King'sPawn
Enjoy the chaos
- Jul 1, 2003
- 22,850
- 23,350
But the Kings won with Brown when he wasn't "the emotional presence" either. He was also part of the core that "quit on Sutter."I think the issue brought up is management hitching the wagon again to the same players who couldn’t do it alone in their prime years, doubling down with expensive middle-roster players to add to them, and not addressing the elephants in the room that needed to be for the cup teams to succeed.
As was said, you absolutely cannot take anything away from Anze and what he has done for this team, but there is a significant argument to be made that he just isn’t the emotional presence that gets the most out of the roster when it matters.
Zero playoff round wins for the “core” players without Richards, Stoll, Greene, Williams, Scuderi, Mitchell. That’s a pretty damning statistic.
If the question is "does Kopitar act as the type of leader who fires up the team?" The answer is clearly no. I won't dispute that. The frustrating part of this conversation is the blaming of Kopitar for the Kings not winning anything under his leadership, when previous management provided the supplemental leadership for the team to be successful.
So, why is keeping Kopitar as a leader the worst thing management has done, instead of, you know, just constructing a better team? Does anyone really think if Kopitar was the captain instead of Brown in 2012, they wouldn't have won a playoff series, with the same team composition?
Teams need fiery leaders just as much as they need subdued leaders. Having someone able to charge the team emotionally IS important, I agree. But having leaders who keep a relatively even keel in the face of adversity is also valuable.
Which is why the 2012-14 teams were so good. They had a healthy blend of emotional involvement and stoicism that would allow the team to amp themselves up as well as keep themselves in check.