Rumor: All Purpose Trade Proposals, Speculation and Rumours - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gm0ney

Unicorns salient
Oct 12, 2011
14,915
14,369
Winnipeg
guess trading mtl's 2nd and a prospect would cripple this franchise
Exactly. The Jets are tied for 2nd in the NHL in points%, have a +42 goal differential, Hellebuyck is having a Vezina season, they're top 10 in all the fancystats...but let's keep our powder dry, because how good might this team be in 3 years with Colby Barlow on the 3rd line?
 

Gm0ney

Unicorns salient
Oct 12, 2011
14,915
14,369
Winnipeg
It'll never happen. The PA wants the player to have more control over their future and the owners want the teams in those markets that aren't on NTCs to be successful.
The league could attach a cap value to NTC/NMCs. Arguably, since teams are using these clauses as part of a player's compensation, it should count against the cap.

Say a percentage of the cap per year, so the value wouldn't inflate away with cap increases. 1.5% for a full NMC (currently that would be $1.25M), 1.25% for a full NTC ($1.04M), 1% for a partial NTC of 10 or fewer teams ($835,000).

Players could (at their option) waive their clause before the season begins and the team would get that much extra cap space back. They could waive later in the season but there'd be no cap relief for their team or the team they're traded to for that year.

This would put downward pressure on salaries...but since no actual salary dollars are changing hands, the players would end up paying less escrow. You'd definitely see fewer NMCs and NTCs.
 

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,699
16,578
The owners can easily vote in any off-season to apply the cap during the playoffs - very simple fix... for this loophole at least

That being said salary retention is kind of a problem now too
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

Jets

All hat, no cattle.
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2010
3,782
3,526
Winnipeg
The league could attach a cap value to NTC/NMCs. Arguably, since teams are using these clauses as part of a player's compensation, it should count against the cap.

Say a percentage of the cap per year, so the value wouldn't inflate away with cap increases. 1.5% for a full NMC (currently that would be $1.25M), 1.25% for a full NTC ($1.04M), 1% for a partial NTC of 10 or fewer teams ($835,000).

Players could (at their option) waive their clause before the season begins and the team would get that much extra cap space back. They could waive later in the season but there'd be no cap relief for their team or the team they're traded to for that year.

This would put downward pressure on salaries...but since no actual salary dollars are changing hands, the players would end up paying less escrow. You'd definitely see fewer NMCs and NTCs.

I don't see them removing NTCs or limiting them. If a team like Vegas or Dallas can include a NTC as an extra carrot to sign all the top FAs, and the only downside to them is that the Winnipegs and Buffalos of the league lose out, you can bet the 2/3rds of the league it benefits will vote to keep it this way.
 

raideralex99

Whiteout Is Coming.
Dec 18, 2015
5,185
10,398
West Coast
How about this if a player wants a NTC for certain teams he has to paid for it.
One team is free.
2-4 teams is $100,000
5-9 team is $200,000
10-15 teams is $500,000
Or
Lets says there’s 50 players who have the Jets on the NT list … the Jets should be able to get an increase on the team salary cap.
10 players gets $1,000,000 bonus
15 players gets $2,000,000 bonus
20 players gets $4,000,000 bonus
That would even the playing field
 

Maukkis

EZ4ENCE
Mar 16, 2016
10,721
7,597
How about this if a player wants a NTC for certain teams he has to paid for it.
One team is free.
2-4 teams is $100,000
5-9 team is $200,000
10-15 teams is $500,000
Or
Lets says there’s 50 players who have the Jets on the NT list … the Jets should be able to get an increase on the team salary cap.
10 players gets $1,000,000 bonus
15 players gets $2,000,000 bonus
20 players gets $4,000,000 bonus
That would even the playing field
Nobody in that negotiation table is going to entertain this idea, most likely not in any capacity. Players want to choose their destination, and teams are OK with it (and certainly not OK with footing the bill for those NTC payments).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

jetsmooseice

Up Yours Robison
Feb 20, 2020
1,923
2,459
Nobody in that negotiation table is going to entertain this idea, most likely not in any capacity. Players want to choose their destination, and teams are OK with it (and certainly not OK with footing the bill for those NTC payments).
The Jets aren't the only team that gets the short end of the NTC stick, though.

I'm not saying the practice has to be ended completely as I agree there wouldn't be an appetite for that, just that there is a need for some limitations beyond what already exists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snowkiddin

tbcwpg

Moderator
Jan 25, 2011
16,673
20,135
The league could attach a cap value to NTC/NMCs. Arguably, since teams are using these clauses as part of a player's compensation, it should count against the cap.

Say a percentage of the cap per year, so the value wouldn't inflate away with cap increases. 1.5% for a full NMC (currently that would be $1.25M), 1.25% for a full NTC ($1.04M), 1% for a partial NTC of 10 or fewer teams ($835,000).

Players could (at their option) waive their clause before the season begins and the team would get that much extra cap space back. They could waive later in the season but there'd be no cap relief for their team or the team they're traded to for that year.

This would put downward pressure on salaries...but since no actual salary dollars are changing hands, the players would end up paying less escrow. You'd definitely see fewer NMCs and NTCs.

That's a good idea but I don't see the league or players incentivized to change NMCs or NTCs at all.
 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,131
31,205

expects more tweaking
said adding nino/names showed we can improve our team without it costing a ton
called it a buyers market, might not need to spend a lot to find new additions
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jets 31 and surixon

Blue Shakehead

because lol Jets
Mar 18, 2011
3,126
1,957
www.becauseloljets.com
Nobody in that negotiation table is going to entertain this idea, most likely not in any capacity. Players want to choose their destination, and teams are OK with it (and certainly not OK with footing the bill for those NTC payments).
Agreed. The player movement and contract terms play a pretty minor role in the overall CBA negotiations. They are mostly used as carrots and sticks by the owners to get players to agree take less total money.

Owners Offer: ELC's will be 6 years instead of 3 and max contract term is 5 years. Players will become free agents at 35. Concessions sales are not to be included in hockey related revenue. Player's percentage of revenue will be reduced from 50% to 40%.

They will give up everything on that list to get anything close to the last one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad