Junohockeyfan
Registered User
- Dec 16, 2018
- 15,088
- 12,823
I think Dach will be a better offensive player than Suzuki in 2 year’s time.
Didn't Tampa Bay have Stankos and Sergachev?There has never been a stanley cup champion team with core players aged more than 5 years apart.
Even *if* Chicago get Bedard, then what?They could have Hagel and Dach who are young enough to be part of a rebuild, and they could have Debrincat or at least have got more for him.
For the past 7 years straight, it has been the OPPOSITE.There has never been a stanley cup champion team with core players aged more than 5 years apart.
Exactly. Bedard and nothing else is a last place team. So then they have to find more Dachs, Hagels and Debrincats. LOL.Didn't Tampa Bay have Stankos and Sergachev?
Even *if* Chicago get Bedard, then what?
There has never been a stanley cup champion team with core players aged more than 5 years apart.
Sergachev isn't a core player. Stamkos, Kucherov, and Hedman are.Didn't Tampa Bay have Stankos and Sergachev?
Even *if* Chicago get Bedard, then what?
a central and often foundational part usually distinct from the enveloping part by a difference in natureFor the past 7 years straight, it has been the OPPOSITE.
Pittsburgh 2016 and 2017,
Malkin and Murray 8 years apartCrosby and Guentzel 8 years apart
Washington 2018,
Ovechkin and Kuznetsov 6 years apart
St. Louis 2019,
Bouwmeester and Parayko 9 years apartBouwmeester and O'Reilly 7 years apart
Tampa Bay 2020 and 2021,
McDonagh and Sergachev 9 years apartStamkos and Point 6 years apart
Colorado 2022,
Kadri and Makar 8 years apartLandeskog and Makar 6 years apartLandeskog and Byram 8 years apartSince this is a Habs forum, I will point out some examples from the past, just for extra content:
Beliveau and Dryden, 15 years apart
Maurice and Henri Richard, 15 years apart
Cournoyer and Shutt, 9 years apart
Lemaire and Gainey, 8 years apart
I know people can find a reason to dismiss the old Habs, but the last 7 years should be enough to disprove the statement that there has NEVER been a Cup champion with core players more than 5 years apart.
Perhaps if we could limit the core players to one per team, it would be sort of right.
A fully healthy McDavid brought his team to 2nd in his division in his second season.Exactly. Bedard and nothing else is a last place team. So then they have to find more Dachs, Hagels and Debrincats. LOL.
Easily ? I guess if you ignore the basic definition of words you can use the 9th best player on a team and say he is a "core" player.Why would you say something that's so easily disproven ? This isn't true of the team you cheer for. It's not even true for Chicago either.
Asset management was truly not their thing. A lot of good pieces were traded away and questionable moves were made post 2015.And Terevainen and Danault. Chicago has made some awful trades.
Colorado does not win without 87 point Kadri.Sergachev isn't a core player. Stamkos, Kucherov, and Hedman are.
At the very worst it stops at Point, but after three players I think youre stretching it.
Guentzle isn't a core player. Neither is f***ing Matt Murray lol.
Kuznetsov is a good one, Ovechkin isn't a good example. (Neither is Crosby by the way.) How often is a player
Bouwmeester and Parayko are not core players. Oreilly, Tarasenko and Pietrangelo were the core players... Guess what? Three years.
Makar, Rantanen, Mackinnon...
Richard wasn't a core player at that time. Beliveau stayed great for a long time and has arguably the 3rd greatest longevity of all-time.
Again, context matters.
A fully healthy Crosby brought his team to 2nd in the east in his second season.
The point of trading away Debrincat and Hagel and Dach was to get value too. They got Korchinski, Nazar, , Ludwinski, Raddysh (a top 9 player) and 2 other first round picks in 2023-2024.
I think they got shit value on Debrincat, to be fair, but I understand why they made the move.
Korchinski, Nazar, Raddysh and the added spots won to early trades of Dach, Hagel and Debrincat will all provide more value to the team in 2024-2025 than Dach, Hagel and Debrincat and a low top 10 pick/mid teens.
Well then, a core player argument is not relevant to Hagel or Dach nor even DeBrincat. None of them are Toews, Kane or Keith level players., and you only want to count 3.Easily ? I guess if you ignore the basic definition of words you can use the 9th best player on a team and say he is a "core" player.
The simple fact is that core players are of a certain age, its not a hard concept to grasp. Theres always outliers like Ovechkin and Beliveau, but do we really have to go through this ? Using the 1% (If that.) to prove a point.
McDavid in 2016-17 still had Eberle and Nugent-Hopkins as slightly older players to support him.A fully healthy McDavid brought his team to 2nd in his division in his second season.
A fully healthy Crosby brought his team to 2nd in the east in his second season.
The whole core player argument is irrelevant. You don't win without the right players surrounding the core. If you could Toronto, who has 4 core players, (5 when they had Kadri) would have multiple ups by now. Dach and DeBrincat are young enough to contribute for a several seasons after Chicago is relevant again.Well then, a core player argument is not relevant to Hagel or Dach nor even DeBrincat. None of them are Toews, Kane or Keith level players., and you only want to count 3.
@Mrb1p did't even consider Kadri core, despite the fact that Colorado won with him scoring 87 in 71, and never won before despite having their supposed full core. They also really miss Kadri this year while being a bubble team (yes, there are injuries, but his presence would have made up for some of that, no?).The whole core player argument is irrelevant. You don't win without the right players surrounding the core. If you could Toronto, who has 4 core players, (5 when they had Kadri) would have multiple ups by now. Dach and DeBrincat are young enough to contribute for a several seasons after Chicago is relevant again.
@Mrb1p did't even consider Kadri core, despite the fact that Colorado won with him scoring 87 in 71, and never won before despite having their supposed full core. They also really miss Kadri this year while being a bubble team (yes, there are injuries, but his presence would have made up for some of that, no?).
He's still their 2nd best dman.Sergachev isn't a core player. Stamkos, Kucherov, and Hedman are.
2011 Boston,Hall of famer Hossa probably wasn't core according to bright bulb. Sharp and Hossa were probably the 9th best guys. Keith too. Heck, add in Zetterberg, best PO scoring forward Getzlaf, Brindamour, Justin Williams... and Chara. Basically mrb1p slewing mrb1p nonsense as per usual. Taking what's quite literally common place and calling it an outlier.
Dach isn’t a Lou type player like Horvat, and Romanov is a prototypical Lamariello DmanI have no clue why the Isles didn't make the trade for Dach themselves. Romanov is a meh player. HuGo need to make another type of trade for a RHD because I'm not too sold on Mailloux/Barron for the future.
Well then, a core player argument is not relevant to Hagel or Dach nor even DeBrincat. None of them are Toews, Kane or Keith level players., and you only want to count 3.
The whole core player argument is irrelevant. You don't win without the right players surrounding the core. If you could Toronto, who has 4 core players, (5 when they had Kadri) would have multiple ups by now. Dach and DeBrincat are young enough to contribute for a several seasons after Chicago is relevant again.
@Mrb1p did't even consider Kadri core, despite the fact that Colorado won with him scoring 87 in 71, and never won before despite having their supposed full core. They also really miss Kadri this year while being a bubble team (yes, there are injuries, but his presence would have made up for some of that, no?).
How gracious of you to insult me because I used the example of Maurice Richard being 9th in scoring on the team during his last cup win.You're being a dimwit with that 9th player hyperbole and even moreso with that 1% nonsense. Just taking the post 05 lockout cup teams this is outrageously false, starting with the first cup winner.
All those guys are elite players. Debrincat and Dach are not. Well, except for Sharp and Williams who are not core. Believe it or not, the Hawks didn't trade away 24 years old Getzlaf, Brindamour, Zetterberg, Keith, Chara, or Hossa. They traded away a 5'6 top 6 forward who that is currently 83rd overall in scoring.Hall of famer Hossa probably wasn't core according to bright bulb. Sharp and Hossa were probably the 9th best guys. Keith too. Heck, add in Zetterberg, best PO scoring forward Getzlaf, Brindamour, Justin Williams... and Chara. Basically mrb1p slewing mrb1p nonsense as per usual. Taking what's quite literally common place and calling it an outlier.
During the cup runs ? I believe McDonagh was, or even Cernak, but even so, it is beside the point, a 2nd best D isn't a core player unless you have a Pronger/Niedermeyer kind of set up to your roster. Sergachev isn't a defining aspect of the Tampa rosters.He's still their 2nd best dman.
Boston is a good one. Thomas and Chara with Bergeron and Krejci.2011 Boston,
Thomas 11 years older than BergeronThomas 12 years older than KrejciChara 8 years older than BergeronChara 9 years older than Krejci
2012 and 2014 Los Angeles,
Williams 8 years older than DoughtyGaborik 8 years older than Doughty (2014 only)
2010 and 2013 and 2015 Chicago,
Hossa 10 years older than KaneHossa 9 years older than ToewsKeith 6 years older than KaneHossa had his number retired by Chicago. He was CORE!!
So now we are at 13 years in a row disproving the original statement.
There has never been a stanley cup champion team with core players aged more than 5 years apart.
He needs to shoot more. But Dach is a more dynamic playmaker.I think Dach will be a better offensive player than Suzuki in 2 year’s time.
He does shoot more already than at the start of the year, that’s good.He needs to shoot more. But Dach is a more dynamic playmaker.
I have no clue why the Isles didn't make the trade for Dach themselves. Romanov is a meh player. HuGo need to make another type of trade for a RHD because I'm not too sold on Mailloux/Barron for the future.
I think that's probably the issue then. Lou...... it's just not the early aughts anymore. This style of play seems to only limit how far the team can go, especially without better wingers. Yea you need a guy like Romanov either way, no doubt. But then you usually don't need to give up what they did to get one. Which I guess is the real issue, how Lou prioritizes pieces in 2023.Dach isn’t a Lou type player like Horvat, and Romanov is a prototypical Lamariello Dman