HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 91 21.6%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 76 18.0%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422

Whitesnake

If you rebuild, they will come.
Jan 5, 2003
89,860
37,615
Been involved in hockey development for a long time. Transferring small man skills from a small man's frame to a large man's frame takes some time. His upside is among the highest of all forwards in this draft.
I think that nobody would have a problem with him around 10. It would be insane and exciting. The issue here is top 5. Again, pick him. But they better be right. We will see later if it pays off. I just have the belief right now that they are working way too hard for picks that seem easier to make. But future will tell us if the work was worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kents polished head

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,649
13,479
Sennecke,s agility and hands will mean nothing if he's not willing to use his body and play in thie traffic. Who are the last huge guys who ended up succeeding while not using their body?
He did use his body from January on and throughout the playoffs. He was taking hits to make plays and he was blocking shots. His game truly transformed down the stretch. He's not even close to reaching his potential. Wait until he's 200 lbs in 3 years.
 

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,649
13,479
I think that nobody would have a problem with him around 10. It would be insane and exciting. The issue here is top 5. Again, pick him. But they better be right. We will see later if it pays off. I just have the belief right now that they are working way too hard for picks that seem easier to make. But future will tell us if the work was worth it.
He's certainly a high reward pick. His floor is lower than Iggy and Helenius but if Habs take him and believe he'll develop properly under their oversight, HUGE upside. He would electrify the crowd with his puck skills.
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,020
5,715
Have you watched Sennecke? He caught my eye in the CHL Prospects Game and I've followed him closely since. He's a magician with the puck and he's like Kovalev or Spezza on 1-on-1s. You seem fixated on overall production but you're not giving any consideration to Sennecke having 5 straight months of high end play in the OHL as he figures out how to play in his rapidly stretching out frame. He also lit up the OHL playoffs when it's tougher to find space and did it against some strong OHL teams.

You seem to be ignoring or simply not aware of the context around him and how his game has evolved in his draft year. It's totally fair to say you don't want him in the top 5 but suggesting he should be down there near the bottom of the 1st round is nuts and nobody who's been to an OHL rink in 2024 would agree with that.

The draft is about where these kids will be in 3-5 years and he's heading upwards at a fast pace.
Not sure how you expect to be taken seriously when you pull that card right off the bat.

And Kovalev? Lol that’s exactly the hyperbole I’ve been talking about. Flashy dekes in the neutral zone that lead to nothing or turnovers as often as they do advantages/positives need to be taken with a huge grain of salt with junior players.

Guess who else looked really impressive doing that kind of stuff in juniors? Alex Galchenyuk. People, pro scouts included, raved about his hands, creativity, and IQ (yes, his IQ). He even had people complimenting his defensive awareness and work ethic. I never even saw anyone mention skating concerns either.

He turned out to be dumb as shit and one of the worst skaters in the league, and a turnover machine who wouldn’t quit trying to make junior style plays in the NHL. It’s easy to look impressive making flashy plays in juniors, but a whole different story at the NHL level. Thats why I’m wary of players whose game centers around that type of stuff. AG had vastly superior numbers compared to Sennecke though, so you could at least use that as an excuse in hindsight. Sennecke doesn’t even have the type of numbers to make it enticing.

The point is that you need to be really careful watching these type of players that play a flashy junior style game, especially when it’s not even consistently translating into results at the junior level as is the case with Sennecke.

Sennecke is one of those guys - he’s extremely raw and plays a real junior type game and is lacking in areas that you need to succeed in the pros.

I’m not saying Sennecke is going to turn out like Galchenyuk, but I’m saying that putting all your eggs into the flashy junior highlights basket is ill-advised. And with Sennecke, that seems to be the main selling point, along with the growth spurt thing. I wouldn’t use a top 15 pick on a player who’s main selling points are that.
 
Last edited:

BeliveauFan4ever

Registered User
Apr 10, 2006
2,280
2,144
Are some fans still trying to sneak Sennecke in the 5-8 range mix when most have him 10-14? I think we need Bob's new list next week. See how much of a reach players like Iggy, Catton, Sennecke will be at 5.

I like Sennecke a lot... If I had the 10th or 11th pick. But yeah, I really do think it's a big reach to try to justify taking him 5th.
Every team keeps picking guys that would do great in 5 years. It's the nature of the draft. Yet...MOST will pick players that are also already great with a stunning draft season. We could do that with Iginla. Sennecke did not. No matter the points from January, his season was relatively close to the previous one.

It will take some imagination to prefer him to Iginla. It will take a lot of balls to pass over another legacy while the last the Habs did it, we also picked up a guy who ALSO skyrocketed the rankings.

Sennecke,s agility and hands will mean nothing if he's not willing to use his body and play in thie traffic. Who are the last huge guys who ended up succeeding while not using their body?

Anyway, I can,t wait for the behind the scenes this year if Sennecke ends up our pick. Frankly, at this point, I hope that all 3 of Demidov, Lindstrom and Iginla are gone when it's our turn to talk. Geez, might as well drop down.
I don’t see a shrinking violet out there.

Score like Sennecke, hit like Lindros? Hell, no.

But I don’t see him playing scared out there.

I can think of a LOT of high-end forwards that would have me combing Youtube for weeks trying to find ‘that game’ where they delivered a noteworthy bodycheck.
 

SannywithoutCompy

Registered User
Dec 22, 2020
2,025
3,756
Every team keeps picking guys that would do great in 5 years. It's the nature of the draft. Yet...MOST will pick players that are also already great with a stunning draft season. We could do that with Iginla. Sennecke did not. No matter the points from January, his season was relatively close to the previous one.

It will take some imagination to prefer him to Iginla. It will take a lot of balls to pass over another legacy while the last the Habs did it, we also picked up a guy who ALSO skyrocketed the rankings.

Sennecke,s agility and hands will mean nothing if he's not willing to use his body and play in thie traffic. Who are the last huge guys who ended up succeeding while not using their body?

Anyway, I can,t wait for the behind the scenes this year if Sennecke ends up our pick. Frankly, at this point, I hope that all 3 of Demidov, Lindstrom and Iginla are gone when it's our turn to talk. Geez, might as well drop down.
Sennecke plays in traffic like the deaf kid down the street, he's constantly attacking the middle of the ice.

I prefer Iginla as well (brought him up to number 4 on my list after Celebrini, Demidov, Buium), but Sennecke absolutely uses his body and plays in traffic. Iginla just does it better.

Also again, you really can't just hardwave away the difference between his first and second half, especially when there's a very reasonable explanation for why it took him until then to get going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sam I Am

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,020
5,715
Sennecke plays in traffic like the deaf kid down the street, he's constantly attacking the middle of the ice.
He doesn’t do it at all consistently enough. Some games he does, some games he plays like Marner, only he doesn’t have the vision or passing skills to make the same kind of things happen from there like Marner can.

It’s either a motivation issue, or it’s that he only is willing to get into the middle and into traffic against teams where he thinks he can get away with it, and he shies away from those areas against teams with bigger more physical players. With the puck on his stick, he’ll about try anything. Without is another story.

Seems like more of a motivation thing.
 

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,649
13,479
Not sure how you expect to be taken seriously when you pull that card right off the bat.

And Kovalev? Lol that’s exactly the hyperbole I’ve been talking about. Flashy dekes in the neutral zone that lead to nothing or turnovers as often as they do advantages/positives need to be taken with a huge grain of salt with junior players.

Guess who else looked really impressive doing that kind of stuff in juniors? Alex Galchenyuk. People, pro scouts included, raved about his hands, creativity, and IQ (yes, his IQ). He even had people complimenting his defensive awareness and work ethic. I never even saw anyone mention skating concerns either.

He turned out to be dumb as shit and one of the worst skaters in the league, and a turnover machine who wouldn’t quit trying to make junior style plays in the NHL. It’s easy to look impressive making flashy plays in juniors, but a whole different story at the NHL level. Thats why I’m wary of players whose game centers around that type of stuff. AG had vastly superior numbers compared to Sennecke though, so you could at least use that as an excuse in hindsight. Sennecke doesn’t even have the type of numbers to make it enticing.

The point is that you need to be really careful watching these type of players that play a flashy junior style game, especially when it’s not even consistently translating into results at the junior level as is the case with Sennecke.

Sennecke is one of those guys - he’s extremely raw and plays a real junior type game and is lacking in areas that you need to succeed in the pros.

I’m not saying Sennecke is going to turn out like Galchenyuk, but I’m saying that putting all your eggs into the flashy junior highlights basket is ill-advised. And with Sennecke, that seems to be the main selling point, along with the growth spurt thing. I wouldn’t use a top 15 pick on a player who’s main selling points are that.
I'm sorry man but when you talk about Sennecke being all flash and dash, I can't help but question whether you watched him play in the 2nd half other than the highlights you mentioned. Not only does it go against the eye test but the people around the OHL were raving about the switch that went off in his game and how he played far more physical and was sacrificing his body. His team shot up the standings and then knocked off a couple of teams in the OHL largely because of his play. This went on for 5 months at the end of his draft cycle. This isn't someone who got hot for a couple of weeks.

Galchenyuk had a lot of non-hockey factors that led to his career going down the toilet. I don't know anything about Sennecke the person but if he has a good head on his shoulders and his willing to put in the work, someone may land a sexy gem with size in a draft that doesn't have a lot of forwards with top line upside.
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,020
5,715
I'm sorry man but when you talk about Sennecke being all flash and dash, I can't help but question whether you watched him play in the 2nd half other than the highlights you mentioned.
🤦‍♂️…okay.
people around the OHL were raving about the switch that went off in his game and how he played far more physical and was sacrificing his body.
Source/link? Because that’s not what I saw. I saw a player who maybe looked more engaged and motivated to make things happen more consistently (i.e., getting into traffic, getting to the dirty areas), mostly just with the puck on his stick though. His engagement and effort away from the puck was as inconsistent and fleeting as it’s always been.

I didn’t see him playing physical or using his body to gain advantage much at all. That’s not his game and he’s never played like that to any significant extent.
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,207
5,724
I felt that way until today. Chicago will go Demidov.
For a team that needs everything it seems like such a huge mistake to take the winger over the defenceman especially since it's not like Demidov is at an undisputed higher tier. As much as fans talk about Chicago's dynasty being Kane & Toews, I think managements tend to see Keith as equally if not more important piece.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,412
5,178
No longer small, his English is good and he's learning it in advance to make it to NA as soon as possible. If you're 50/50 and one guy just removed 2 biggest issues from his ledger..

Don't think it will change much in the grand scheme of things.

Scout/GM may like the insane skill level of Demidov. He is also competing against oversized Ds and oversized Cs. For all i know, these are the archetypes GM reaches for.

It will be a very interesting draft for sure. And an interesting week of speculation before.

I think they go Buium, and i am totally spitting it out of my ass. But i don't know, i think he displays some of the human qualities we saw in Slaf and Reinbacher and he has one hell of a resume. I wont get on the hockey part bc i know you are lower on him but i think he feel like the kind of candidate management is looking for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naslund

Banjo Cat

Registered User
May 31, 2007
6,405
3,002
I have only seen Sennecke play watching scouting vids. He is definitely intriguing. It's strange to see him stickhandle so well because he almost looks clumsy while doing it.
 

Pompeius Magnus

Registered User
May 18, 2014
20,340
17,348
Kanata ,ON
No longer small, his English is good and he's learning it in advance to make it to NA as soon as possible. If you're 50/50 and one guy just removed 2 biggest issues from his ledger..
He was still pretty evasive about exactly when he'll be able to play in NA, FWIW. That would be my number 1 worry, above everything else.
 

Naslund

Registered User
Jun 18, 2006
1,861
1,690
USA
Don't think it will change much in the grand scheme of things.

Scout/GM may like the insane skill level of Demidov. He is also competing against oversized Ds and oversized Cs. For all i know, these are the archetypes GM reaches for.

It will be a very interesting draft for sure. And an interesting week of speculation before.

I think they go Buium, and i am totally spitting it out of my ass. But i don't know, i think he displays some of the human qualities we saw in Slaf and Reinbacher and he has one hell of a resume. I wont get on the hockey part bc i know you are lower on him but i think he feel like the kind of candidate management is looking for.
I think the major reason Chicago goes D is that after Celebrini, the three Fs (Demidov, Lindstrom and Iggy) are pretty much equal to the six Ds in terms of expectations, and next year the draft shift to being forward-heavy. Chicago will be a bottom feeder again, and will be able to choose a top forward to play with Bedard. They will take Lev or Dickinson IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gally11

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad