Confirmed Trade: [ANA/NYR] Jacob Trouba for Urho Vaakanainen and 2025 4th round pick

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,752
15,511
Folsom
Makes sense for both sides. Rangers wanted this done in the offseason and Trouba hasn't done anything to make them want to keep him. Ducks get a good bet that they can turn what they paid to get Trouba into better assets later. Ducks weren't going to get him on waivers with the Sharks there most likely so they had to give up something to make it work.
 

Forge

Blissfully Mediocre
Jul 4, 2018
13,474
16,876
Vincent Clortho School for wizards
The Rangers biggest problem is they're relying on a 33 year old Panarin to put the team's offense completely on his back. They have the cap now to do something to try and fix it but will probably have to do something fairly desperate. Who is even going to be shopped around for this season? Claude Giroux? Taylor Hall? Mikael Granlund? The options aren't too overwhelming. More flexibility in the offseason, but that team's window is likely closing.

but it's really the defense that needs help, right?
 

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,632
44,144
Orange County, CA
What part of this makes it a “terrible trade for Anaheim”? Do people think we’re going to miss our extra 4th round pick or our 7th defenseman? Do people think the $8M cap hit is going to prevent us from doing something when we had over $20M in space? Or are people just hurt that the Rangers have $8M in cap space now?
 

SI90

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
87,003
65,767
StrongIsland
Trouba is worth it if he's actually willing to be a leader in Anaheim. He's overpaid, but frankly it's not a bad contract for a team rebuilding.

However... it sounds like he was forced out of New York against his will. Not sure if this will go the way Verbeek is hoping.
The bar isn’t high. They’re really young and their captain is Gudas lol
 

StewieP19

Registered User
Dec 13, 2022
384
164
I'm pretty sure Ny Rangers will do another move in next couple of day they now got cap space to work on it.
 

Zajacs Bowl Cut

Lets Go Baby
Nov 6, 2005
73,366
48,095
PA
What part of this makes it a “terrible trade for Anaheim”? Do people think we’re going to miss our extra 4th round pick or our 7th defenseman? Do people think the $8M cap hit is going to prevent us from doing something when we had over $20M in space? Or are people just hurt that the Rangers have $8M in cap space now?

trading positive value for an objectively bad player is a bad move. Trading positive value for an objectively bad player that makes $8 million/year is an objectively terrible move.

It isn't that complicated. No one said it is going to "stop" the Ducks from doing anything. It still is a horrible trade.
 

LaffyTaffy13

Registered User
May 10, 2022
1,638
2,734
What part of this makes it a “terrible trade for Anaheim”? Do people think we’re going to miss our extra 4th round pick or our 7th defenseman? Do people think the $8M cap hit is going to prevent us from doing something when we had over $20M in space? Or are people just hurt that the Rangers have $8M in cap space now?
Nailed it. People need to consider where the ducks are at right now. This move frankly helps them
 

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,889
21,107
So he vetoed trades to Columbus and Detroit but accepts trade to Anaheim, is staying close to his wife and toddler important to him or not? I am confused.
What's there to be confused about, he had a 15 team no trade list. Columbus and Detroit were on it, Anaheim wasn't. His preference was likely to stay with the Rangers but his contract meant he had to be willing to pick half the teams in the League he'd be willing to go to if the Rangers made a trade.

It's strictly business. Not everything should be reduced to moralistic terms. He was unwilling to go to Columbus/Detroit, he was less unwilling to go to Anaheim. His reasons are his own. Both sides were exercising their contractual rights the parties willingly negotiated and signed onto at the time of entering the contract. Nobody is a scoundrel, a hustler or a villain here.
 

LaffyTaffy13

Registered User
May 10, 2022
1,638
2,734
trading positive value for an objectively bad player is a bad move.

It isn't that complicated. No one said it is going to "stop" the Ducks from doing anything. It still is a horrible trade.
4th round pick = positive value? Trouba has 1 year left. This trade is a win-win for both sides
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daz28

Bowski

Just a piece.
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2004
1,510
2,051
Kitchener
Party Time in Anaheim!
40133b80533d1113e4856fe19369283ff03ae64d_00.gif


Good riddance. Now he can have all the "accidents" he wants on the West Coast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shello

BrockLobster

Registered User
Feb 11, 2013
10,004
8,446
Long Beach, NY
What part of this makes it a “terrible trade for Anaheim”? Do people think we’re going to miss our extra 4th round pick or our 7th defenseman? Do people think the $8M cap hit is going to prevent us from doing something when we had over $20M in space? Or are people just hurt that the Rangers have $8M in cap space now?

The latter
 

ucanthanzalthetruth

#CatsAreChamps
Jul 13, 2013
28,719
34,643
What part of this makes it a “terrible trade for Anaheim”? Do people think we’re going to miss our extra 4th round pick or our 7th defenseman? Do people think the $8M cap hit is going to prevent us from doing something when we had over $20M in space? Or are people just hurt that the Rangers have $8M in cap space now?
I view Trouba as a 3-4 million dollar player. Rangers were completely over the barrel here. Instead, the Ducks take on the whole contract and add a pick? I'm shocked the Rangers didn't have to add a 2nd or a 1st and in fact got a pick back considering Anaheim took on the full salary.
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
55,376
34,865
Brooklyn, NY
As a life long Rangers fan I wouldn’t wanna play for a Drury team. Between Goodrow and now Trouba that’s no way to treat your players. Almost makes me think the team is giving up on him.

You're right the Rangers shouldn't try to improve their team. We can have the most happy terrible team in the league with you as GM. What a take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shello

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,325
52,508
Winston-Salem NC
What part of this makes it a “terrible trade for Anaheim”? Do people think we’re going to miss our extra 4th round pick or our 7th defenseman? Do people think the $8M cap hit is going to prevent us from doing something when we had over $20M in space? Or are people just hurt that the Rangers have $8M in cap space now?
I mean I get where you're coming from, but this is situation where Anaheim absolutely should have been getting a positive asset of some sort in return. The fact that they didn't even if they lost literally nothing of value is the issue here.
 

BMOK33

Registered User
Oct 5, 2005
28,014
5,084
The Rangers biggest problem is they're relying on a 33 year old Panarin to put the team's offense completely on his back. They have the cap now to do something to try and fix it but will probably have to do something fairly desperate. Who is even going to be shopped around for this season? Claude Giroux? Taylor Hall? Mikael Granlund? The options aren't too overwhelming. More flexibility in the offseason, but that team's window is likely closing.
I assume Panarin is not going to be re-signed. They have to sign Kakko/Miller/Schneider/Igor and maybe one of Jones or Lindgren. He'd have to agree to a crazy pay cut and I think some team would still give him 3 years and like 25 mill
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,406
11,225
Charlotte, NC
What's there to be confused about, he had a 15 team no trade list. Columbus and Detroit were on it, Anaheim wasn't. His preference was likely to stay with the Rangers but his contract meant he had to be willing to pick half the teams in the League he'd be willing to go to if the Rangers made a trade.

It's strictly business. Not everything should be reduced to moralistic terms. He was unwilling to go to Columbus/Detroit, he was less unwilling to go to Anaheim. His reasons are his own. Both sides were exercising their contractual rights the parties willingly negotiated and signed onto at the time of entering the contract. Nobody is a scoundrel, a hustler or a villain here.

Anaheim was on it. It was specifically reported that he waived his NTC to accept a trade there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad