Like I said, at the time it was considered an overpay. I don’t see why that’s the standard.
And I said nothing about retention.
I get why you think Miller is worth way more than the Coleman package, I just don’t think he’ll get it. What team is going to give up that much?
Plus Barron is a better prospect than Foote
So at the time if it was considered an overpay and in hindsight it looks like a good trade doesn't that mean the original opinion was wrong?
Also Barron is not much of a better prospect than Foote. Foote was the 27th overall pick, Barron was the 25th overall pick. In a re-draft of both's prospective drafts they both probably go in the same draft spots. For any difference between Foote and Barron, you could say the same between getting an unprotected 1st from Vancouver vs Colorado 1st.
Canucks were free falling and projected to miss the playoffs when Tampa made that trade. Thanks to covid and the play-in, Canucks managed to make the playoffs. New Jersey was looking at a potential lottery pick + Foote. At worst they knew they were getting a top 20 pick.
20th overall pick + Foote = Projected late 1st + Barron