Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,629
- 32,007
I would not have moved Ritchie for Hertl personally. I want nothing to do with Hertls contract especially with all the other long contracts were going to deal with,I'd rather have a 2C signed through his prime years.
Yeah but I'm asking if Ritchie had the same value as Edstrom, considering Ritchie was supposed to be drafted a lot higher if he was healthy, and his season has reinforced that? Feels like he'd be worth more.
I'd have moved the unknown in Ritchie and kept Byram no problem with Hertl at only $6.75M(?).
Unless Edstrom carried a ton of value, I'd even rather do two 1st's and a prospect like Gulyayev/Behrens/OO, or all three, and get Hertl and Byram easily.
Helps them short term, and long term with Byram and Ritchie, and Mitts migth cost more than Hertl.