BritishSen
Registered User
- May 20, 2018
- 32
- 49
This was the geezer I wanted, looks very bright and seems a bit of a nutter, the best combination.
Ha. The absolute dumbest thing you could do.Just awful. Should have given the pick up.
Agreed. It would the dumbest move to makeHa. The absolute dumbest thing you could do.
I beg to differ. You win games with leaders like Tkachuk. Exactly what this team needed. Only other players I would have selected at 4 outside of who was already taken would have been Bouchard, Hughes and Dobson for defensive help. There is a reason zadina fell.Will not be in top 10 players in 2028 re-draft.
Not even close to best player available, but certainly a low ceiling/high floor pick who will contribute as a complementary player.
What?? Teaching skill at this stage in a player’s career? I think they should label this type of thinking the “Lazar delusion”.It's a lot harder to teach character than skill. Tkachuk over Zadina has a good chance of being Bowers over Tolvanen 2.0.
Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that the right pick was made. I'm just saying that the Sens weren't the only team to pass on him. Maybe scouts saw something in Zadina at the combine they didn't like. Maybe both the Yotes GM and ours just f***ed up big time. I don't know, and only time will tell if either of these options or some other possibility is correct. I just know that if Zadina turns into a 50 goal scorer, the Sens weren't the ONLY team who missed out on those 50 goals.That’s what we said about Kopitar too.
The best analaogy I can make off the top of my head is the Bruins taking Jake DeBrusk over Mat Barzal. Is DeBrusk a good player with an impressive power forward skill set and intangibles? Yes. Would I like him on my team? Yes. Would I rather have him than Barzal? No, I'll take Barzal and his offensive upside over DeBrusk.
I'm not freaking out about the pick. I like Tkachuk as a player. I just like Zadina better. I think Ottawa has a desperate need for high end skill and scoring especially with Hoffman gone. They also have a handful of good
character guys already with Duchene, Pageau, Stone, Smith, Paajarvi, Pyatt, and even a veteran like Burrows who is allegedly good in the room. Zadina has a higher ceiling and fits the profile of a scorer better while also being solid in the two way game. That doesn't mean I think Tkachuk is an awful pick or a bust in the making. I just preferred Zadina.
Power forwards are hard to acquire - they always have been - and we thought we were getting one of the better ones with Bobby Ryan years ago. But they're also being phased out of the NHL as the league becomes more centered around speed/skill/skating. Lots of these power forward types start declining/depreciating as they approach 30. Guys like Lucic, Bobby Ryan, and Perry have become a cap burden for their teams and do not impact the game like they did 5 years ago. Guys like Toews and Kesler have slowed considerably. Mike Richards burned out rather quickly as he approached 30. Wayne Simmonds is not nearly as effective as he once was. Teams built on power forward types who play heavy hockey like the Ducks and Kings were swept in the first round by teams with more speed and skill.
I also think it's easier to add character through free agency/other avenues than scoring. You can find a guy like Paajarvi or Thompson or Pyatt to come in and add character and leadership to a room. Same on defense. The cost of adding skill/scoring is much greater in terms of cost, whether that's dollars in free agency or assets in a trade.
White-Brown-Tkachuk line. Offense with lots of energy, they can be the Americano Line
White-Brown-Tkachuk line. Offense with lots of energy, they can be the Americano Line
My word if Ryan can somehow stay injury free it could have potentialStoked to see Tkachuk Stone combo. Mix in some Brown and oh baby
My word if Ryan can somehow stay injury free it could have potential
Tkachuk and Duchene together is gonna be money both are strong around the boards
Meh falling in love with certain players, and then crapping all over your team when they dont take the one you like....Seems childish,nobody here is a scout or has put the hours in looking all over the world looking for these players...Yes we have had a ****ty year,but we also have proven we can draft too,so ill trust the professionals rather than the upset kids on this board....Welcome to Ottawa Tkachuk
Meh falling in love with certain players, and then crapping all over your team when they dont take the one you like....Seems childish,nobody here is a scout or has put the hours in looking all over the world looking for these players...Yes we have had a ****ty year,but we also have proven we can draft too,so ill trust the professionals rather than the upset kids on this board....Welcome to Ottawa Tkachuk
I wanted a player ,yes we all said Zadina ,Dobson etc etc...But in the end we drafted who the men we pay to look at these kids from every angle wanted,and that should be good enough given their decent draft record shouldnt it??Please.
90% of voters on this board elected to take Zadina if he fell.
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/thre...-they-take-him.2499001/page-17#post-146795449
It’s just as childish to pretend that this is the guy we all wanted all along.
I want Tkachuk to succeed but I’m going to rant a little bit the day after the draft.
Yeah poor wording,lets not pull the long knives out and carve up the kid before he plays a game for us ,is more on the lines in which I was going ...We are all better than thatEh nobody here is an NHL coach or player (other than burner accounts) but we still criticized the team's performance last year. It's kind of what these forums are for haha. And yes, it probably is childish.
I beg to differ. You win games with leaders like Tkachuk. Exactly what this team needed. Only other players I would have selected at 4 outside of who was already taken would have been Bouchard, Hughes and Dobson for defensive help. There is a reason zadina fell.