jabubenice
Registered User
see thats the spirit!! everyone bitching, vegas this vegas that... they forget what happened to the bruins last season... game is not played on paperI want the Golden Knights in the playoffs.
see thats the spirit!! everyone bitching, vegas this vegas that... they forget what happened to the bruins last season... game is not played on paperI want the Golden Knights in the playoffs.
Grier doesn't have any clue as to what he is doing.I hate San Jose more than I have Vegas in this deal. You give them a #2C center in the playoffs where the LTIR is actually beneficial to them, replace needing to pay Stephenson, retain 17% to make Hertl's contract reasonable moving forward, give up 2 3rds... and only get 2 late 1sts in return.
Hertl is a far superior player to Mittelstadt for the next few years, which is the only years that really matter. Wish CMac had the balls to pull off this trade.
It is overblown, especially with Walker... but Byram was 6'1"HF, where a 6' D is a giant, and a 5'11" D is a midget.
He can finally update his Tinder.
Don’t worry he could always be waivedIm sad that Lindholm didn't get re-traded
Ugh, we could have kept Bo and got Hertl at $6.75M (?) for just a late 1st, two 3rd's, and the value of a late 1st prospect in Edstrom?
How much value does Edstrom have?
Mitt's may cost more than Hertl after he's re-signed.
That would've been a 1st, Ritchie and 2 3rds. Would've been able to keep Byram but we get Mitts to end his prime years instead of trading all that for a dude who's got a long ass contract and 30.Ugh, we could have kept Bo and got Hertl at $6.75M (?) for just a late 1st, two 3rd's, and the value of a late 1st prospect in Edstrom?
How much value does Edstrom have?
Mitt's may cost more than Hertl after he's re-signed.
Im sad that Lindholm didn't get re-traded
That would've been a 1st, Ritchie and 2 3rds. Would've been able to keep Byram but we get Mitts to end his prime years instead of trading all that for a dude who's got a long ass contract and 30.
I would not have moved Ritchie for Hertl personally. I want nothing to do with Hertls contract especially with all the other long contracts were going to deal with,I'd rather have a 2C signed through his prime years.I actually got the 3rd's part wrong it looks like. Looks like Vegas got the two 3rd's not SJ.
If this deal was proposed before the deadline, most here would have been all for it, even with Ritchie and Hertl at 30, because the argument was they need to go all in this year, future be damned.
I don't know much about Edstrom, but are we sure he has the same value as Ritchie after the season he's had?
Ritchie was supposed to go a lot higher if he was healthu, and his season has reinforced that value.
Sad? I think it's funny.Im sad that Lindholm didn't get re-traded
Woulda, coulda, shoulda......... If I only knew then what I know now.......Ugh, we could have kept Bo and got Hertl at $6.75M (?) plus two 3rd's for just a late 1st, and the value of a late 1st prospect in Edstrom?
How much value does Edstrom have?
Mitt's may cost more than Hertl after he's re-signed.
Excited that the Avs improved
Also excited that the Leafs and Oilers opponents improved
I mean at least Hertl can't play for nowWell, can the acquisitions play? No?