Jaynki
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2014
- 5,871
- 6,054
AgreeYes its stupid to cherry pick numbers like that, Catton is still an impressive player.
Well, Catton is ultimately a way better prospects than the 3 i named. ainec.That's fair enough, we can all agree that 50 goals and 115 pts and 30 goals and 115 pts are very different statlines.
There are also a few caveats. Catton was pretty much all alone on a terrible team, while each of these other guys were on powerhouse teams. I think it was quite accepted that in particular, Petan's numbers were inflated for this reason.
Another being that there's an argument for each of those other 3 guys being legitimately undersized at 5'9" and being flyweights when they were drafted. Although I'm not bothered by Rossi's size, as he's relatively thick and playing at a pretty average/acceptable NHL weight right now. While Catton is merely "undersized", being 2 inches taller and already heavier at the combine than either of the other two are even today.
I also think Rossi was a fine pick at #9, and he could have gone earlier but we'll see how his career progresses.
Maybe we should slack the Crosby/Bedard convo tho.