I had a contrary viewpoint at the time, though I wasn't posting here to share it.
Briefly...
The Jets slump coincided with both an uncharacteristic cratering of goaltending and a shooting slump. So, in a number of those games they ended up going down quickly with two or three soft goals against, and then couldn't mount a comeback. There is nothing that looks worse than a team that's playing from behind and can't finish. But in many of those games, the Jets were actually matching or beating teams in shot attempts and danger, but losing (often disheartening losses).
Here is a graphical representation of the Jets shooting / goaltending deficit game-by-game over the season. What is obvious to me is that in the first 40-50 games, the Jets very often had the advantage in terms of save % or were quite close to opponents, but during that awful stretch the Jets were regularly on the losing end of the shooting/saving percentages, often caved in substantially. (Note: segments of the lines inside the red "0" line represent games where the Jets had a save% deficit, and vice-versa).
View attachment 731793
The graph is spectacular...
If you turned it 47 degrees counter-clockwise...
It could be the new symbol to go inside the Jets roundel emblem...