The good thing is I don't have to play your game to appease you. You can run along now and claim a very important internet message board victory for yourself. All offended because Joe Milton isn't good at football. Sad!
You're right, you don't have to play. Lets be honest though, you don't WANT to play because you know you've painted yourself into a corner. Your 3 options based on the question were basically
1. Admit that Completion% isn't the end all be all for how good a QB is/was.
The problem - you going this route blows up your entire "argument" that Milton wasn't as good because he had a worse completion%
2. You hold your ground on your completion% argument.
The problem - you doing so now by default admits Zappe was as good as Drake Maye this pre-season (and you know that's not the case) and that Mac Jones is better than both Zappe & Maye (and we know how much you hate Jones)
3. Do exactly what you did in your post. Try and take some moral high ground so you don't have to admit that your take is biased because of your feelings
I'm not even offended about Milton lol. He's a 3rd string project QB, that at best likely turns into a journeymen back-up. You brought all this on yourself if we're being honest. You were offended that I said Milton was as good as Zappe this pre-season. You then proceeded to make a terrible argument about why he wasn't. When your own logic on why Milton wasn't as good was used against you, you've decided to try and walk away because you knew your argument was flawed.
