Toggle sidebar

Boston Bruins 24-25 Roster/Cap thread VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dr Quincy

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,392
11,754
Dr Hook said:
If they want to play Beech and he's paper up and down, someone else gets moved down on paper so the roster is cap compliant, right? So someone is getting exposed to waivers based on this roster if that happens?



You see glimpses of it with him, which makes you think it's in there to be tapped into. Maybe it's the blind squirrel finding the occasional nut, though. I also think there might have been more earlier if he had been able to stay healthy (but then Anaheim would probably have re-signed him).
Click to expand...
He's 26 years old. He is what he is. If there was any potential it would've been tapped by now.

Dr Hook said:
I need some clarity on this, as I've understood it as you say in Bussi's case. However, we just saw Patera get waived and reclaimed by Vancouver. Clearly Boston did not have to keep him on the roster all season long.
Click to expand...
You are allowed to waive a player you claimed. You can't trade him (simple version). The "You have to keep him up..." just means that you "have to keep him up" unless you want to risk losing him to waivers.

But not at all surprised Bussi cleared. What team is going to play him 25 games this year?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The don godfather
GordonHowe

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,434
18,973
Newton, MA.
Last edited:
Dr Hook

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,629
22,143
Tyler, TX
Dr Quincy said:
You are allowed to waive a player you claimed. You can't trade him (simple version). The "You have to keep him up..." just means that you "have to keep him up" unless you want to risk losing him to waivers.
Click to expand...
Thanks for that, so that's just regular waivers then. For some reason I had the impression that there was some different rule about waivers prior to season start. As for Jones, I guess we'll see. I hope you are wrong, and I have a slim belief that his offensive problems stem in large part from injury and usage and he can find another level to that part of his game here. I don't look for him to turn into a 20-25 goal guy, but a third liner that can do 15 or so? I think it's possible. It would be really helpful if that happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PatriceBergeronFan
Gee Wally

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
76,587
98,749
HF retirement home
PlayMakers said:
Why carry 22? Maybe for practice purposes? Seems like their hopes of adding at the deadline are a pipe dream with $600k of deadline space.
Click to expand...


Still early.
Im guessing once Poitras comes off IR they play the paper transaction game of sent to Providence on game days. Then if he’s A-OK waive Tufte.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayMakers

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
12,716
7,248
Visit site
PlayMakers said:
Why carry 22? Maybe for practice purposes? Seems like their hopes of adding at the deadline are a pipe dream with $600k of deadline space.
Click to expand...

Well they probably won't always carry 22, but I guess we will see. I assume there will be some paper transactions during the year , especially when they are in the middle of homestands or have long breaks in between games.

But yeah they are not likely to get to a big number at the deadline. Maybe they can get closer to 1.5 million playing cap games, but then again that would likely get offset by injuries along the way
 
Gee Wally

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
76,587
98,749
HF retirement home

dugg133

Registered User
Jan 11, 2023
1,623
4,066
PlayMakers said:
Why carry 22? Maybe for practice purposes? Seems like their hopes of adding at the deadline are a pipe dream with $600k of deadline space.
Click to expand...
If Poitras is just on normal IR like that says then we don't get any cap relief from him being there I think, so whenever he's good to go you just activate him and there's your 23 man roster.
 
PlayMakers

PlayMakers

Registered User
Aug 9, 2004
26,023
28,327
Medfield, MA
dugg133 said:
If Poitras is just on normal IR like that says then we don't get any cap relief from him being there I think, so whenever he's good to go you just activate him and there's your 23 man roster.
Click to expand...
That's even worse. I want them to carry 21. Providence is a 45 minute ride away. Bank, bank, bank.
 
DiggityDog

DiggityDog

2 Minutes for Ruffing
Nov 2, 2019
2,768
6,051
Kegs said:
You don’t get to choose your nickname. :p



You are clearly very high on bussi.
Click to expand...
I can’t speak for him, but it isn’t off base to suggest that Korpisalo was acquired as a bit of a reclamation project. Obviously the deal with Ottawa required salary coming back, but if he can help them now as a back up and if he performs well you peddle him for an asset.

I doubt the Bruins want to hold on to a $3 million back up for the next 3 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff, PlayMakers and Kegs
LouJersey

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,495
46,028
At the Cross
youtu.be
Looking at the overall construction it seems pretty flawed. Not saying it's not going to work, but just a few thoughts...

The forwards are super thin, especially since none of the kids stepped up and Matty P hurt.

The defense seems to be pretty expensive. 30 mil or so. All of the value of having an ELC deal on the 2nd pair is negated by almost 8 million on the 3rd pair.

Goalie wise, it's seems insane to have a 3 mil dollar backup to a guy you just gave 8+ million too but maybe they really thought they could get him under 7. Just odd

Would a guy like Arvidsson at 2 rw and Wotherspoon at 3LD be better than Geekie at 2RW and Z at 3LD?

I'm sure it will all work out as the season goes on, but it really doesn't seem like this was the finished product game one they imagined?

Dennis Bonvie said:
Does anyone do that?
Click to expand...
Looks like 8 teams at this point.

DiggityDog said:
I can’t speak for him, but it isn’t off base to suggest that Korpisalo was acquired as a bit of a reclamation project. Obviously the deal with Ottawa required salary coming back, but if he can help them now as a back up and if he performs well you peddle him for an asset.

I doubt the Bruins want to hold on to a $3 million back up for the next 3 years.
Click to expand...
There is zero chance the Bruins brought his name up in talks as someone they were interested in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and Horton Hears A Woo
Dennis Bonvie

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
31,483
21,092
Connecticut
LouJersey said:
Looking at the overall construction it seems pretty flawed. Not saying it's not going to work, but just a few thoughts...

The forwards are super thin, especially since none of the kids stepped up and Matty P hurt.

The defense seems to be pretty expensive. 30 mil or so. All of the value of having an ELC deal on the 2nd pair is negated by almost 8 million on the 3rd pair.

Goalie wise, it's seems insane to have a 3 mil dollar backup to a guy you just gave 8+ million too but maybe they really thought they could get him under 7. Just odd

Would a guy like Arvidsson at 2 rw and Wotherspoon at 3LD be better than Geekie at 2RW and Z at 3LD?

I'm sure it will all work out as the season goes on, but it really doesn't seem like this was the finished product game one they imagined?


Looks like 8 teams at this point.
Click to expand...

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouJersey
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X