GrandmaCookie
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 2,442
- 2,854
Do we really need two unidimensional goal scorer in Caufield and Eiserman tho?
Maybe they should forfeit the pick then…?I don’t like they don’t meet with Iginla. If Demidov and Lindstrom are gone, who they gon’ pick?
Hahaha at that point you just need to laughI’m feeling pessimistic this morning.
With some of the rumors circling around, imagine the following worst case scenario:
1. Celebrini
2. Demidov
3. Sennecke
4. Lindsrrom
Draft Levshunov and pop the champagneI’m feeling pessimistic this morning.
With some of the rumors circling around, imagine the following worst case scenario:
1. Celebrini
2. Demidov
3. Sennecke
4. Lindsrrom
Do we really need two unidimensional goal scorer in Caufield and Eiserman tho?
Yeah it wouldn't be the end of the world. Obviously we need forwards be a RHD would still be acceptable and he's the best one this year.Draft Levshunov and pop the champagne
If we draft a D, KH will probably be aggressive in acquiring a forward via tradeYeah it wouldn't be the end of the world. Obviously we need forwards be a RHD would still be acceptable and he's the best one this year.
Well they are right, if we grab a mid teen pick and grab Eiserman, Levshunov wouldn’t be so bad.oh yes another def , literally what this team needs
what mid teen pick tho , why yall crazy on that one this morning . Did i miss something?Well they are right, if we grab a mid teen pick and grab Eiserman, Levshunov wouldn’t be so bad.
the party pooper has spoken.Can't wait for the same shit to be said in here as it was in 4 other threads.
Montreal meets with Eiserman, which might means they plan on moving up mid teens at the draft since they surely won’t pick him at 5. At least that is what I get out off all the chatwhat mid teen pick tho , why yall crazy on that one this morning . Did i miss something?
ah i see , unless its a matheson trade i doubt we get another pick around 11-15Montreal meets with Eiserman, which might means the plan on moving up mid teens at the draft since they surely won’t pick him at 5. At least that is what I get out off all the chat
Yeah, we need goal scorers. It's been a weakness of the team for too many years.Do we really need two unidimensional goal scorer in Caufield and Eiserman tho?
Yeah probably. I was under the impression Sennecke would be available around Eiserman so Sennecke would be my first choice but oh well.Yeah, we need goal scorers. It's been a weakness of the team for too many years.
We'll have a Pacioretty, Cammy, Kovalev, etc. One guy who lights the lamp and carries the load for a season or two. We rarely have two or more.
I don't care how sound of an approach it is in theory, by-committee scoring this many years in a row has been exhausting.
Calgary pick not tradable some say. Conditions attached to itBoth Engels and Basu get the sense the Habs want to use this pick to trade up into the teens. Eiserman is definitely a guy with a fall risk. I mean I don't want him at the 5 spot but if you get him in the teens after getting Lindstrom/Demidov. You are sitting pretty and that Calgary/Florida pick becomes the trade asset.
He may be, he may not be... Could be a smokescreen but apparently the Ducks are high on him for pick #3 according to Scott Wheeler?Yeah probably. I was under the impression Sennecke would be available around Eiserman so Sennecke would be my first choice but oh well.
Eiserman - Dach - DemidovLindstrom and Demidov are their two primary targets.
Eiserman is the Shane Wright and they are checking in on his mental make up in case they trade up.
By all logic the Catton fans voted Demidov. Despite Demidov is on the list, Lindstrom got many votes, Iginla 20 and Sennecken 11 and Buium and Leschunov got votes too.I don't see any scenario where we select Catton at 5 OA so I am ok with the poll reflecting that.
If Demidov is not there, which I think is the most likely scenario,I think it will be Iginla.