Rumor: All Purpose Trade Proposals, Speculation and Rumours - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,069
28,555
The D on a whole have been outstanding, last game against the Leafs we held the high powered 4 all star team to no goals in regulation time and that was without Joshua for 2+ periods.
Right. So idk how that poster says we have just Morrissey. It's f***ing stupid.
 

LowLefty

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 29, 2016
7,710
14,059
One consideration... If the Jets can't make a major move for now and future, make smart depth moves at the TDL and wait until the draft if it's clear that the Jets need any major upgrades. The value of a 1st or high 2nd round pick is at the highest at the draft, and there are likely more trade partners. Also, the Jets will have a better handle on their contract / cap situation going forward.
Agreed - and it might not necessarily be based on what he "can't" do but maybe more about what he feels he needs to do.
I still think he will be very careful with how he impacts this lineup and the safest approach might be tinkering to add some depth rather than going for the long bomb.
As you noted, he might wait to confirm if major changes are needed and to take advantage of draft value
 
  • Like
Reactions: ecolad and Buffdog

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,723
16,639
Starting to warm on monahan especially if we can get him for the cdns 2nd... he's scoring this year - would be a great finisher on our powerplay and with perfetti
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moon Man

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,160
31,410
Starting to warm on monahan especially if we can get him for the cdns 2nd... he's scoring this year - would be a great finisher on our powerplay and with perfetti
he's slow and bad defensively, he will see less pp time and overall toi here and we don't need another player who is often injured, he's also not a good fit for the system we play
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,711
43,439
Winnipeg
There’s always the possibility that Chevy could stand pat, he may really like some players but either the return might to great or he could get out bid or that player won’t waive to come here
I doubt he stands pat, but it is far from certain he takes a big swing. I've assumed all along his most likely path is something like last TDL. Good value moves that help the team now, but don't cost a lot. As it turned out Nino and Names last season ended up providing a tremendous amount of value for a 2nd and 4th pick. Maybe Chevy puts his first in play to reach a little higher but I don't see him letting any of his top prospects go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roccerfeller

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,509
5,735
Winnipeg
Larsson can pair up with JMo and is an excellent PKer just like Lindholm. He adds size to the back end at 6' 3" and 208 lbs. He has one more season after this one with a 4m caphit. If he isn't a bona fide 1RHD, he is an above average 2RHD.
Lindholm is 6' 1" and 195 lbs. Chevy loves size down the middle. He is 55.8% on the dot.
We add these two players and we become favorites for the cup.

The draft picks are far, far away from having any significant influence on the Jets. Helle and Scheif would be towards the ends of their contracts.

I checked and it says Larsson has a 10 team NMC?

Not saying it's impossible but that's a hurdle we don't have any visibility on

I doubt he stands pat, but it is far from certain he takes a big swing. I've assumed all along his most likely path is something like last TDL. Good value moves that help the team now, but don't cost a lot. As it turned out Nino and Names last season ended up providing a tremendous amount of value for a 2nd and 4th pick. Maybe Chevy puts his first in play to reach a little higher but I don't see him letting any of his top prospects go.

Yeah same here. If Chevy can get someone good in for a 1st + expendable prospect he will do that I think. But he definitely won't throw in guys like Lambert, Chibrikov or Heinola for a rental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingBogo

WolfHouse

Registered User
Oct 4, 2020
10,723
16,639
I am not opposed to Monahan, but not at the price of an early 2nd. has as many 5v5 goals as Mason Appleton and getting nearly 4 mins a night on the PP. he won't be seeing that PP usage here.
Why not? He would instantly be our best faceoff guy... like our powerplay needs a massive kick in the ass...

Kfc-monahan-scheif
Morrissey-ehlers
Seems fine to me...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moon Man

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,069
28,555
yeah it needs a kick to the ass of whoever is coaching it. insert monahan or not, i don't think it'll make a huge difference. the lack of movement and quickness or overall creativity is more of the issue i see.

just to reiterate - i don't mind monahan, but would not spend an early 2nd on him. he'll for sure bump the combo of kupari/toninato/gustafsson out of the line-up which will be an improvement.
Why not? He would instantly be our best faceoff guy... like our powerplay needs a massive kick in the ass...

Kfc-monahan-scheif
Morrissey-ehlers
Seems fine to me...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
31,259
24,604
Evanston, IL
Starting to warm on monahan especially if we can get him for the cdns 2nd... he's scoring this year - would be a great finisher on our powerplay and with perfetti
He can score on the PP, and he's not exactly crushing it there either. He's 4th in P/60 on the Canadiens on the PP.

He's bad 5v5. Think Kyle Connor playing without a stick.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,937
31,447
Lindholm at 50% for 2024 1st, Chishom of Stanley (their choice) and Kup.
Larsson for 2025 1st and Heinola.
A RHD corps of Larsson, DD, and Pionk with Scmidt as our 4RHD would be nice.

Might be your best ever trade proposal.

Not sure if either is accepted by the other team, but they might be. Not completely out of sight anyway.

Larsson has a 10 team no trade list. He would need to waive. No idea whether he would or not.

I wouldn't want Heinola to be the add to get Larsson. Add whichever Dman Calgary does not take for Lindholm instead and a 4th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moon Man

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,439
12,594
Might be your best ever trade proposal.

Not sure if either is accepted by the other team, but they might be. Not completely out of sight anyway.

Larsson has a 10 team no trade list. He would need to waive. No idea whether he would or not.

I wouldn't want Heinola to be the add to get Larsson. Add whichever Dman Calgary does not take for Lindholm instead and a 4th.
I must be slipping...
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,711
43,439
Winnipeg
But only to certain players. Look how quick they were to move Declan.
They haven't moved him, they have waived him. He is their 8th defenseman and 9th when Heinola comes back. We can argue if he is ahead of Stanley or not but most teams only run with 7 defenseman on their roster and seemed to be more worried that Stanley gets claimed over Chisholm which is probably true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffdog

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,142
10,133
They haven't moved him, they have waived him. He is their 8th defenseman and 9th when Heinola comes back. We can argue if he is ahead of Stanley or not but most teams only run with 7 defenseman on their roster and seemed to be more worried that Stanley gets claimed over Chisholm which is probably true.
Still don’t get loyalty to Lafallo and putting him on pp when he doesn’t produce.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,401
24,553
Why not? He would instantly be our best faceoff guy... like our powerplay needs a massive kick in the ass...

Kfc-monahan-scheif
Morrissey-ehlers
Seems fine to me...

I’ve said a few times I’m ok with Monahan as our plan B or plan C if he comes cheap enough.

1st+ like some Habs fan Expect - no, not a chance

1st - like many Habs want, no

2nd rd - not loving it, but could accept it if forced due to other failed trades

3rd rd - I’m perfectly happy giving up a 3rd for him
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad