Yes, I agree, and that’s what I’m saying; neither does Sennecke. He’s in there with these type of guys. Again, what has he done to separate himself from them? You’re going to have to give me more than a hunch or gut feeling, something tangible.
As for your point about Sennecke’s growth/frame, it doesn’t matter all that much to me because he doesn’t play at all physical, and he’s not good defensively. Thats not his game, and his extra size isn’t going to help the way he plays. Like you said, he plays like a 5’10” player. His size isn’t going to factor in all that much unless he completely changes how he plays the game.
As for Greentree, I have him above Sennecke. He plays a more projectable game, does all the little things well, is a leader, is bigger and actually plays physical, good defensively, and has a better shot. He’s better down in the corners and along the boards. He’s much more consistent and works harder. Even if he doesn’t pan out offensively, there’s a very good chance he’ll still be a useful player at the next level. Can’t say the same for Sennecke.
And on top of all that, he produced nearly 50% more than Sennecke on a worse team in the same league. Nobody on his team was anywhere close to him, so it’s not like he’s a product of some other player. He did it all himself.
The one knock is his skating, which is not even bad technically. His acceleration is what’s lacking, but he’s at least average in terms of speed once he gets going. The concerns are overblown imo, and it’s something that’s easily fixable.
Sennecke in comparison really isn’t even that much better in that regard, certainly not enough to put him above in overall rankings, so to me there’s just nothing to base the argument of Sennecke over Greentree on, aside from hunches or flashy highlights.
