- Aug 25, 2006
- 9,777
- 8,073
100% this.That's not what he's saying.
He's saying if CMac traded lots of assets for Lindholm and then a month later traded him for less or much less because he wasn't working out he'd be labeled a dumbass.
100% this.That's not what he's saying.
He's saying if CMac traded lots of assets for Lindholm and then a month later traded him for less or much less because he wasn't working out he'd be labeled a dumbass.
They'll get Guentzel for him, and have Boston pay Pittsburgh for Guentzel.Vancouver getting less for Lindholm from Boston (they’re not trading him here - if he’s worked out that badly there is he really better than Henrique anyways?) than they gave up for him would be delightful
Allvin: Creative
CMac in same situation: Fire the dumbass.
I’m sure they’ll get Guentzel and the Lindholm return would be part of it but not sold that Boston would give up the full package that the Pens would get for Guentzel for the failed Lindholm experimentThey'll get Guentzel for him, and have Boston pay Pittsburgh for Guentzel.
I'm all for Lindholm being traded again. Imagine deadlines where the big names go a month early then get traded again (for much poorer returns) because they're actually all garbage. Absolute carnage. Get it done.
I was referring to if CMac would have traded for Lindholm and then a month later having to flip him because that was a mistake.Uh..
I think Vancouver has been burnt down between now and the last time they won anything.
I'm failing to see how it's the same situation?
If he traded him off for a bit less, following Lindholm hypothetically not working out, as part of a hyper-aggressive strategy to bring in a new and better fit to grab a cup then no, I don't think we'd be labelling him a dumbass.That's not what he's saying.
He's saying if CMac traded lots of assets for Lindholm and then a month later traded him for less or much less because he wasn't working out he'd be labeled a dumbass.
Oh I am convinced there would be quite a few.If he traded him off for a bit less, following Lindholm hypothetically not working out, as part of a hyper-aggressive strategy to bring in a new and better fit to grab a cup then no, I don't think we'd be labelling him a dumbass.
Also, it bears noting that up until just a week ago it seems that, from what we've learned now, the Canucks were serious about the prospect of having to trade Pettersson. Lindholm was a backup to that eventuality. But the ultimatum they gave Pettersson to re-sign or get traded to Carolina worked. Now, with Miller and Pettersson locked in, Lindholm's centre capabilities are less of a pressing need in Vancouver. Now they need a winger.
The added layer therefore, if the Canucks pull this off, is that they brought in Lindholm so that they could suffer losing Pettersson down the middle, arranged a trade of Pettersson for likely Necas+(+) to Carolina, and then went to Pettersson with all of the power in their court and gave him their ultimatum. Pettersson caved and signed a great contract. All in all, seems like smart business to me.
They'll lose out a bit, I expect. Probably recoup a 1st+something from Boston if it works out.Not sure why people assume the Canucks would be losing face in this. We'll see...but if they swap Lindholm for Guentzel 1 for 1 it's an easy way out and a win for them.
What they paid for Lindholm is pretty much the asking price for Guentzel so...
I was referring to if CMac would have traded for Lindholm and then a month later having to flip him because that was a mistake.
They might not be losing face. My point was that right at this moment before their next move is announced people would be all over CMac but Allvin is creative.Not sure why people assume the Canucks would be losing face in this. We'll see...but if they swap Lindholm for Guentzel 1 for 1 it's an easy way out and a win for them.
What they paid for Lindholm is pretty much the asking price for Guentzel so...
Absolutely bonkers
They don't need to...I expect something like this:They'll lose out a bit, I expect. Probably recoup a 1st+something from Boston if it works out.
Pretty quiet on the Avs rumors. Just like Sidney Crosby.
They don't need to...I expect something like this:
Pitts: picks (from BOS) + prospects (from BOS) + a 3rd pick (from Canucks)
BOS: Lindholm
VAN: Guetnzel
So the Canucks would upgrade from Lindholm to Guetzel for a 3rd.
Me too. The All In Every Year GM's will shorten their contention window from 2-3 years to 1-2.
Avs will be sitting there with 5x the amount of shots at a Cup, with one already under their belt, and be the only team capable of a dynasty in the cap era.
The Isles strike me as a club just dooming themselves to mediocrity...but hey, I'm sure the rest of the league is quite excited that 23 year old Oliver Wahlstrom and his *checks notes* 2 goals and 4 assists on the season is available...I always get a kick out of rumors where a team wants to trade a busted prospect, but only if they get a better player back, with term.
See if there are better options at the TDL.It's the timing that makes no sense. If you're gonna swap Byram for Mittelstadt why wait at the trade deadline to do it? You can do that trade at any time.