Not sure where Chisholm would have any leverage in an arbitration hearingChisholm will go to arbitration I am guessing. Kup signs a 1 year deal and I am going to guess we try to sign VIlardi to the Scheif contract if not it will be a 2 year deal around 4.5 per year
Chisholm doesn't have arbitration rights.Chisholm will go to arbitration I am guessing. Kup signs a 1 year deal and I am going to guess we try to sign VIlardi to the Scheif contract if not it will be a 2 year deal around 4.5 per year
Might have to overpay. I wouldn’t be opposed to a 7x7 contract. It’s a big bet, but even if he plays as a winger, I think it would pay off.Chisholm doesn't have arbitration rights.
Jets tend to be cautious with their contracts, but it might be a smart bet to try to get Vilardi long-term. But he might not be easy to persuade to commit that long to the Jets.
If I'm Vilardi I take a two year bridge... Chevy probably will offer low knowing that he needs to re-up Ehlers and Connor fairly soon too - I doubt Vilardi is ever higher than a $7m range anyway...Might have to overpay. I wouldn’t be opposed to a 7x7 contract. It’s a big bet, but even if he plays as a winger, I think it would pay off.
If I'm Vilardi I take a two year bridge... Chevy probably will offer low knowing that he needs to re-up Ehlers and Connor fairly soon too - I doubt Vilardi is ever higher than a $7m range anyway...
The cap is going up like crazy over the next few years. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays with Connor, Ehlers and Perfetti for two years, he gets 70-80 points and is after 10M on a 95M cap.If I'm Vilardi I take a two year bridge... Chevy probably will offer low knowing that he needs to re-up Ehlers and Connor fairly soon too - I doubt Vilardi is ever higher than a $7m range anyway...
Don't disagree... but Chevy has his five year spending plan and moves accordingly - its bridges for everyoneI don't see either Ehlers or the org wanting to continue the relationship after next year. Ehlers hasn't been used correctly and the org isn't going to want to pay Fly what he's likely worth.
You are probably right and yet...the door is wide open for both sides, with the departure of Wheeler (and possibly Scheif). The team has 2 years to give him the opportunity to play prime 5x5 and pp minutes and a lot can change in a season. He obviously has to stay healthy, but his metrics when playing are outstanding.I don't see either Ehlers or the org wanting to continue the relationship after next year. Ehlers hasn't been used correctly and the org isn't going to want to pay Fly what he's likely worth.
I think he gets moved next off-season unless he plays almost injury free and puts up big numbers. People complain about him not getting the minutes but the guy can't stay healthy getting the minutes he is. He played 72, 82 and 82 games his first 3 years. Since then he has missed substantial time. I'd do Stanley and Ehlers for Konecny.I don't see either Ehlers or the org wanting to continue the relationship after next year. Ehlers hasn't been used correctly and the org isn't going to want to pay Fly what he's likely worth.
I think he gets moved next off-season unless he plays almost injury free and puts up big numbers. People complain about him not getting the minutes but the guy can't stay healthy getting the minutes he is. He played 72, 82 and 82 games his first 3 years. Since then he has missed substantial time. I'd do Stanley and Ehlers for Konecny.
I agree. I stated in another post Vilardi at 2 x $5 mill which is probably too high.Chisholm will go to arbitration I am guessing. Kup signs a 1 year deal and I am going to guess we try to sign VIlardi to the Scheif contract if not it will be a 2 year deal around 4.5 per year
Chisholm will go to arbitration I am guessing. Kup signs a 1 year deal and I am going to guess we try to sign VIlardi to the Scheif contract if not it will be a 2 year deal around 4.5 per year
You are probably right and yet...the door is wide open for both sides, with the departure of Wheeler (and possibly Scheif). The team has 2 years to give him the opportunity to play prime 5x5 and pp minutes and a lot can change in a season. He obviously has to stay healthy, but his metrics when playing are outstanding.
Injuries aside, the underutilization of Ehlers has been one of my many disappointments with the team these past few years. They don't deserve to keep him if they don't give him more opportunity. And through it all, he has been a consummate professional--no moping, no passive aggressive body language, often taking personal responsibility for team underperformance.
It would be great if he did, but 70-80 might be a tad optimistic as he barely even broke 40 last year. Dubois was here 3 years and only broke 60 once.The cap is going up like crazy over the next few years. I wouldn’t be surprised if he plays with Connor, Ehlers and Perfetti for two years, he gets 70-80 points and is after 10M on a 95M cap.
It would be dependent on him staying healthy of course. He paced for 53 points last year with 16 mins per game. Give him 18-19 mins and lots of power play time and I could see 70 points if he plays 82.It would be great if he did, but 70-80 might be a tad optimistic as he barely even broke 40 last year. Dubois was here 3 years and only broke 60 once.
Play him with KFC and a winger like Nino/Iafallo. I'd even try Kup for 10 or so games.It would be dependent on him staying healthy of course. He paced for 53 points last year with 16 mins per game. Give him 18-19 mins and lots of power play time and I could see 70 points if he plays 82.
With no trades, this is how I would probably start.
KFC Villardi Ehlers
Nino Scheif Perfetti
Iafallo Lowry Kupari
Barron Names Appleton
Gus
PP1
Perfetti
Ehlers Scheif. KFC
Morrisey
PP2
Nino
Villardi Iafallo Schmidt
Pionk
I personally like Cole on his off wing but switching him and Nino makes sense for sure.I'd swap wings for Perfetti and Nino. I also think Cole needs to be the HB player on whichever PP unit he's on. I don't think putting him down low is the best use of his skills.
I'd also prefer to play Cole at center but he may have to wait until Mark is traded (if we are using him as a self rental until a team meets Chevy's ask)
I personally like Cole on his off wing but switching him and Nino makes sense for sure.
I do agree that Cole should be on the HB on PP1 but don't see the coaches playing him there over Ehlers and Connors, at least to start. I prefer him down low on PP1 as opposed to playing him HB on PP2. I think it is imperative he sees PP1 time all year regardless of his spot.
I think he gets shot at centre this year but I really like the way him and Scheif play together and I think Nino would be a perfect compliment to their skill.
I love the 3rd line in my configuration and the 4th is a significant improvement to last year.
As whole, I think (without any trades) this team is significantly ahead of this time last year with a lot of room for growth.