- May 29, 2010
- 46,684
- 35,647
But the Jets weren't more inconsistent in the 2nd half than the first half of the season in terms of shot attempts or shots on goal. In fact, they were on the positive side of the ledger more often in the second half.Just to be clear .... I have always blamed the goalies and bad shootingluck.And bad passing, bad decision making, bad receiving of passes, bad NZ turnovers, etc. And, as I said yesterday, I am happy to accept your explanation of so often playing catchup as at least a major contributor. And that goes back to goaltending, again in part. I don't think there is any single explanation for the whole thing.
There were quite a few games where they were outshot by wide margins, or only managed to even out the shot count later in the game when score effects took over. Those games where the shot count stayed heavily against them could have been evened out by other games where they outshot the opponents. The aggregate stats wouldn't show that. The problem then would be inconsistency. What would cause that inconsistency is anyone's guess.
The metrics make it very clear that the shot metrics were better in the second half (5v5). The goaltending, finishing and PP were worse in the second half.
It's not really close, in any of the data.