Why not? I mean, yeah, that'd be troublesome, but Chychrun does everything we'd need in another blueliner and is a year younger than Werenski so age isn't a concern. We can draft more RD easily enough - we've got the picks, even after trading one.
If Ceulemans + Foudy + later of the two 1sts is enough for Chychrun, I'd be perfectly wiling to go for that. I'm not in a hurry to lose any of those guys, but IMO Chychrun could be worth it. I'd really love to add a good defensive RD instead, but those aren't available at the moment. He's not a strong need per se, but a Werenski/Chychrun/Gavrikov LD is a competitive ace in the hole, and that's something we could certainly use.
Frankly, I think the Jackets could easily pick this up. It's just a question of whether or not Kekalainen opts to build the team that way.
* * *
...we actually kind of
just undercut this argument with what we said we were going to be getting back for Seth Jones. Folks were insisting we had no chance at getting
both Boqvist and the 1st, let alone adding this year's 1st as well. And yet...
I mean, admittedly, Arizona doesn't have a Jarmo Kekalainen running things, but still. Let's not turn around and start perpetuating the bullshit that we found so annoying a few short months ago.
* * *
They'd probably look better to the common fan if 1) they ever got traded
during their primes as opposed to on the tail end of them and 2) Arizona was ever actually capable of having more than one truly good defenseman at a time.
"He was mediocre all along" isn't exactly a rational conclusion when your finally-out-on-other-teams data generally comes on the wrong side of 30.