Yeah, Celebrini + Parekh + Igilna would have been nice hehWould have been huge with a seemingly loaded top 15 and potentially having 3 of them.
Yeah, Celebrini + Parekh + Igilna would have been nice hehWould have been huge with a seemingly loaded top 15 and potentially having 3 of them.
The former might happen, doubt the latter does at this point...so I can't see the Devils getting out of the first round. Knowing the Sharks' luck, they fix both this offseason and make the ECF next season...Goaltending aside I would still take the Devils roster over pretty much any other team in the East. If they can replace Vanecek and Lindy Ruff soon it's still possible they make the ECF or even win the Cup.
If the sharks werent willing to take Michkov who is a far better player in a similar sitaution, they should be ignoring Silayev also I hope.I think at this point I'm team anybody but Silayev. Honestly don't get why he is mentioned with these other guys, especially when he just signed a 3 year extension.
Similar situation? Is Silayev also signed for three more years in the KHL?If the sharks werent willing to take Michkov who is a far better player in a similar sitaution, they should be ignoring Silayev also I hope.
He's signed until the end of 25/26 season, so two.Similar situation? Is Silayev also signed for three more years in the KHL?
The reason Silayev is mentioned with the other top prospects is because 6'7" defensemen who can skate and hold their own in a top pro league at 17 years old don't grow on trees.
Pretty standard for KHLers. Silayev's not a guy you'd want in the NHL right away regardless.He's signed until the end of 25/26 season, so two.
Michkov and Silayev's contracts both end the same season. As Hodge said he's probably not NHL ready until then anyway, but even if he is that's 2 additional years to round things out in the KHL. And yeah I don't think Grier looks at scoring wingers (even though he's insanely talented) and 6'7 defenders the same.If the sharks werent willing to take Michkov who is a far better player in a similar sitaution, they should be ignoring Silayev also I hope.
That’s assuming that they’ll even sign NHL contracts right away after those deals are up. Kaprisov, Kuznetsov, and Yurov didn’t.Pretty standard for KHLers. Silayev's not a guy you'd want in the NHL right away regardless.
I know this isn’t going to be the most popular opinion but is that the worst thing? Even in 2 years this team is going to be hot garbage.That’s assuming that they’ll even sign NHL contracts right away after those deals are up. Kaprisov, Kuznetsov, and Yurov didn’t.
If the sharks werent willing to take Michkov who is a far better player in a similar sitaution, they should be ignoring Silayev also I hope.
We may not even have the same goalies come those games.So we're tied with Chicago for points with 3 extra games in hand. Let's say we lose them all and are tied in both points and ROW. I think it comes down to our season series after that?
They beat us in a SO, and we play 2 more times in March. Those games will be crucial for 32nd lol. Hope our goalies are sick with a cold or something non serious that week.
It is, because if they decide (or are pressured into deciding) to re-sign in Russia again, then you miss out on a lot of cheap productive years of the player and only have a few years of them under team control. Kaprisov was basically on an ELC for a year before signing a massive extension.I know this isn’t going to be the most popular opinion but is that the worst thing? Even in 2 years this team is going to be hot garbage.
I know this isn’t going to be the most popular opinion but is that the worst thing? Even in 2 years this team is going to be hot garbage.
Why so anti Dickinson? He's also big, smooth skating, and skilled. He's one of the best overall skaters in the CHL at 6'3". I'm not sure which of the three I'd take if I had to choose.Grier has preached that he wants the Sharks to play with skill and size, and the Sharks D prospect pool is crickets after Mukh in terms of top-4 prospects. I bet he takes Silayev or Levshunov if they don't land Celebrini. Two big, smooth skating, skilled defensemen. Just gotta hope it's not Dickinson...
His upside is lower because of his low offensive capabilities. If we're worried about Silayev being a black box due to KHL reasons, just take Levshunov and forget about it. He's an excellent prospect.Why so anti Dickinson? He's also big, smooth skating, and skilled. He's one of the best overall skaters in the CHL at 6'3". I'm not sure which of the three I'd take if I had to choose.
I also wouldn't rule out Grier going for Lindstrom before any of the D, if he thinks he could develop into a franchise forward. Another big, fast, skilled, hard to play against player.
I prefer both Levshunov and Dickinson to Silayev, for what it’s worth. I’d say they should be 2 and 3 on the Sharks’ board.Grier has preached that he wants the Sharks to play with skill and size, and the Sharks D prospect pool is crickets after Mukh in terms of top-4 prospects. I bet he takes Silayev or Levshunov if they don't land Celebrini. Two big, smooth skating, skilled defensemen. Just gotta hope it's not Dickinson...