bustamente
Fraud Supporter
If the VGK make another huge move before the deadline to stack their team and they happen to go on and win the SC again with a lineup well north of 100m well that's on the owners for allowing it.
So has Vegas traded for Crosby yet for a 1st in 2030 but only if they win the Cup , then it's a 7th this year ? No, Maybe tomorrow on deadline day.
He's the guy who brought in the salary cap in the first place!I will be celebrating Bettman’s retirement/firing/arrest/death. Whatever comes first.
Unless the f***er is still in charge when I’m dead
Exactly. The Jets are tied for 2nd in the NHL in points%, have a +42 goal differential, Hellebuyck is having a Vezina season, they're top 10 in all the fancystats...but let's keep our powder dry, because how good might this team be in 3 years with Colby Barlow on the 3rd line?guess trading mtl's 2nd and a prospect would cripple this franchise
The league could attach a cap value to NTC/NMCs. Arguably, since teams are using these clauses as part of a player's compensation, it should count against the cap.It'll never happen. The PA wants the player to have more control over their future and the owners want the teams in those markets that aren't on NTCs to be successful.
The league could attach a cap value to NTC/NMCs. Arguably, since teams are using these clauses as part of a player's compensation, it should count against the cap.
Say a percentage of the cap per year, so the value wouldn't inflate away with cap increases. 1.5% for a full NMC (currently that would be $1.25M), 1.25% for a full NTC ($1.04M), 1% for a partial NTC of 10 or fewer teams ($835,000).
Players could (at their option) waive their clause before the season begins and the team would get that much extra cap space back. They could waive later in the season but there'd be no cap relief for their team or the team they're traded to for that year.
This would put downward pressure on salaries...but since no actual salary dollars are changing hands, the players would end up paying less escrow. You'd definitely see fewer NMCs and NTCs.
Apparently only 2 teams were pushing for the playoff cap and nobody else wanted it Strange, if true.The owners can easily vote in any off-season to apply the cap during the playoffs - very simple fix... for this loophole at least
That being said salary retention is kind of a problem now too
They probably looked at the valuation of Tampa and Vegas before and after winning the cup and realized that they all want to circumvent the cap within the next ten yearsApparently only 2 teams were pushing for the playoff cap and nobody else wanted it Strange, if true.
Nobody in that negotiation table is going to entertain this idea, most likely not in any capacity. Players want to choose their destination, and teams are OK with it (and certainly not OK with footing the bill for those NTC payments).How about this if a player wants a NTC for certain teams he has to paid for it.
One team is free.
2-4 teams is $100,000
5-9 team is $200,000
10-15 teams is $500,000
Or
Lets says there’s 50 players who have the Jets on the NT list … the Jets should be able to get an increase on the team salary cap.
10 players gets $1,000,000 bonus
15 players gets $2,000,000 bonus
20 players gets $4,000,000 bonus
That would even the playing field
The Jets aren't the only team that gets the short end of the NTC stick, though.Nobody in that negotiation table is going to entertain this idea, most likely not in any capacity. Players want to choose their destination, and teams are OK with it (and certainly not OK with footing the bill for those NTC payments).
The league could attach a cap value to NTC/NMCs. Arguably, since teams are using these clauses as part of a player's compensation, it should count against the cap.
Say a percentage of the cap per year, so the value wouldn't inflate away with cap increases. 1.5% for a full NMC (currently that would be $1.25M), 1.25% for a full NTC ($1.04M), 1% for a partial NTC of 10 or fewer teams ($835,000).
Players could (at their option) waive their clause before the season begins and the team would get that much extra cap space back. They could waive later in the season but there'd be no cap relief for their team or the team they're traded to for that year.
This would put downward pressure on salaries...but since no actual salary dollars are changing hands, the players would end up paying less escrow. You'd definitely see fewer NMCs and NTCs.
Agreed. The player movement and contract terms play a pretty minor role in the overall CBA negotiations. They are mostly used as carrots and sticks by the owners to get players to agree take less total money.Nobody in that negotiation table is going to entertain this idea, most likely not in any capacity. Players want to choose their destination, and teams are OK with it (and certainly not OK with footing the bill for those NTC payments).
Once I let go of being mad or trying to educate people about deadline madness I just realized I could sit back and enjoy the show.
Keep it coming, boys