I agree - if we are in the playoffs and he won't sign is where it gets a bit diceyHere’s my take on Debrincat
We can easily get a 1st for him at next years deadline or a solid prospect. To me there is no sense in trading him for a crap return just to unload him
If the offers aren’t there, we should qualify him, use him next year to help us win. Heck maybe he changes his tune and decides to sign long term
If we aren’t in the playoffs and he won’t sign then we deal him at the deadline for a first and move on
Selling him low now makes zero sense . It doesn’t help us now or in the future
Hard to find a fit given that they only have about 7M in cap space and need 4 or 5 forwards to fill out their roster. I guess if they buyout Suter as has been speculated it would open up some more space.Garrioch said on Onrait tonight to watch for Detroit and Dallas in particular on Debrincat.
What would interest us from Dallas?
If Detroit is/was making offers for DeBrincat, and we opt to trade him somewhere else because we're worried Debrincat will help them win games, Detroit will just move on to the next trade target. It's not like the only way they can improve is with DeBrincat.The package has to be substantially better imo. You don't like the player, but he's a consistent goal scorer in the league and would help Detroit win games. It could quite easily cost the Sens a playoff spot.
Sens lose their chance at the UFA market when the caps been flat for 3 years and all the desirable destinations have no cap space. Keeping a player around that does not want to be here doesn't make sense. Everyone needs to be pulling on the rope the same way. Sends a terrible message to the room. Teams that play for one another have the most success in this league. Individuals don't win in this sport. Need to bring in players that want to be here. There is no circumstance they can lose him for nothing with the lack of picks and prospects this team has. They're trying to win a cup sometimes you have to think bigger picture. Building a culture of winning isn't going to happen by gifting players ice time and opportunity if they aren't committed to what this organization is trying to achieve.This is exactly what we should do.
The market reverses around the trade deadline and selling players goes for a premium.
Wyatt Johnston and picks.Garrioch said on Onrait tonight to watch for Detroit and Dallas in particular on Debrincat.
What would interest us from Dallas?
sadly, the trade and subsequent signing is a poor reflection on LOU and not praise for the Canucks.This.
An unsigned pending UFA Bo Horvat was just traded in January for Anthony Beauvillier, Aatu Raty and a 1st round pick.
Ottawa shouldn't be settling for much less than that.
If I recall everyone was pretty excited about the acquisition of DeBrincat, fans were calling it the summer of Pierre if I recall correctly. So now fans are not happy with Pierre is funny!The Cat and Dorion come in at #3
Would moving a cost controlled ($894k/yr) Johnston be a smart/logical move for Dallas? They have $7.3 m of cap space and have to sign six players.Wyatt Johnston and picks.
fans are free to be excited. I was not one.. I am not gloating.. I have been wrong enough times. So being right on one, does not give me gloating privileges.If I recall everyone was pretty excited about the acquisition of DeBrincat, fans were calling it the summer of Pierre if I recall correctly. So now fans are not happy with Pierre is funny!
I made a comment when the trade went down about the term (1 year). A few came back with comments on the QO year. I wasn't particularly pacified with that response (a QO is not a sure thing), but didn't make too much noise about it. There was definitely some excitement about the trade.If I recall everyone was pretty excited about the acquisition of DeBrincat, fans were calling it the summer of Pierre if I recall correctly. So now fans are not happy with Pierre is funny!
Here are the possibilities if we qualify and keep him:
- we're out of the playoffs by the trade deadline, we trade him then and recoup a fraction of the value we gave up for him;
- we're in the playoff hunt but we still trade him anyway to get some value (would be very hard for fans to understand this move, and very unlikely to happen) but now we risk missing the playoffs as a result;
- we're in the playoff hunt but we keep him: either we still miss the playoffs (that's the worst case scenario) or we make it (best case scenario, gets better with each playoff round win), but either way we lose him for nothing at the end of the season.
I think I'd rather trade him now and get some asset back that can help us this year and at least one more year after that, and use the freed up money to do other things.
Either way it's not pretty...
They're in a contention window now and would be adding a piece in the same age range as their new core nucleus of Hintz, Robertson, Heiskanen and Oettinger. Also, why are you going off Debrincat's goal total from last year instead of looking at the larger body of work of one of the best young goal scorers in the league? And why mention goals without mentioning Johnston's 41P vs. Debrincat's 66P (which are widely believed to be a down year for him). I get you wanna make your point but you don't need to present highly selective numbers to do it.Would moving a cost controlled ($894k/yr) Johnston be a smart/logical move for Dallas? They have $7.3 m of cap space and have to sign six players.
Johnston had 24 goals last year versus Debrincat's 26. Found that interesting.
My only point was that Dallas don't have the cap to make a trade for Debrincat, unless they dump more players.They're in a contention window now and would be adding a piece in the same age range as their new core nucleus of Hintz, Robertson, Heiskanen and Oettinger. Also, why are you going off Debrincat's goal total from last year instead of looking at the larger body of work of one of the best young goal scorers in the league? And why mention goals without mentioning Johnston's 41P vs. Debrincat's 66P (which are widely believed to be a down year for him). I get you wanna make your point but you don't need to present highly selective numbers to do it.
Relatively interesting2024 1st, Bourque, and Marchment (probably on the NTC list)?
Then trade that 1st to upgrade the roster.
2024 1st, Bourque, and Marchment (probably on the NTC list)?
Then trade that 1st to upgrade the roster.
It’s protected.Is the 2024 Boston 1st Detroit has protected? Not discounting the Bruins yet, but it wouldn't be shocking if they miss the playoffs next year with their cap issues and Bergeron/Krejci not returning.