I dont agree with your logic. First The Avs don't need offense they need a goalie. 2nd to say they have all these other players does not diminish a prospects value. He is what he is and his value is his value. You dont sell a player for less because you have depth. 3rd cherry picking past trades that were over pays does not dictate their value. Mark stone was traded for much less Taylor hall last year. Sam Reinhart this year. I could probably name some more if I actually put thought into it.
In all seriousness, I will admit the price is going down from thread to thread. The Rangers thread had a price of 4 1st round picks and now its Barron and 2 firsts? I think that's fairly close. I personally feel its a 1st, prospect and another smaller piece player/2nd round pick etc.
I never diminished Podkolzin or Barron's value because of the depth though? You asked me if the Canucks were a contender, shoe was on the other foot, would I trade Podz + 2 1sts for Larkin at 50%. I mentioned well if the Canucks had the young winger depth to cover for his loss (like the Avs do on D for Barron), and the Canucks were serious contenders and would be seen as favourites, I would offer a 3 1st value because I would rather be the overwhelming favourites for 2 years to win the cup (worked for TBL in year 2) than have 3 1sts value. Although 3 1st value in my eyes would be max Pod + 1st + 2nd.
I didnt cherry pick anything, pending UFA always cost less because you're getting them for 10-20 reg season games and a playoff run.
Mark Stone was a pending UFA and it was clear Ottawa wasn't re-signing him. He returned a top prospect (brannstrom) + 2nd + a 4th liner. Come next TDL if its clear we aren't re-signing Miller, I'd be happy with that kind of return for him.
Taylor Hall again another pending UFA clearly leaving his current team. Returned a 2nd + a young 4th liner with 3rd line upside. Essentially a 2nd + 3rd round pick value.
So given these examples, how is expecting a 1st + 3rd value for Miller next TDL overpriced? Thats less than Stone got since Brannstrom was highly regarded and worth more than a late 1st. Its more than Hall got because Miller plays all 3 positions, and is better at both ends of the ice.
The only difference on price now vs a month ago is the Canuck fans that have been reasonable all along (I like to think myself included) have come to the acceptance that we arent getting a top prospect like Schneider/Newhook/Podkolzin/Brannstrom along with the late 1st. Instead we are getting a Barron or Lundqvist + a late 1st and then a 2nd round pick value in a roster player to take salary back. When we retain 50% we expect that to increase that 2nd round pick value to a 1st round pick value.