Rumor: All Purpose Trade Proposals, Speculation and Rumours - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,393
12,493
How does that address my question?



Why will you point out that Connor has done it in 16 fewer games without at the same time pointing out that he has done it more minutes? Deal with that and then we can move on to why the difference in minutes.
Because Ehlers has played more minutes?
KC has played 586 minutes and Ehlers has played 705 minutes.

Deal with that and I don't have to move on, KC is the better player.
Interested in how you will move the goal posts now...
 

Jack7222

Registered User
Mar 17, 2021
964
2,440
Because Ehlers has played more minutes?
KC has played 586 minutes and Ehlers has played 705 minutes.

Deal with that and I don't have to move on, KC is the better player.
Interested in how you will move the goal posts now...

1708721091041.png
o_O

Your icetime is also just for 5 on 5, where Ehlers has 29 points and Connor has 18.
 
Last edited:

Moon Man

Registered User
Oct 3, 2015
1,209
293
Can Scheifele Ehlers and Conner just be on the same line together?

It wouldn't be the best defensively, but it would light opponents up.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,848
31,218
Because Ehlers has played more minutes?
KC has played 586 minutes and Ehlers has played 705 minutes.

Deal with that and I don't have to move on, KC is the better player.
Interested in how you will move the goal posts now...

Move the goalposts? What are you on about.

Those are 1 season numbers. I'm talking larger sample sizes, like career. Same goalposts I have been using all along.

You are just going to insist that Connor is the better player based solely on points scored, goals against don't count. I don't like +/- but it is a quick and dirty response to your 1 season number. This year, KC, -5 - Ehlers +19.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,848
31,218
It’s probably coaches defer too much to schief’s. if they just point out that the team is better if he plays with fly instead of kfc there wouldn’t be the problem.

I expect that is correct - and up to a point, it should be. The vet leaders on the team should have some input into line mates. I expect that is also why Nino is always with Lowry too.

OTOH, Scheif should be asked to take one for the team and allow KC to be used to fix the 2nd line. Its all in how it is presented. :laugh:

I honestly think that KC would be a better fit with Perfetti and Monahan .... or Namestnikov if Monahan doesn't work out. The only way to find out for certain though, is to try it.
 

hn777

Registered User
Apr 22, 2019
674
1,243
Can Scheifele Ehlers and Conner just be on the same line together?

It wouldn't be the best defensively, but it would light opponents up.
Wouldn't be the worst either. In 174:46 minutes of ice time together over the last three seasons, they are GF 10 - GA 6 with positive Corsi and slightly positive expected goals numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moon Man

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,393
12,493
Move the goalposts? What are you on about.

Those are 1 season numbers. I'm talking larger sample sizes, like career. Same goalposts I have been using all along.

You are just going to insist that Connor is the better player based solely on points scored, goals against don't count. I don't like +/- but it is a quick and dirty response to your 1 season number. This year, KC, -5 - Ehlers +19.
Actually, you responded to a Post of mine where I had posted numbers on the season. Maybe you misread it and thought I was talking about their careers.
 

Jets 31

This Dude loves the Jets and GIF's
Sponsor
Mar 3, 2015
23,107
66,242
Winnipeg
While i wouldn't mind Neo getting a shot on the 2nd line it's not going to happen because Bowness loves Neo, Lowry and Appleton. Can't fault him for that because that line has been very good this year especially at shutting down the other team's best line.
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,393
12,493
Play Ehlers and KC with Monahan.
Play Perfetti and Volare with Scheif...maybe it'll bring Perfetti out of his funk? Maybe it's just getting used to the long season and all the travel that is hampering his play?
Either that or move Nino into the top 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adam da bomb

raideralex99

Whiteout Is Coming.
Dec 18, 2015
5,188
10,404
West Coast
Play Ehlers and KC with Monahan.
Play Perfetti and Volare with Scheif...maybe it'll bring Perfetti out of his funk? Maybe it's just getting used to the long season and all the travel that is hampering his play?
Either that or move Nino into the top 6.
I would rather see Monahan Volardi and Perfetti. Perfetti and Ehlers should never been on the same line because of their size. Two small wingers on one line doesn't work unless one of them is a bulldog.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NikoEhlers

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,201
19,884
Wouldn't be the worst either. In 174:46 minutes of ice time together over the last three seasons, they are GF 10 - GA 6 with positive Corsi and slightly positive expected goals numbers.
See, this is why it's insane to use stats like these to draw conclusions

Based on the time you posted and assuming an average shift length of 45 seconds, they played 233 shifts together

10 times, something good happened, or 4.3% of their shifts

6 times, something bad happened, or 2.5% of their shifts

In ABSOLUTE TERMS, there was a 1.8% increase in good over bad

It's super common to see people use RELATIVE terms in order to try to overatate a small absolute affect. That would be a GF% or xGF or something like that. Even then, the differences are almost negligible

I once did the math on the difference between a 55% Corsi player and a 45% corsi player because:

1. That was the in fashion fancy stat of the day

And

2. Those numbers are on thr outer ends of the distribution and people felt comfortable saying a 55% CF player is superior to the 45%CF player...

Turns out the difference between the two is the 55%CF player is ON THE ICE (not even necessarily directly related to the shot attempt) for one more shot attempts for their team than the 45% player every nine shifts
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,047
28,469
If I was Lowry, I too would be interested in having Nino carry the line. Not much suggests that Lowry deserves any 5v5 minutes above the fourth line level at this point, so Nino will mask some of the offensive woes.
don't disagree. but just not sure if that'll happen.

i do think nino would provide some additional size and net-front presence in the top-6 along with his usual good 2-way play.
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,393
12,493
I would rather see Monahan Volardi and Perfetti. Perfetti and Ehlers should never been on the same line because of their size. Two small wingers on one line don't work unless one of them is a bulldog.
You mean Ehlers and Connor?
I said Perfetti with Volare?
 

JetsFan815

Replacement Level Poster
Jan 16, 2012
19,643
25,640
Can Scheifele Ehlers and Conner just be on the same line together?

It wouldn't be the best defensively, but it would light opponents up.

Ehlers Scheifele Connor line has been good together. I am okay with that line as even if they are not defensively the best they don't bleed scoring chances against like the 81-55-13 line does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moon Man and hn777

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,047
28,469
Scheifele-Niederreiter is a combination that I would love to see. Not sure who the third wheel would be, but I'd be fairly sure about it working with most LWs.
Oh yeah don't disagree at all. I suggested the same combo in the off season. Ninos scoring over recent years was in the same tier as some of our top 6ers, while adding a solid physical presence and V good two way play overall.
 

Jet

Chibby!
Jul 20, 2004
34,148
35,464
Florida
Preds are tied for a wildcard spot. They're not going to be sellers.
Nino says hi lol.

I know it was a different scenario but I wonder if the preds would have made the playoffs if they didn't deal him to the Jets that year
 

Jet

Chibby!
Jul 20, 2004
34,148
35,464
Florida
See, this is why it's insane to use stats like these to draw conclusions

Based on the time you posted and assuming an average shift length of 45 seconds, they played 233 shifts together

10 times, something good happened, or 4.3% of their shifts

6 times, something bad happened, or 2.5% of their shifts

In ABSOLUTE TERMS, there was a 1.8% increase in good over bad

It's super common to see people use RELATIVE terms in order to try to overatate a small absolute affect. That would be a GF% or xGF or something like that. Even then, the differences are almost negligible

I once did the math on the difference between a 55% Corsi player and a 45% corsi player because:

1. That was the in fashion fancy stat of the day

And

2. Those numbers are on thr outer ends of the distribution and people felt comfortable saying a 55% CF player is superior to the 45%CF player...

Turns out the difference between the two is the 55%CF player is ON THE ICE (not even necessarily directly related to the shot attempt) for one more shot attempts for their team than the 45% player every nine shifts
The same people who HATE plus minus.

The same people who say faceoffs don't matter.

If you look at metrics and hockey stats nerds it becomes clear that most of them really aren't literate when it comes to statistical science.

When you take the fact that a lot of its based on bad or incomplete data, is further polluted by bias and ulterior motives (driving a narrative) and the people interpreting the stats are amateurs you can quickly see where the problems lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog

jetsfan15

Registered User
Jul 17, 2016
567
915
When Kyle Connor was injured, did he go on the LTIR list? If not, any reason why he wouldn’t have? (Asking why Jets wouldn’t take advantage of it for cap reasons, if they didn’t)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adam da bomb

BoneDocUK

Recovering hockey fandoc
Oct 1, 2015
6,956
14,881
When Kyle Connor was injured, did he go on the LTIR list? If not, any reason why he wouldn’t have? (Asking why Jets wouldn’t take advantage of it for cap reasons, if they didn’t)
IIRC it was IR and not LTIR.

I think for a shorter recovery timeline and without immediate cap pressure it made less sense to move him to LTIR at the time.



A useful explainer:

 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,133
31,217
When Kyle Connor was injured, did he go on the LTIR list? If not, any reason why he wouldn’t have? (Asking why Jets wouldn’t take advantage of it for cap reasons, if they didn’t)
we would have actually lost deadline capspace by putting him on ltir, going on ltir stops you from accruing cap space throughout the season and since we had enough capspace to call players up there was no reason to use ltir
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad