Adam da bomb
Registered User
- May 1, 2016
- 13,137
- 10,121
Unfortunately , seems like organization disagrees.We simply need to move on from Big Stan. He’s not part of the solution, here.
Unfortunately , seems like organization disagrees.We simply need to move on from Big Stan. He’s not part of the solution, here.
We simply need to move on from Big Stan. He’s not part of the solution, here.
I don't get it either. People who keep talking about how good his "transition game" is don't know the meaning. To start transitioning from defense to offense you first need to get the puck from the other team. He's been terrible at that. His passing from his own end hasn't been good. He goes for the 80 foot pass too often. I think the idea he is this passing wizard comes from being in the offensive zone where he does look great.Ville isn't even on the roster yet and he's PK/PP already - this guy is so over rated on the board is laughable.
I'd like to see him turn into a NHL player too but will wait until he can stick before proclaiming him anything other than a 3rd pair maybe
I see him as a serviceable 7th dman during the season who you don't want in your line up in the playoffsSeems like a really good kid and teammate. I would like to see him get a fresh start in another organization.
The biggest issue on D for the Jets this offseason for me is the Dillon issue. If the team let him walk that D core becomes soft as melted ice cream. Chevy will need to add at least one new D in that case with sandpaper and grit. A guy like Zadorov fits that bill, but I'd venture to say that since he and Dillon are going to be in the same range dollars wise I'd rather re-sign Dillon. I expect his new contract to be the same or less than the 3.9 he got on the last one.
As far as Heinola goes I still think he could be a diamond in the rough. If we look back a bunch of years Morrissey didn't look anywhere near what he is now when he came into the league. He still could be a wildcard if he gets to 75% of what Mo is back there and would give the Jets good puck moving on two units instead of just the top unit.
Best way to accomplish that is being aggressive and probably creative with a trade of Pionk to open up cap space and a Schmidt buyout to really Revamp that defense. Don’t just paint over the rust.
They didn't lose to Colorado becaues of lack of D toughness. It was lack of D skating and puck moving ability. (as far as defenseman issues go)
You think the failure of the Jets to clear the front of the net didn’t contribute to the many goals from the point that went in through a screen or were tipped? That didn’t make a difference?
Nobody has "cleared the front of the net" for 30 years now. D are taught to try to box out and tie up sticksYou think the failure of the Jets to clear the front of the net didn’t contribute to the many goals from the point that went in through a screen or were tipped? That didn’t make a difference?
I see him as a serviceable 7th dman during the season who you don't want in your line up in the playoffs
Some will complain about a 1st round pick turning into that but it could have been worse. With the exception of Tage Thompson, nobody drafted after him in the 1st round has had a dramatically better NHL carrreer so far
Then there's Olli Juolevi lol at 5th overall lol
Dillon was the only positive +/- in the playoff because he was the only guy clearing the crease for Hellebuyck to see and knocking guys down so they couldn’t get rebounds. Simple playoff hockey.They didn't lose to Colorado becaues of lack of D toughness. It was lack of D skating and puck moving ability. (as far as defenseman issues go)
If you actually read my post, I said "in the first round". Nobody who went in the late second or beyond should have even been a consideration at 18???????
There is quite a long list other than just Thompson.
Kyrou, Debrincat, Girard, Lindgren, Hronek plus quite a few other lesser lights who have still far exceeded Stanley.
I see him as a serviceable 7th dman during the season who you don't want in your line up in the playoffs
Some will complain about a 1st round pick turning into that but it could have been worse. With the exception of Tage Thompson, nobody drafted after him in the 1st round has had a dramatically better NHL carrreer so far
Then there's Olli Juolevi lol at 5th overall lol
Yup. Interestingly, Stanley is already closing in on thr top 50% of games played by historical 18th overall picks (32nd out of 55 players his age or older picked at that draft spotno team pitches shut outs with their drafting. We got spoiled hitting on our first 6 1st round picks.
Yup. Interestingly, Stanley is already closing in on thr top 50% of games played by historical 18th overall picks (32nd out of 55 players his age or older picked at that draft spot
If you actually read my post, I said "in the first round". Nobody who went in the late second or beyond should have even been a consideration at 18
None of the guys you mentionned were projected to go mid first. Anyone can look at a draft in hindsight and say "those guys were idiots for not picking *insert player whose success was out of left field*". There's a reason everyone else passed on those guys too until they were chosen.
I mean Byfuglien was picked in the 8th round FFS. Does that mean that he should have been a first rounder? Of course not, because nobody knew how good he was going to be at the time of the draft
Isn't Colin Miller a RHD who had some good looks in the (albeit small) amount of playoff time he had this year?
The D collapses in that colorado series because jomo is locked down defending mackinnon and the 2nd and third lines feast on pionk. Analytics or basic eye test told colorado to send pressure and he will panic and he did... then it all trickles down from there
Then add samberg playing his offside just so we can roster Stan... not because Stan was playing better than Schmidt or miller but I guess we just wanted to make it work I guess
Replace pionk and this d core is likely fine instead we will keep him and rebuild everything else
I like your comment on the second pair - there were issues there with Pionk and the pair were critical to our success.The second pairing has been one of this teams weaknesses for a while now. Bones made the decision to make the third pairing an issue as well with his deployment.
I like your comment on the second pair - there were issues there with Pionk and the pair were critical to our success.
The third pair was off and one most of the season - Smitty, Stan and Samberg all had periods where they struggled so there was a lot of juggling -
I don't get the comment on Bones making the 3rd pair an issue - he made a lot of moves with this group and some you probably don't agree with (so whats new) - but that doesn't mean he made that pair an issue.
What made the blueline an issue is the fact that it simply isn't very good - and coaching a poor lineup is a challenge but certainly not an issue the coach created.