AvsMakar08
Registered User
Even better then Keller? Did you forget all the hype that Keller got (even on this forum)?Coyotes look like they’ll be fun.
Cooley looks like he has potential to be the best player that franchise has ever had
Even better then Keller? Did you forget all the hype that Keller got (even on this forum)?Coyotes look like they’ll be fun.
Cooley looks like he has potential to be the best player that franchise has ever had
I swear if that pendejo doesnt get atleast 90 points im going to hate him more then I hate Darcy Kuemper and Ryan Graves.Nah. They're finished. @The Kingslayer took Tage in fantasy. That was the straw that broke the camel's back.
He got drafted in the 4th round of my draft this year. Last year he went in the 19th round and one year he didnt even get drafted.Keller's been underrated. Maybe this year he won't be.
Keith Tkachuk is the best player they had so far. If Cooley gets to that level he going be very special player.Coyotes look like they’ll be fun.
Cooley looks like he has potential to be the best player that franchise has ever had
Prior to the draft, I was dreaming of CMac finding a way to convert one of our LDs and a first or two into Hayton and Crouse. I'm still not sold on RyJo, but I've learned enough to give CMac and the Avs pro-scouts the benefit of the doubt by now.Hayton is someone I'll be watching this year
Yeah I was pushing for Hayton and Luostarinen.Prior to the draft, I was dreaming of CMac finding a way to convert one of our LDs and a first or two into Hayton and Crouse. I'm still not sold on RyJo, but I've learned enough to give CMac and the Avs pro-scouts the benefit of the doubt by now.
Kakko is better. He’s not a small boi.Jack Hughes so good.
Kakko is better. He’s not a small boi.
Oh I certainly thought Kakko would be better than he has become (and I think he will still be a top 6 player), but his skating isn't good and his shot is so easy to read for goalies. He's another early man strength kid which further makes the case of bet on talent.I know we're having fun here, but I legit thought Kakko would be a star in NHL and could challenge Hughes for the best player of his draft title.
The way he played in Liiga was amazing, he seemed to have great vision, made some unbelieveable plays, strong like an ox, wouldn't get knocked off the puck as a teenager agains 30 year old men.. There were some Forsberg/Jagr/Rantanen like moments. Quite a many of those actually.
Honestly I'm very disappointed with his development. Wish he could skate a little better, that would help him a lot. Still trust that he will be a top six player in his prime.
He has better hands than Rantanen. Better vision as well I think. Rantanen is a better skater, and has a MUCH better shot.Oh I certainly thought Kakko would be better than he has become (and I think he will still be a top 6 player), but his skating isn't good and his shot is so easy to read for goalies. He's another early man strength kid which further makes the case of bet on talent.
I don’t know if he has better hands or vision than Rants. Especially the vision side… Rants has massive creativity and sees lanes (and executes on them) better than almost any NHLer. He’s not Kuch or McDavid there… but the tier below.Kakko was better than Rantanen before and during his draft year. Like not even close. Arguably, Kakko was better than Barkov when he was drafted.
It's beating the old drum, but the Rangers could've handled him so much better. When it was obvious after few games he was not ready for the NHL, should've sent him to the AHL. Instead, they have played him like a middle-6/bottom-6 winger, without any meaningful special teams time. What you get is Kakko is now a very good two way player (he was probably worse than Laine when he was drafted and that's saying something), but who seems to have lost some of that offensive flash and decisiveness. He hasn't been deployed in an offensive role, so no wonder.
Now hopefully, Laviolette will have the patience to stick with having him next to Kreider and Zibanejad. Last year Kakko started with them and that line was dominating possession, but didn't score enough. So Gallant stuck it in the bin. That was the best Kakko has looked in the NHL, he fits that line well.
He has better hands than Rantanen. Better vision as well I think. Rantanen is a better skater, and has a MUCH better shot.
Well, Hughes can become a top-5 NHL center as soon as this season so to become such a level would be a tall task.I don’t know if he has better hands or vision than Rants. Especially the vision side… Rants has massive creativity and sees lanes (and executes on them) better than almost any NHLer. He’s not Kuch or McDavid there… but the tier below.
Kakko was clearly and early developer and people thought it would continue… instead the gap narrowed. I still think he can be a good player… he just isn’t anywhere near Hughes.
Well, they need to move someone to do that and no team is helping them out.When Ottawa adds Norris and Pinto, they have impressive depth. Probably would want to get a better goalie.
Well, they need to move someone to do that and no team is helping them out.
While I think it’s absolutely true the Rangers mishandle prospects (Quinn and Gallant could not have mishandled Kaako, Lafreniere, and Andersson any worse) it can also be true that those were just…really bad picks.Kakko was better than Rantanen before and during his draft year. Like not even close. Arguably, Kakko was better than Barkov when he was drafted.
It's beating the old drum, but the Rangers could've handled him so much better. When it was obvious after few games he was not ready for the NHL, should've sent him to the AHL. Instead, they have played him like a middle-6/bottom-6 winger, without any meaningful special teams time. What you get is Kakko is now a very good two way player (he was probably worse than Laine when he was drafted and that's saying something), but who seems to have lost some of that offensive flash and decisiveness. He hasn't been deployed in an offensive role, so no wonder.
Now hopefully, Laviolette will have the patience to stick with having him next to Kreider and Zibanejad. Last year Kakko started with them and that line was dominating possession, but didn't score enough. So Gallant stuck it in the bin. That was the best Kakko has looked in the NHL, he fits that line well.
He has better hands than Rantanen. Better vision as well I think. Rantanen is a better skater, and has a MUCH better shot.
They were slam dunk picks at the time. Like I said, Kakko showed skill and performance unmatched by ANY Finnish prospect before him, bar Barkov. I watched Rantanen and Kakko both live, and Kakko was the better one.While I think it’s absolutely true the Rangers mishandle prospects (Quinn and Gallant could not have mishandled Kaako, Lafreniere, and Andersson any worse) it can also be true that those were just…really bad picks.
KK and Laf will be legit NHLers, but not more than that, and it won’t happen in Manhattan.
Kaako kind of reminds me of Martin Lapointe. An absolute phenom in youth hockey who never came even close to meeting initial expectations but still had a successful NHL career.