With each day that passes, Kent Hughes will laugh even harder if Drury calls him up asking for their 1st for Lafreniere. I think Montreal would have done this last summer. But now?
Not their first but Panthers 1st I think they would do
With each day that passes, Kent Hughes will laugh even harder if Drury calls him up asking for their 1st for Lafreniere. I think Montreal would have done this last summer. But now?
No benefit to moving him now. They need to move a LW to open a top 6 spot for him. Kick him in the pool and say time to sink or swim.
I’d much rather do that than trade him for peanuts
So what is it about this organization in your opinion that keeps 1st/2nd overalls from developing?
The rangers buy talent... that doesn't work... they rebuild and draft 1st/2nd overal, 6th OA, etc.
What does work here? Starting to believe it's not hockey.
Not reallyThat seems next to impossible to do
It’s definitely more than hockey.So what is it about this organization in your opinion that keeps 1st/2nd overalls from developing?
The rangers buy talent... that doesn't work... they rebuild and draft 1st/2nd overal, 6th OA, etc.
What does work here? Starting to believe it's not hockey.
With each day that passes, Kent Hughes will laugh even harder if Drury calls him up asking for their 1st for Lafreniere. I think Montreal would have done this last summer. But now?
I dunno. Caufield was burnt to a crisp under "dino ass" Ducharme before Marty St. Louis resurrected him, Dach too in pedohawk land.It’s definitely more than hockey.
Or maybe just maybe , he’s just not that good? Fans in hockey always have this expectation that every top pick has to turn out to what their draft position expectations are. Players can be busts. I get it, sometimes it takes a bit longer for players to develop in the NHL, but in any other sport a player like this would be labeled a bust at this point. It’s time to stop making excuses and maybe come to the realization that Laf is just not going to live up to a 1st overall pick.theres no way he's this bad on his own.
Sorry, I have a hard time believing that when the consensus was neither draft year was a weak year.Or maybe just maybe , he’s just not that good? Fans in hockey always have this expectation that every top pick has to turn out to what their draft position expectations are. Players can be busts. I get it, sometimes it takes a bit longer for players to develop in the NHL, but in any other sport a player like this would be labeled a bust at this point. It’s time to stop making excuses and maybe come to the realization that Laf is just not going to live up to a 1st overall pick.
He should be playing 18 to 20 consistently with more pp timr or nothing changes.
Rangers forwards - even strength scoring leaders:Look, at the end of the day, Laf is the one with the puck on his stick. The coaches give him direction, but making plays is up to the player. Now, a coach can say, "Take is easy on the penalties" or "No turnovers on the blueline" but they are not going to go out there and tell a player how to intimately play their game. There's a system that all players adhere to, but they are free to create within that system as long as it doesn't repeatedly cost the team. And yes, vets have more leeway. Especially vets that can and have put points on the board. That's hockey and it's been that way then and now.
Points aside, Laf doesn't show any IQ with the puck. None. His battles are weak and the kid has zero speed. He doesn't look improved in any manner of speaking from the season prior. Even for young players that don't put a lot of points on the board, you have to show a certain no-how and tenacity to show you're worth the time over the next guy.
You and others here want Laf to consistently get more times and top PP time, while others like me want him to just consistently look like he belongs in the NHL. Not flashes of being decent for a game and then absolutely invisible the next several.
You can blame our coaching staff all you want (and I do understand that there might be development issues within the organization), but it's Laf playing those games and I'm certain if you put a kid his age who is blossoming in the NHL right now on the lines that Laf is playing, with the TOI he gets, they would look like the leaders on those lines. Standouts. Players that drive the play instead of it just being another pathetic shift. Those kinds of players don't need to be forced into the top lines needing to be surrounded by good players/vets in order to prop them up. They are the good players on those lines.
We'll see what he looks like next game. Looking at his stats, he goes 4-5 games without a point on average before putting something on the board.
The problem we’re having is we’re trying to assess how 20-21y old kids are developing during a season where 90% of the team, of all ages, positions and experience levels, are materially underperforming. Whatever systemic or team cultural issue exists that is dragging down $40mm worth of established veterans will easily do 2-3x the damage to less established players.Look, at the end of the day, Laf is the one with the puck on his stick. The coaches give him direction, but making plays is up to the player. Now, a coach can say, "Take is easy on the penalties" or "No turnovers on the blueline" but they are not going to go out there and tell a player how to intimately play their game. There's a system that all players adhere to, but they are free to create within that system as long as it doesn't repeatedly cost the team. And yes, vets have more leeway. Especially vets that can and have put points on the board. That's hockey and it's been that way then and now.
Points aside, Laf doesn't show any IQ with the puck. None. His battles are weak and the kid has zero speed. He doesn't look improved in any manner of speaking from the season prior. Even for young players that don't put a lot of points on the board, you have to show a certain no-how and tenacity to show you're worth the time over the next guy.
I wont be shocked if that happened already.The only way they move Lafreniere is if he asks to leave.
There's is way too much potential money being wasted for the Laffy camp not to be extremely upset with what's going on right now.I wont be shocked if that happened already.
There's is way too much potential money being wasted for the Laffy camp not to be extremely upset with what's going on right now.
points schmoints (no sarcasm)Rangers forwards - even strength scoring leaders:
Panarin 5-10-15
Zibanejad 4-10-14
Kreider 8-5-13
Chytil 4-7-11
Lafreniere 3-7-10
Goodrow 6-3-9
Kakko 4-4-8
Trocheck 3-4-7
Vesey 2-5-7
Gauthier 4-1-5
Blais 0-5-5
Carpenter 1-2-3
Kravtsov 1-1-2
Considering the kids have mostly played on inferior lines, I'd say they're outperforming the hell out of Vesey and Trocheck, yet both of those remain firmly entrenched in the top 6.
Why is it not registering here that the "vets" that everyone wants to start moving have NMC's?
Are people saying that Drury should begin to ask them to wave the no trade clause that was given to them?
And who can eat those contracts for high draft picks? Or are people here implying that a team is going to give up core players with similar contracts for the Rangers core players?
I’m committed to seeing it through. Can’t trade Lafreniere. Try to make it work. Again. Do something different. Get another coach. Implement another system.With each day that passes, Kent Hughes will laugh even harder if Drury calls him up asking for their 1st for Lafreniere. I think Montreal would have done this last summer. But now?
Or maybe just maybe , he’s just not that good? Fans in hockey always have this expectation that every top pick has to turn out to what their draft position expectations are. Players can be busts. I get it, sometimes it takes a bit longer for players to develop in the NHL, but in any other sport a player like this would be labeled a bust at this point. It’s time to stop making excuses and maybe come to the realization that Laf is just not going to live up to a 1st overall pick.
They have a "process" dang it! It's never worked, but they have it, and they're stickin' to it!If he was the only one this would be believable. But we are 0 for 5 with Laf, Kakko, Krav, Chytil, and Andersson.
Including multiple disputes with players (Anderson, Kravtsov) and another player who has insinuated to media that things are confusing here (Kakko).
It’s not just the player. The team has a problem.
I dunno. Caufield was burnt to a crisp under "dino ass" Ducharme before Marty St. Louis resurrected him, Dach too in pedohawk land.
St. Louis was smart enough not to get near NYR.So we need St Louis to come be our coach.
cOaChInG dOeSnT mAtTeRI dunno. Caufield was burnt to a crisp under "dino ass" Ducharme before Marty St. Louis resurrected him, Dach too in pedohawk land.