It's easy to criticize the previous coaching regimes of stunting the kids' development. Coaching the offense out of them, etc. Considering that they were the consensus 1 and 2 picks, they were seen as offensive locks. The regimes assumed that the offense would naturally come, so if they worked on the kids' defensive sides of the puck, they'd result in complete players. It didn't work out that way, so it's easy to point fingers. I am not implying that they were not mishandled in many other respects but what if it did work out? It was never the intention to turn them into third line grinders. It's a joke that's enjoyable to toss around, but the reality is that the hockey gods f***ed us with defective goods.