Tells me their high end guys will get going…I'm just not all that impressed with Vegas relative to the Avs so far. One team is loaded with depth, the other carried by high end guys despite Vegas having their fair share of high end guys.
Records are very close and the Avs arguably have better underlying numbers.
I mean Eichel is over PPG, Stone is around his usual pace and Karlsson is exceeding his usual pace. Theodore also when healthy is at his usual pace. Not sure how much better it can get, at least offensively.Tells me their high end guys will get going…
We are too early to say definitive, but as I watch across the league I certainly wouldn’t put the Avs in the top 5. The method of winning doesn’t look sustainable for the playoffs. Lack of depth is a big problem. Goaltending has entered the fray too.
You could be right, I just don’t see it. Vegas looks better in the games I’ve watched. Head to head was obvious.I mean Eichel is over PPG, Stone is around his usual pace and Karlsson is exceeding his usual pace. Theodore also when healthy is at his usual pace. Not sure how much better it can get, at least offensively.
When healthy, the Avs IMO are right there with Vegas.
Vegas is on par with the Avs IMO. The only thing separating them is Vegas being almost three percentage points higher Sv%.
Avs have a better discrepancy in scoring chances and high danger chances on the year.
I think it's fair to say that Vegas might be better than the Avs currently. They didn't lose nearly as much as Avs did after their cup. They basically lost Smith and that was that. We lost Burakovsky, Kadri, and most importantly, Landeskog. 3 top-6 players right there. Those have still not been replaced. And can't be replaced because of the flat cap. But we just got to hope that Drouin, RyJo and Tatar somehow get better and Landeskog returns and is actually contributing.You could be right, I just don’t see it. Vegas looks better in the games I’ve watched. Head to head was obvious.
HFAvs being overly critical of their team? What? Never!We really underrate our own team here IMO.
Flip Avs and Vegas, and put oilers in the toilet and I agree.Yea Oilers were massively underperforming until the coaching change and Boston was overperforming. Those were pretty obvious.
Kings underperforming is not good news for the rest of the league.
To me the West is:
Tier 1: Kings
Tier 2: Vegas
Tier 3: Avs, Stars, Oilers
Tier 4: Jets, Canucks
Yeah I pretty much agree. Kings need a better option in net for safety… but lots of things can change.Yea Oilers were massively underperforming until the coaching change and Boston was overperforming. Those were pretty obvious.
Kings underperforming is not good news for the rest of the league.
To me the West is:
Tier 1: Kings
Tier 2: Vegas
Tier 3: Avs, Stars, Oilers
Tier 4: Jets, Canucks
Avs, Stars and Oilers are all in tier 2. Canucks don't belong here, either - record now be damned.Yea Oilers were massively underperforming until the coaching change and Boston was overperforming. Those were pretty obvious.
Kings underperforming is not good news for the rest of the league.
To me the West is:
Tier 1: Kings
Tier 2: Vegas
Tier 3: Avs, Stars, Oilers
Tier 4: Jets, Canucks
Flip Avs and Vegas, and put oilers in the toilet and I agree.
Because of the nature of NHL, I just refuse to see Kings in a different tier than us, let alone two tiers above us. For me, there are contenders, playoff teams, bubble teams, and teams that suck.
Boston was so hot last year and look what became of them. As did with Tampa the year they beasted regular season and then got swept by Columbus...
Atta boy, ERod
For what it's worth, LA seems like a team built for playoffs. Top to bottom. I don't want to question their goaltending after we won the cup with Kuemper with the worst save percentage of SC winning goalie in 30 years.100%. How often do we see the teams put in the top tier not win the Cup? Playoffs are very different than the regular season.
There are some parallels, and some conclusions to take from the regular season, but not all. IN fact, there are many weaknesses from top teams that get exposed in the playoffs that didn't in the regular season.
We've been on both sides of that. Defensive depth getting exposed. Lack of size and physicality getting exposed.
How often do we see the "deep team" beaten by the team with more high end talent and star players in the conference or Cup finals? Almost always in the finals.
Hockey is just different in the playoffs. We should know that by now.
For what it's worth, LA seems like a team built for playoffs. Top to bottom. I don't want to question their goaltending after we won the cup with Kuemper with the worst save percentage of SC winning goalie in 30 years.
But if I had to pick a fault, are there enough elite players? Kopitar and Doughty used to be ones. PLD is a good center, but hardly a Hart candidate. Then again, the Blues won in 2019, when their top players were O'Reilly, Tarasenko, Pietrangelo and Binnington. Nothing spectacular either. It can be done.
Yeah and came along with a first. I don’t think Faber had much offense, but damn he’s good defensively.This Brock Faber is a damn solid dman. Is this the guy they got for Fiala?
Yah hes damn responsible for being a young dman. Great get for the Wild sadly.Yeah and came along with a first. I don’t think Faber had much offense, but damn he’s good defensively.
Tie game now. The German scores one for the Oilers and one for my fantasy team.JFC Wild leading the Oilers 3-2 while getting outshot 30-11