I don't agree with this at all. Sometimes it's a "fluke" team that wins it but that doesn't happen very often.
Does the best team usually win the cup or not? I'd take the field every year over the best team, that is my point.
You put yourself in the best position to win, but even if there is a stacked team, it is unlikely they win the cup over the field, so at some point even though they are favored, they lose.
I believe NYI/MTL or similar teams are built on the idea of limiting mistakes, they play better teams and will win based on mistakes, not on skill or this "outworking" that people keep bringing up, that is just someone's reasoning for lower-skilled players winning.
I do think MTL/NYI are better than some teams that made it to the playoffs, but from what I have seen, a lot of their game is built on not losing, instead of winning.
I am sure the typical people will roast me for this opinion, but I just think it takes a lot of things going right for a team to win the cup.
A couple of our posts go in, Price doesn't stand on his head, Tavares stays in the series, this could be a completely different conversation, the same people cursing the big 4 may be praising them.