Gil Gunderson
Registered User
It was great seeing him on the left side…with one minute left in the game.
He had been looking better over the last few games in his spot. We were only up 1 and he changed their positions but then at the end of the game, we needed a goal and he put cat right where he brings, back on the left. Just dumb logic to try it for 2 min in a one goal game.That was weird, but don't mind them trying something else when the puck hasn't been going in for him.
I want to see him with Stützle. Pinto can play with Tkachuk and Batherson, it makes the match-ups a little more even especially on the road where we can’t seem to win.
Sanderson will take the dead cap money next year and Pinto will have to be bridged for cap purposes. Removing DeBrincat doesn’t make us better, it begins to create holes at wing especially considering Giroux’s age and Formenton’s situation. This team needs to be adding, not subtracting.The Sens are going to be in a tough spot with Cat in my opinion. He's an excellent player and has shown it the past few years and absolutely deserves to get paid. I just don't think the Sens can/should be the team to pay 8/9M+ for an undersized winger.
Pinto, Sanderson & Zub all need significant raises. We also clearly need substantial improvements made to our d-core as a whole.
There is just no way 8-9M of our remaining cap is best used on a winger (albeit a very good one) when we have such glaring holes on positions that are way more important then a winger.
I didn’t mind the Norris switch and the lines were rolling in all fairness. But I think the Brassard experiment at 2C was a waste of time, he’s at the tail end of his career and was never going to be able to handle Norris’ spot. And long-term this team is better off if Stützle and DeBrincat build some great chemistry, we already know Norris, Tkachuk and Batherson work well together. I don’t particularly understand what DJ is waiting for there. Give them at least 10 games together and see what happens.Of course it should be this :
Tkachuk - Pinto - Batherson
DeBrincat - Stutzle - Giroux
Like Norris should have been in Pinto's place at first. When you try to force a square peg into a round hole too much, bad things happen (like Norris injury for example)
I have been trying to figure out what this management (for 6 years now) and this coaching staff (for 4 years now) is doing, I still have no idea
Sanderson will take the dead cap money next year and Pinto will have to be bridged for cap purposes. Removing DeBrincat doesn’t make us better, it begins to create holes at wing especially considering Giroux’s age and Formenton’s situation. This team needs to be adding, not subtracting.
Our defence needs one more top four guy and Sanderson to be an elite number one. Not much we can do at this stage but wait for Sanderson to develop and try to make a trade/sign a UFA OR hope a prospect develops into one. But either way trading DeBrincat creates another hole rather than solving anything imo.
The Sens are going to be in a tough spot with Cat in my opinion. He's an excellent player and has shown it the past few years and absolutely deserves to get paid. I just don't think the Sens can/should be the team to pay 8/9M+ for an undersized winger.
Pinto, Sanderson & Zub all need significant raises. We also clearly need substantial improvements made to our d-core as a whole.
There is just no way 8-9M of our remaining cap is best used on a winger (albeit a very good one) when we have such glaring holes on positions that are way more important then a winger.
Subbing in Formenton for DeBrincat this summer and allocating the extra money to re-sign Zub (overpaying if necessary) and adding a competent RD is a much better idea than throwing the bag at DeBrincat to be our 2nd line LW and 2nd PP shooter.
I agree that the Sens shouldn't be doing subtracting. That's a given. i just think the money should be allocated heavily towards defence as opposed to the top-6. When Norris went don't, on paper, the Sens seemed much better prepared to fill the position from within.
When Zub went down so did everything else. This team is incredibly fragile on defence even when we're at full health. When even one guy goes out this whole team doesn't have a chance.
IMO, its far easier to fill a hole at wing then it is on defence.
Sure perhaps we can figure out contracts for Sandy and Pinto but that still leaves Zub and an addition top-4 guy. The most obvious place for this money comes from not signing DeBrincat.
And this isn't to say that Cat isn't worth a massive pay day because I believe he is, but I just don't think we're the team to do it given the state of our defence and our other upcoming contracts.
The next issue comes when you realize just how weak the top-4 dman market is, which then begs the question, should we have kept our 7th and inevitably drafted one of the higher ranked remaining defenders. I'm sure the answer to that will be a resounding no, but at this point, it seems rather bleak on finding a way to add a top-4 dman any time soon.
He had goalless droughts playing with Kane too. The goals will come with his shooting percentage (just like Matthews) but things like keeping him on the bench with a minute left in the game aren't doing him any favours.Without Kane he can't score.
My issue isn't his offense, it is the way he plays without the puck and also the fact that he has gotten picked quite a few times by opposing teams recently. He needs to improve on his back check and also the way he does business in the offensive zone. He has been coasting a lot recently, with not much jam to his game. When i saw him in the pre season I guess I expected a small player that is built like a brick and plays tough. Lately what I'm seeing is a player who looks timid. I want this guy to succeed, but I am not going to hold back criticism.Way too early to pass judgement on him.
He's shooting 5%, but he still has 8pts in 9GP. If that's what cold DeBrincat looks like, I can't wait to see hot DeBrincat.