Are you disappointed that they are sticking with the core?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.

Are you disappointed that they are sticking with the core?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
You don't think Eichel played with capable players?
It's an easy alley-oop. I'm not even asking to remove the biased minutes of Marner's PK time. Eichels XGF% is abysmal. He barely breaks 50%...and that was even after the sabres iced a better defensive core with guys like Faulk. He cheats defensively to generate points and fails at even that.
Eichel is over-rated by a lot.

So again, unless you're comparing apples to apples then a straight comparison of points/points-per-game/points-per-60 isn't going to tell you what you think it will.

I don't believe Eichel's linemates to date compare to Matthews and Tavares, no.

Nor do I think a scoring-winger role commands the same on-ice responsibility as a top-line centre does.
 
No. A little (okay, a lot) frustrated but honestly I think there are way worse choices to be made than giving up on Mitch Marner. I can understand wanting to bet on that kind of talent figuring it out. It might not be the choice that I would have made, but I believe that it makes sense. I hope to hell that Dubas is right on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4thline
I'm disappointed Dubas isn't fired. I have a small bit of faith in Shanny...it's fading but I still want to have hope. I understand why they don't want to sell on a talent like Marner this early, just hoping we get the right development/coaching for him and the rest of our team. This buddy buddy system isn't working. These kids need to start competing, play hard and not be so entitled. I watched Barzal the other night and my goodness is there ever a difference.

I believe Kyle was able to sell Shanny on his vision and that led to the subsequent management changes. Then, lacking any real management experience BS got on board with the Dubaplan and they presented things to the MLSE Board as their joint vision for the Leafs going forward. Shanahan has painted himself into a corner and will go down with the ship along with Dubas, trying all the while to get more time from MLSE for both of them. He has gone too far to take corrective measures and the only thing that can save him is if the Board reaches past him to punt the GM or if they finally do something next playoff.

I don't think it is selling on talent to move Marner as the return would be substantial along with some cap relief. It is really whether a "big 4" setup is compatible with a hard cap environment. Three of the four remaining teams are clubs that play strong systems and roll lines rather than running on pure star power although Vegas with Stone and Pie is not identical to the Habs. TB has managed to beat the flat cap this year through skilled manipulation so the bottom of their lineup isn't from a garage sale. They don't have the cap as an excuse if the Isles dump them but almost every other team is going to be in the same boat as the Leafs where they can't quite compete because of the lack of value contracts.

The flat cap exacerbates things but you can see it coming with the death of the "middle class" deals and the NLPA being walked right into that by battling to support the top 10% of salaries at the expense of the majority of their members. If the Leafs had signed the big 3 for remotely team friendly deals and had not added Tavares I think it could have easily worked although I expect Dubas would have used up all the cap space on other deals and they would still have Keefe. Maybe even Keefe could win if they had Pietrangelo too :)

Anyways, the big 4 kind of represents feudal society where a tiny elite has almost everything and the serfs get by on scraps. That failed too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EK392000
How does that make sense with the context of the post you're replying towards? If they were giving the Leafs better odds of winning, it would reduce the payout for the team you're saying they believe will lose and spike the payout for who wins. Do you think before posting?

"Vegas" doesn't actually set their odds based completely on the real probabilities of an event occurring. If "Vegas" making the Leafs a lower odds favorite doesn't necessarily mean they believe they have (for example) the third best chance of winning the cup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: justashadowof
That Dom guy from the athletic said the chances of the Leafs losing in the first in every one of the last 5 years was 1.4% so this team's "achievements" are indeed noteworthy!

Bottom line, no matter how much the team embarrasses itself by playing it's worst when it all comes down to one deciding game, you'll be here making a complete fool of yourself by telling everyone how good the team is.

Looking forward to thousands of posts from you between now and our next playoff game telling us what a great team we have, how Dubas is your soulmate and everything he does is pure genius.

:biglaugh::biglaugh:

Bottom line, they'll be one of the odds on favorites again next year, and every year they're together.

And vegas will agree.
 
Arizona would be perfect for Mitch. They don't give a hoot about the salary cap because they can only afford the cap floor. Marner is already paid his ridiculous overpay. They won't care if he's a playoff no show because they probably won't make it anyway and if they do their fans don't really care anyway as proven by the abysmal attendance record.
 
"Vegas" doesn't actually set their odds based completely on the real probabilities of an event occurring. If "Vegas" making the Leafs a lower odds favorite doesn't necessarily mean they believe they have (for example) the third best chance of winning the cup.

Given the narratives around these leafs, why would you think vegas would think theyd be overrated instead of underrated?
 
leafs have no dogs. I would kill for a Wendell Clark clone on this team. dubas thought he was getting a great leader in JT but instead we got the big mute. Tavares is like that neighbor that mows his grass for 5 hours a day and when you see him and have to make conversation you're dying inside because of how excruitiatingly boring the conversation is. I bet the guy really sits there and talks about fertilizing for 3 hours while everyone tilts their heads. Of course they made him captain though because he is a nice person. It's just so lame this team. They're soft and boring, zero grit.
 
I need a woman to defend me like Mr Marner does for Mitch

Take my wife ...please ... ;)

Half Italian / half Irish and 100% a force of nature... breeding those two gene pools is like breeding a wolverine with a piranha ... but she's the best thing to ever happen to me.

I outweigh her by 100lbs but good money is on her to win a cage fight ... ;)
 
Given the narratives around these leafs, why would you think vegas would think theyd be overrated instead of underrated?

Probably for same reason there's a 20 year waiting list for the highest priced tickets in the league to watch a team that hasn't won a playoff round in 17 years and a Cup in 54.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cobra777 and rumman
I've never laughed at you but I do smile when I see your Avatar picture ... what a hell of a hockey player.

TBH when people go for that home run everyone is laughing at you remark, I kind of feel sorry for them. It's a tactic you often see with abusive personalities when they want to isolate their target from the rest of society.
I was a big fan of Wendel. Even back then, some people loved to attack him with homophobic slurs by calling him Wendy. Some people....
 
So again, unless you're comparing apples to apples then a straight comparison of points/points-per-game/points-per-60 isn't going to tell you what you think it will.

I don't believe Eichel's linemates to date compare to Matthews and Tavares, no.

Nor do I think a scoring-winger role commands the same on-ice responsibility as a top-line centre does.
Like I said, Marner outperformed him from his first year.
 
Well he's not...

Jack - 375 GP - 139G, 216A, 355P
Mitch - 355GP - 103G, 255A, 358P

Statistically Mitch is better.

Jack had herniated disc surgery in the off season, a pretty serious operation, one that has never been done on a NHL player before. Which gives you context on just how bad Jacks injury was.

So you got a guy who had spinal surgery, that has never been done before on a NHLer, who for his career performed at a lower pace vs a guy with no spinal surgery and who is a a better point producer, kinda an open and shut case eh?


Lol just going by stats. Watch the games dude. They rnt in the same universe as a player. Anyone who has seen them both play can spot the differences in 10 seconds
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJK
So again, unless you're comparing apples to apples then a straight comparison of points/points-per-game/points-per-60 isn't going to tell you what you think it will.

I don't believe Eichel's linemates to date compare to Matthews and Tavares, no.

Nor do I think a scoring-winger role commands the same on-ice responsibility as a top-line centre does.
Wow you sound like someone who actually watches and understands hockey.
 
Are you disappointed that they are sticking with the core?

I'll wait to see if that's actually the case. As much as they 'want' to keep a core, players become available at different points that you weren't expecting.

Am I disappointed if they keep the 'core 4' and somehow improve on it? No. Am I disappointed if they do NOTHING and come back with the same group? Yes - I imagine so given the nature of their historic defeats in the playoffs.

And before I hear about how they have no cap space, or can't do this because of that, I hear it every year for everything and they somehow make something happen that people were saying wasn't so. I'm content with waiting and evaluating their position come September. It'll be a busy summer for the league, and I see no reason why the Leafs couldn't be apart of that if they so choose.
 
Bottom line, they'll be one of the odds on favorites again next year, and every year.

And vegas will agree.

I don’t know about you, but using Vegas as the appeal to authority to establish the Leafs contending feels incredibly depressing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224
Probably for same reason there's a 20 year waiting list for the highest priced tickets in the league to watch a team that hasn't won a playoff round in 17 years and a Cup in 54.

Take a look around HF or listen tl the radio and tell me how many leafs fans would bet on the leafs.
 
leafs have no dogs. I would kill for a Wendell Clark clone on this team. dubas thought he was getting a great leader in JT but instead we got the big mute. Tavares is like that neighbor that mows his grass for 5 hours a day and when you see him and have to make conversation you're dying inside because of how excruitiatingly boring the conversation is. I bet the guy really sits there and talks about fertilizing for 3 hours while everyone tilts their heads. Of course they made him captain though because he is a nice person. It's just so lame this team. They're soft and boring, zero grit.
I like Tavares, he has good skill like the other 3, but watching him closely, he has no overdrive button. None of the core does.

Very little emotion. All these 4 together just lack any of the bite or next level gear required for the playoffs. Individual skill does not win and this core will not IMO. It must change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: weems

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad