beneficial to both the player (security, market value+ in younger seasons) and to the team (control through entire prime, cap savings on market value years 4-8).

Of course with the way the Kings claim they are building with this "slow cook" even if players were to break out at 25-26, then its time time to pay that guy a contract that takes him into his 30's, where you end up paying huge money for declining assets (Doughty). At least with Drew though the Kings got 3 seasons (2 of them Norris caliber out of his ELC).
 
Last edited:

BigKing

Blake Out of Hell III: Back in to Hell
Mar 11, 2003
11,668
12,648
Belmont Shore, CA
google.com
Count me as a guy that has zero excitement for Martinez or Quick getting a Cup with Vegas because I hate Vegas. They've got two Cups already. To be a Kings fan and actively root for Vegas--outside of SR10 since he lives there--is mind boggling to me.

Sure, I am fine with them playing well individually but you'll never catch me rooting for a Vegas/Anaheim/San Jose Cup win no matter the former King on their roster. My mom could be 4th line RW and I'd still want them to lose.
 

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
So your issue is directly related to total speculation. You have absolutely ZERO knowledge in how things were handled between the parties at hand. Cool.
When multiple sports site report on it, and players say how it shocked them is it speculation?
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,803
17,034
Great Lakes Area
Count me as a guy that has zero excitement for Martinez or Quick getting a Cup with Vegas because I hate Vegas. They've got two Cups already. To be a Kings fan and actively root for Vegas--outside of SR10 since he lives there--is mind boggling to me.

Sure, I am fine with them playing well individually but you'll never catch me rooting for a Vegas/Anaheim/San Jose Cup win no matter the former King on their roster. My mom could be 4th line RW and I'd still want them to lose.

I know in this case it wasn't as drastic, but I am still amazed by people who switched what team they supported based on an individual player. In all my years following all the sports, those Mike Richards people who became active Kings fans after that trade was just so bizarre to me. Could anyone imagine becoming Islanders or Devils fans had Kopi been traded there 5 years ago? Its one thing to wish the player well, but to become a fan posting on messageboards and switching team allegiance?

I wonder, did they all go back to being Flyers fans?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BigKing

kingsholygrail

11-7-3 We're back. It's over.
Sponsor
Dec 21, 2006
82,857
17,408
Derpifornia
Count me as a guy that has zero excitement for Martinez or Quick getting a Cup with Vegas because I hate Vegas. They've got two Cups already. To be a Kings fan and actively root for Vegas--outside of SR10 since he lives there--is mind boggling to me.

Sure, I am fine with them playing well individually but you'll never catch me rooting for a Vegas/Anaheim/San Jose Cup win no matter the former King on their roster. My mom could be 4th line RW and I'd still want them to lose.
I didn't actively root for Vegas. The situation was just win-win for me. Former Kings getting new rings or Vegas getting defeated. Both outcomes were optimal for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad