- Apr 25, 2006
- 52,238
- 56,567
They'd trade him to the East, not to us.Maybe we can swoop in and get Lindholm for cheap. Even though I'm definitely worried about his play this year.
They'd trade him to the East, not to us.Maybe we can swoop in and get Lindholm for cheap. Even though I'm definitely worried about his play this year.
May not even need to pay. Especially nothing significantWe need to get rid of his 4M cap hit for next year so it's not pointless. Pay now or pay next summer to do it.
Can't afford to retain or buy him out.May not even need to pay. Especially nothing significant
Retain $1-1.5m for a year and some feeder will probably see vet value in him.
Otherwise buy him out and eat $1.3 for 2 years.
Pretty good chance they already tried to get rid of Johansen, if you believe the Tanev rumors.
Lindholm back in the menu?
God I hope it happensYou gotta hand it to Allvin for being creative.
I bet Guentzel goes to Vegas.
Touche
Lindholm back in the menu?
If this really happens, as a neutral, I would absolutely love to see a Canucks - Bruins final (that is, of course, only if the Avs are out of it).Really doubt they'd trade him to Colorado. Boston needs a C just as badly, and then Vancouver could keep him out of the west.
This board would have been over the moon on Lindholm and screaming about a Stanley Cup right now.Allvin: Creative
CMac in same situation: Fire the dumbass.
My comment was in regard to the screw up he is in at the moment. But to your point I didn't want him.This board would have been over the moon on Lindholm and screaming about a Stanley Cup right now.
That's not what he's saying.This board would have been over the moon on Lindholm and screaming about a Stanley Cup right now.