Nac Mac Feegle
wee & free
- Jun 10, 2011
- 35,704
- 10,219
He's not an UFA at the end of the season.
Assen na yo!
d'oh, you're right. Still RFA.
He's not an UFA at the end of the season.
Assen na yo!
the vibes?I'm still trying to figure out how this all works out. What I mean is, if he plays this year, he's a UFA at the end of the season and can get one of those crazy UFA deals in the summer. Why on earth would he want to sign now? What advantage is it for him to sign now (aside from the obvious major injury or the roadrunner dropping an anvil on his head or something)?
RFA but stillI'm still trying to figure out how this all works out. What I mean is, if he plays this year, he's a UFA at the end of the season and can get one of those crazy UFA deals in the summer. Why on earth would he want to sign now? What advantage is it for him to sign now (aside from the obvious major injury or the roadrunner dropping an anvil on his head or something)?
He’s not UFAI'm still trying to figure out how this all works out. What I mean is, if he plays this year, he's a UFA at the end of the season and can get one of those crazy UFA deals in the summer. Why on earth would he want to sign now? What advantage is it for him to sign now (aside from the obvious major injury or the roadrunner dropping an anvil on his head or something)?
Perhaps a young one from Buffalo.If we can't sign him, please lets get a bonafide top 4 RD for him.
Even with the fact that there's 2 strong lines and 2 distinct PP units, Debrincat is still likely to score the most goals in this team and crack 40 this year. Chicago had one line to check last year and DeBrincat is not a product of Patrick Kane.the vibes?
but seriously since we are a two line/two pp team instead of the one line/one pp team that he was on in chicago he may not be able to get as much ice time/pp time to get another 40 goal season or keep a 40 goal pace over the next two years
if he has two 30-35 goal years (which is still very good) will end up costing himself some money. It makes some sense to capitalize early if security is what he is after
in a way its like how most sens fans are norris' goal pace to go down
We’re not trading Norris away to sign DBC.Debrincat is awesome. I don't mind trading away Norris in order to resign him
Pinto could easily step up and play between Cat and Giroux or even Tkachuk and Bath
Norris is just too north and south player for my liking. His 5on5 impact is minimal when it comes to creating offense
Honestly. That would destroy the locker roomWe’re not trading Norris away to sign DBC.
This is definitely not the AnswerDebrincat is awesome. I don't mind trading away Norris in order to resign him
Pinto could easily step up and play between Cat and Giroux or even Tkachuk and Bath
Norris is just too north and south player for my liking. His 5on5 impact is minimal when it comes to creating offense
As much as I’d like to get ADB under 9, not sure it’s realistic, Lamoriello just signed Barzal at 9.15 x 8.Some people seem to think that Debrincat's qualifying offer is a floor for an entire max contract.
Yes, Debrincat can get 9 mil for next year by accepting QO. But that's not a guarantee he gets 9 mil in 9 years when he's 34.
Based on the contracts received by huberdeau gaudreau Kadri and Miller this year, I think it behooves debrincat to either take a max contract or one that ends before he's 30.
If his goal is security 8 years x 8.75. If his goal is to maximize earnings 3 years x 9.2
From the senators perspective they maintain flexibility while locking in debrincat's top earning years.
From debrincat perspective he pprobably leaves a little on table through prime but gets another contract that takes advantage of higher cap and gets higher earnings through his mid to late 30's.
That next contract will probably also have signing bonuses that ottawa won't provide. So a 9.2 x3 is probably more like 40 million in 3 years plus a day.
Barzal is center so arguably can command more.As much as I’d like to get ADB under 9, not sure it’s realistic, Lamoriello just signed Barzal at 9.15 x 8.
Debrincat is awesome. I don't mind trading away Norris in order to resign him
Pinto could easily step up and play between Cat and Giroux or even Tkachuk and Bath
Norris is just too north and south player for my liking. His 5on5 impact is minimal when it comes to creating offense
Knight isn't gonna move. I'd sooner target dostal or tarasov ++.If we do have to trade him, we should target a goalie like Spencer Knight. Hypothetically, let's say he's willing to extend in Miami, we trade him for Knight and have our goalie of the future. I like Mads, but not convinced he'll be a star like Knight will/may be.
3-4 year deal does the first, while allowing you to set up for the latter. The 8M lost from not signing 8 years now is then recouped with inflation/increase salary cap.
8.5 X 4 = 34
10 x 8 = 80
Total = 114M
9.5M x 8 = 76M
7M x 6 = 42M
Total = 118M
With the latter assuming/gambling he's able to land a still significant contract at 32 y.o. Option 1 secures his 30M right away, gives his new family some stability with new baby. Option 2 basically all but guarantees he's on the move again next year.
I'd trade Norris long before I'd trade Batherson.I think the Norris contract ages really well, he's a smart and efficient player and locked up until the end of the decade. I'd rather see Batherson traded, as crazy as it sounds. The value could be insane, might be able to get players for him we simply wouldn't for Norris.
All depends on the cap going up of course and being able to keep ADB+Zub first, but that that point it might make sense as an option for acquiring a D or G.